similar to: OPUS on Cortex-M4

Hi Tristan, well... if speed is really his problem (and looking at those 72 MHz it probably is), wouldn't Speek surpass Opus by far? I agree that Opus is way better, but it's sadly also using more resources... But yeah, Richard you should give Opus a try if possible ;) It's generally easier to use then Speex and also more feature rich. Yours sincerely, Ren? Sch?mann *From:*

Hi, I'm planning to use Opus codec on a ARM cortex M7 device running at 400MHz. Con you please suggest the best configuration directives that I have to set in the config.h file in order to obtain the best perfromances on the cortex M7 architecture? Actually I have compiled libopus 1.2.1 with the following cnfiguration parameters: #define VAR_ARRAYS  1 #define FIXED_POINT  1 #define

Hi all, Yesterday I released a new Rails plugin: cached_models. It allows to transparently use the internal Rails cache mechanism in your models, avoiding to write code for expiring policies. Example class Project < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :developers, :cached => true end class Developer < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :project, :cached => true end # Automatic cache, all

Hi all ! I just learned about the Opus codec and would like to try it out on my NRF52 (Cortex-M4) target.   I've been struggling a bit with the "trival_example.c" setup but repeatedly run into "hard fault" crashes when stepping through the code. Firstly; for a "bare bone" configuration, does the following compiler directives make sense ? UDEFS =

I am trying to extract data from a matrix. Let's say that i am interested in extracting rows from a 4x4 matrix. Instead of giving a fix name to these 4 rows I would like to add a number to prefix. As result I should get 4 objects named: prefix_1 prefix_2 prefix_3 prefix_4 I attepted to solve the problem with a loop, but without success. Any hints?? > matrix(LETTERS[1:16], ncol=4)

hi,All, I want to know whether Opus has AEC features like Speex? Thanks 2012/10/17 <opus-request at xiph.org> > Send opus mailing list submissions to > opus at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Hello, I'm sorry if this is not the correct place to ask this question but what I'm looking for is any data on the reality of Speex working on an ARM7 core? I'm looking at doing a few diffrent projects where I will be using a proc such as the LPC2378 with the ARM7TDMI-S core running at 72Mhz (although errata show only 60Mhz is currenlty possible). Do you know if there is a port

I am trying to develop a device for a disabled person and need low bitrate voice, speex looks good, however I need to find optimized M3 code and can not, searched online all over, I use Keil also if that helps. My M3 is 128kbps/64kram 72mhz, i only need to do a encode in one part and decode in another..... Please let me know if you can help this project with a link to optimized code Thanks!

Hi , I have read that it is posible to encode higher sample rates like 96 khz or 192khz? and the output is 48 khz, the resample is internally.? http://wiki.xiph.org/OpusFAQ But it is possible to encode? 44.1khz. It is resampled to 48khz or I have to make the resample by myself and then encode it with opus. thnx, arctor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi All, On the Xiph Wiki page at: https://wiki.xiph.org/MIME_Types_and_File_Extensions I added Opus to several of the sections, but wasn't sure whether to add "Theora + Opus" to: .ogv - video/ogg .axv - video/annodex As far as I can tell, according to the Opus FAQ at: https://wiki.xiph.org/OpusFAQ#Will_Opus_replace_Vorbis_in_video_files.3F Theora + Opus is

Does a comprehensive set of instructions on how to compile Libvirt on a Microsoft Vista platform exist? Has this ever been accomplished? I would very much appreciate input from persons who can give me confidence that a Windows client application can be developed on top of Libviet that connects to a QEMU system on an Ubuntu server. The Libvirt Windows Support page

OK. Digging into this... sendmail.m4 has the lines: define(`FAX_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/faxmail')dnl define(`FAX_MAILER_ARGS',`faxmail -d -n -p 12pt $u@$h $f')dnl MAILER(`fax')dnl proto.m4 has: `R$+ < @ $+ .FAX. > $#fax $@ $2 $: $1 user at host.FAX', `ifdef(`FAX_RELAY', `R$*<@$+.FAX.>$* $:

m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 59003aea7d25c962c3332db28222b4241f68fdda Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Tue Oct 30 10:40:04 2007 +0100 make second and third arguments to AS_COMPILER_FLAG optional diff --git a/m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 b/m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 index f706196..76cf4cd 100644 ---

It looks like the change to m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 in r1968 broke the test on at least Solaris 10. Here is one possible fix. ---------------------------- --- m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4.old 2009-12-15 09:30:48.000000000 -0800 +++ m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 2009-12-15 11:12:15.291295000 -0800 @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ if test -z "${nut_have_libnetsnmp_seen}"; then

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11813 Bug ID: 11813 Summary: m4/socklen_t.m4 uses obsolete AC_TRY_COMPILE macro Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

Hi, I've (just now) been playing with a buildbot, building ogg, vorbis, speex, and theora, using a non-standard prefix on a pretty bare debian image. I noticed that vorbis was failing during configure while theora wasn't. I tracked it down to the location of ogg.m4. There is a copy of ogg.m4 in theora/m4, but there is not one in vorbis/m4. This means that if you have libogg installed

Greetings everyone. I have 2 quick questions about ao/ao.m4, ogg/ogg.m4, and vorbis/vorbis.m4. 1. Is there any reason that the macros are named AM_PATH_AO, AM_PATH_OGG, and AM_PATH_VORBIS? Can we change them to something else? I ran into a problem when trying to add support for ogg/vorbis into a package today: Automake assumes that anything beginning with AM_ belongs to automake -- these two

Dear Speex developers I am going to port Speex on LPC2368 I tested Speex encoding and the mesurments shows ~40ms cpu time for one frame Do you know who ported speex to NXP or other 32bit platform? Best Regards Zohar fox -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20081105/8261e962/attachment.htm

Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe at gentoo.org> --- Makefile.am | 2 +- configure.ac | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fee51bc27d60c7ec9d0371af88a476a232d9a8bd.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 761 bytes Desc: not available Url :

It seems that autogen.sh failed when I tried to build theora from svn because it could not find libtool.m4. With Mandrake 10.0, I have libtool.m4 in /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 Where is it supposed to be? Regards, John