similar to: opus-tools binary packages

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "opus-tools binary packages"

2013 Sep 08
0
opus-tools v0.1.7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We've tagged a new release of the opus-tools command line utility suite. New in this release are - - numerous build fixes. - - update to opus 1.0.3 surround encoder api. - - support for encoding from flac files. - - better metadata support, including copying tags from flac input. Source code is available from
2012 Dec 14
0
opus-tools 0.1.6 release
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greg Maxwell tagged the v0.1.6 release of opus-tools earlier this week, and I've now posted source and binary packages. The binaries are built against the Opus 1.0.2 Jean-Marc announced last week, so these are a good way to pick up those changes. This release includes many build fixes, especially for Windows, as well as some minor correctness
2012 Aug 02
0
opus-tools 0.1.4 release
All, Just a heads up that Greg tagged v0.1.4 of the opus-tools package this afternoon. Opus-tools provides command line encoding, decoding and file info for Opus audio in on-disk files. This release fixes several resampling bugs and greatly increases resampler performance. It also provides working unicode filename and tag support for Windows (Unicode worked for mac and *nix previously). Source
2013 Sep 24
0
Problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7
Hi, Seems like it's not linking with libm. I suspect it has to do with linking statically with libopus.a (is that intended?). Maybe opus-tools relies on the fact that libopus is linked with libm and doesn't explicitly add it? Greg? Jean-Marc On 09/24/2013 06:09 AM, bat guano wrote: > Hi > I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. > Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to
2012 Oct 18
1
opus-tools for windows
Hi, I am trying to compile the opus-tools with VS 2010 on windows, but I get many errrors and there is some files that there arent in the source like getoppt.c . Has anybody already compile the opus tools on windows successfully? Any Idea will be really helpfull. arctor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Nov 01
0
Possible bug in Opus 1.3 (opus-tools-0.2-opus-1.3)?
(Please wrap your lines.) On Oct 26 01:38:34, Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: > Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. Can you please post the original wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per
2017 Dec 21
1
Opus 1.3-beta released
Hi, I just released Opus 1.3-beta. This is a beta release towards the upcoming Opus 1.3. Changes include: - The spec fixes in RFC 8251 are now enabled by default - Improvements to the VAD and speech/music classification using an RNN - Improvements to stereo speech coding at low bitrate - Added support for ambisonics projection using mapping 3 (disabled by default) - Fixes to the CELT PLC
2016 Jan 12
2
Opus 1.1.2 released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Just to let everyone know that Opus 1.1.2 is out. The release fixes two bugs: - - Resetting the encoder or decoder state with OPUS_RESET_STATE would disable some run-time selected architecture-specific optimizations; and - - In hybrid mode discontinuous transmission (DTX) operation, the comfort noise above 8 kHz was incorrectly estimated and
2016 Apr 26
0
Antw: [opus-tools] [PATCH] Add channel-mapping argument to force channel mapping
Hi! I haven't looked into the code yet, but the patch uses different coding conventions like "if(" and "if ("; like wise "){" and ") {". My personal taste is to have spaces after keywords, but that's just me. I'd prefer a consistent coding style. Regards, Ulrich >>> Michael Graczyk <mgraczyk at google.com> schrieb am 26.04.2016
2014 Nov 05
0
opus Digest, Vol 70, Issue 1
What is the possibility to use the Cortex-M4 DSP instructions to fully optimize the OPUS code? Could we use the ARM CMSIS DSP library for this optimization? Thanks, Heng -----Original Message----- From: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of opus-request at xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 2:00 PM To: opus at xiph.orgis Subject: opus Digest, Vol 70,
2014 Apr 03
0
git snapshots from opus-codec.org website.
Hi On the opus-codec web page here ---> http://www.opus-codec.org/development/ Underneath "Source code repository" there are options to download the gits. As well as the traditional "$ git clone git://git.opus-codec.org/opus.git" there are also Snapshots. opus-master.tar.gz opus-1.0.x-branch.tar.gz It's a great idea... To download HEAD the command can be like this...
2013 Oct 29
0
Problem Building opus-1.0.3 on Microsoft Visual Studio 2012
On 2013-10-29 2:39 PM, Akshit Jain wrote: > Thanks a lot for replying. This is the output > >>------ Build started: Project: celt, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ > 1> fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. > 1> The system cannot find the file C:\Users\user\Desktop\mUOn\Audio. > 1> #define OPUS_VERSION ""=">
2016 Jan 13
0
SECURITY: BAD HASH: Re: Opus 1.1.2 released
On 12/01/16 21:58, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > The tarball is at: > http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/opus/opus-1.1.2.tar.gz > or > https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/opus/opus-1.1.2.tar.gz > > SHA256 checksum is: > da615edbee5d019c1833071d69a4782c19f178cf9ca1401375036ecef25cd78a The hash I get is "0e290078e31211baa7b5886bcc8ab6bc048b9fc83882532da4a1a45e58e907fd" in
2019 Jul 23
0
Opus-tools for split and merge
Hello. I would like to ask if there are any chances for a tool for splitting an opus-file at a given position, and save the parts (as opus) without re-encoding (i.e. no quality loss). And vice versa: Merge two given opus file into one (if prerequisites hold). opussplit opusFile hh:mm:ss,ss ---> opusFileSplit1 opusFileSplit2 opusmerge opusFileA opusFileB ---> opusFileAMerge For mp3 and aac
2016 Jan 27
1
opus-tools: fix PIE configure test
In opus-tools, the current PIE configure test assumes that the opus headers have been installed under the default header search path of the compiler. This isn't necessarily the case (/usr/local, /opt, ...). Straightforward fix: --- configure.ac.orig Thu Jun 12 02:11:24 2014 +++ configure.ac Wed Jan 27 16:50:22 2016 @@ -261,11 +261,11 @@ saved_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
2016 Feb 18
0
Use opus-tools on Android
Hello. I'm trying to use opus-tools on Android to encode wav data but I couldn't build it. I need to resample my raw data so opusenc does its job. Is it possible to use opus-tools on Android? OPUS is the first citizen in my app but not sure which flags I need to add to build this. LOCAL_CFLAGS := -w -std=gnu99 -O2 -DNULL=0 -DSOCKLEN_T=socklen_t -DLOCALE_NOT_USED -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE=1
2024 Aug 09
0
[EXT] Re: Re: Opus Tools -- low bitrates, new features in 1.5, "expect-loss"
On Aug 09 11:58:33, u.windl at ukr.de wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: opus <opus-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of Jan Stary > > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2024 12:00 PM > > To: Petr Pa??zek <petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com> > > Cc: opus at xiph.org > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [opus] Re: Opus Tools -- low bitrates, new features in 1.5, > >
2013 Jul 12
1
Opus 1.1-beta, a demo, and version 1.0.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We just released Opus 1.1-beta and Monty wrote a nice demo showing off all the new features, including many improvements over the alpha release: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/opus/demo3.shtml As usual, the code can be downloaded from: http://opus-codec.org/downloads/ In addition to 1.1-beta, we also released 1.0.3, which includes a
2013 Sep 25
2
Problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, bat guano <batguano999 at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Google says it's maybe something to do with the "linking process" which > might be caused by the gcc compiler. > > Can something be done with the opus code to overcome this, or shall I > compile on a different/better/newer OS? > > > > > Hello
2019 May 21
0
opus Digest, Vol 121, Issue 3
1. For starters, 32 bit support is deprecated in the next version of Mac OS X. Other things like Hardened Runtime ( https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/hardened-runtime-sandboxing.html) may not be relevant, but to make things compatible, apps need to be compiled with an SDK > 10.7. The 64 bit is the big thing. 2 & 3. I want static and can't figure out how to get it to compile. Why