similar to: Opus doesn't like the frame size 1024

Hi Dmitry, So it's not explicitly in your report, but it looks like the crash is due to a divide-by-zero at: min_coef = silk_DIV32_16( silk_int16_MAX, silk_RSHIFT( psSilk_VAD->counter, 4 ) + 1 ); which happens because counter is -16 (which means (-16 >> 4) + 1 == 0). Now, this could be caused by an integer wrap-around, but it should only happen after encoding around

Stack: (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000aaf38a in silk_VAD_GetNoiseLevels (pX=pX at entry=0x7f26740297a0, psSilk_VAD=psSilk_VAD at entry=0x15897c38) at silk/VAD.c:315 #1 0x0000000000aa4a9d in silk_VAD_GetSA_Q8_sse4_1 (psEncC=0x15897c18, pIn=<optimized out>) at silk/x86/VAD_sse.c:177 #2 0x0000000000a9f92b in silk_encode_do_VAD_FLP (psEnc=psEnc at entry=0x15897c18) at

Hi Jean-Marc, gdb out is "Program terminated with signal 8, Arithmetic exception." most likely this division by zero. you're right, this crash is reproduce on seq number 4294967265 (20ms rtp packet). This is about 994 days. "Jean-Marc Valin" <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> писал(а):Hi Dmitry, > >So it's not explicitly in your report, but it looks like the crash

Hello! I have been using int iByteSizeEncoded = opus_encode(m_enc, m_ShortRawInput,960,m_EncodedBytes, 4000); iByteSizeEncoded was 120 as expected. Now when I double the frame size... int iByteSizeEncoded = opus_encode(m_enc, m_ShortRawInput,960*2,m_EncodedBytes, 4000); ... iByteSizeEncoded is not 240 as expected, but 239. This seems really odd to me since 239 bytes could not even be

HI, I'm trying to simulate an audio conference where each leg can be with a different bit rate. This needs to encode the source PCM to to different bit rates back to back and store and send respective encoded frames/packet to the respective channel. For this I changed the opus_demo as below. But the output of the second encoded frames is completely garbled. Appreciate if anyone can suggest

I'm new using OPUS and I've implemented the OPUS lib under PIC32MZ, using the MIPS configuration. It compiles correctly and it seems that all the procedures invoked returns no error. However, when I excite the encoder with a pure 1 kHz tone, the encoding/decoding procedure returns al the samples to silence (the buffer is filled with 0x8001 or 0x7fff). The configuration is 48000 sps, 64kHz

If you encode with int iByteSizeEncoded = opus_encode(m_enc, m_ShortsInput, (1920/sizeof(short)), m_EncodedBytes, (960*6)); ... the byte size is 120. I thought that an odd value like 359 has to be a fault on my side. I thought it would be a multiple of something. So 359 is really correct??? Thank you for clearing this up. Am 06.10.2013 16:50, schrieb Jean-Marc Valin: > Why

Hi everybody I wrote a couple of months ago about implementing the opus codec on a DK52 from Nordic (nrf52832 MCU, Cortex M4). In the meantime I got a bit further and would again like to ask some questions. My settings: I included all the opus files into my project (opus-1.2.1) Defined: FIXED POINT, VAR_ARRAYS, DISABLE FLOAT API, OPUS_BUILD, CELT_MODE_ONLY I am able to allocate enough memory

Why does opus_encode return 359, and not 360, please? This is my code: int iShortsRead = fread(m_RawBytes, sizeof(short), (5760/sizeof(short)), fin); for(int i=0;i<iShortsRead;i++) { opus_int32 s; s=m_RawBytes[2*i+1]<<8|m_RawBytes[2*i]; s=((s&0xFFFF)^0x8000)-0x8000; m_ShortsInput[i]=s; }

Hello, I have an p2p voice chat application using WAVE PCM (winmm). Now i am trying to add opus encoding to it to send it over the TCP/IP and then decoding it back to play - but without success (without opus it works ok) Here is an example of my code. I get message from input device then encode with opus then decode it back to output wave header and play. Doing it i hear only noise in my

Hello, I've been trying to understand how to use opus codec for quite some time. There is a thing that doesn't make sense to me. I will try to explain what it is below, In *opus_encode() *function, *opus_int16 pcm* is said to have a size of *frame_size * channels*, where *frame_size* is said to be one of* 20, 240, 480, 960, 1920, and 2880.* Let's say, frame_size is 960, then

Hi! I haven't looked into the code yet, but the patch uses different coding conventions like "if(" and "if ("; like wise "){" and ") {". My personal taste is to have spaces after keywords, but that's just me. I'd prefer a consistent coding style. Regards, Ulrich >>> Michael Graczyk <mgraczyk at google.com> schrieb am 26.04.2016

Thanks for the reply. For my application I unfortunately need a better signal reconstruction. It's not necessarily a problem that the constant DC voltage is removed, but the audio signal will need to be more exact because it's also studied visually. To be more exact, I need to record and transmit audio data recorded from animals (mostly birds). Are there ways to achieve a more similar

Hi, Opus team I'm Huang Hao and trouble you again. When I used the OpusRepacketizer as Jean-Marc mentioned, I got a result (maybe problem I'm not sure) that perplexes me, please give me some comments. The result be described as below: First(all init which are needed I have done), I used opus_encode() to get the encoded data successfully. The encoder control parameters are set: VBR=0,

This patch adds a new option "channel-mapping" to opusenc which sets the channel mapping family used by the multistream encoder. Please let me know whether adding this option is worthwhile and whether the help string is okay. I tried to keep it short but accurate. The error message for an unimplemented channel mapping is "Error cannot create encoder: request not implemented".

Yuri, on which host? 2011/8/17 Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com>: > In r134967 it still worked, and in r137742 it now doesn't. > I used such flags: --enable-assertions --enable-shared --enable-libffi > --enable-debug-runtime --enable-debug-symbols --disable-optimized > > Before build would create directory tools/llvm-shlib under the build > tree. Now it is missing. In my

hi,All, I want to know whether Opus has AEC features like Speex? Thanks 2012/10/17 <opus-request at xiph.org> > Send opus mailing list submissions to > opus at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Forwarding the patch to commits so that it doesn't get lost. Yuri -------- Original Message -------- From: - Fri Jun 03 12:15:47 2011 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 10000000 Return-Path: <llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.rawbw.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=7.0

Why should it return 360 in the first place??? On 10/06/2013 06:33 AM, Hermann Weber wrote: > Why does opus_encode return 359, and not 360, please? > > This is my code: > > int iShortsRead = fread(m_RawBytes, sizeof(short), > (5760/sizeof(short)), fin); > for(int i=0;i<iShortsRead;i++) > { > opus_int32 s; >

I am in the network that is behind the Zscaler firewall. Virtually all ports except 80 and 443 are closed. ssh through any of ports 80 and 443 is disallowed based on protocol content analysis. It would be nice if OpenSSH would have some features that would allow the user to break out of such network. I suggest that OpenSSH adds the SSL tunneling feature: 1. The server would have the