similar to: Minimum files for building an embedded Opus library

Hi there, I have been browsing for web hosting and I found some firms (one of them is <http://www.hub.org>) offering 'virtual server hosting using FreeBSD'. They say that virtual server is different from virtual host, for the first is a completely separated enviroment, like a standalone server. I am a newbie on FreeBSD, I search at the archive and Google for this info; and at this

Hello, I?d like to evaluate the temporal effect on the relationship between a continuous variable (e.g. size) and the probability of mate success. Initially I was trying to do a logistic regression model incorporating the temporal effect, but I don?t know if that is the best option. I simulated some data and that?s the problem:

Hi everybody, I'm interested in evaluating the effect of a continuous variable on the mean and/or the variance of my response variable. I have built functions expliciting these and used the 'mle2' function to estimate the coefficients, as follows: func.1 <- function(m=62.9, c0=8.84, c1=-1.6) { s <- c0+c1*(x) -sum(dnorm(y, mean=m, sd=s,log=T)) } m1 <- mle2(func.1,

I am interested in developing a backend for the PIC microcontrollers. Specifically, I plan to write for the 8-bit MCUs, but would hopefully also support the 16 and 32 bit models (eventually). It is my understanding that a backend for PIC16 was previously a part of the project but was dropped in version 2.9. Is there any development on this front currently? Is there any interest in developing this

Hello, I need to expand the membership of a custom system user depending on the availability of some group on the target system i.e. user { "logger": name => "logger", ensure => "present", groups => ["adm", "wheel", "this _group_ if it exists"], shell => "/bin/bash"; } The

The exisiting label= option offer to boot on a gpt partition that have a particular label. The existing guuid= option offer to boot on a disk or partition with a particular label. This new option offer to boot the disk that have a partition which have a given label. The label is so just a way to detect a disk to boot. A typical use is for making an intelligent localboot like : label

hello - a question about filled.contour plots, for which i haven't found a response in previous posts - sorry if already treated. i'd like to draw several filled.contour plots (that is, maps) on the same device (a postscript file, actually). I know about layout(matrix) , split.screen or par(mfrow) : it works well for simple plots, but with filled.contour plots, i get several pages

I don't believe this bug is fixed. The following line appears to carry forward the same problem to xen-4.4: --with-system-seabios=/usr/share/seabios/bios.bin http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xen/xen.git/tree/debian/rules.real?id=1f422caa31ef3a537a1e41ce68789b6d5536b954#n79 bios.bin does not contain xen support any more (see previous replies on this bug report); bios-256k.bin must be used

On 30.06.2016 19:41, Erwan Velu via Syslinux wrote: > The exisiting label= option offer to boot on a gpt partition that have > a particular label. According to official documentation, 'label' does not refer solely to the GPT http://git.zytor.com/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/doc/chain.txt#n80 - 'label' will select a partition by a label (searching is done in disk order)

By any chance is it possible to "add" filled.contour(...) to an existing plot like you can do using image(..., add = TRUE). I looked at the filed.contour(...) and levelplot(...) documentation, but it didn't seem to be possible. I would like to add filled.plot(...) as shown below instead of using the image(...). Filled.contour seems to provide the smoothing interpolation

Hi everybody, If I am correct, you can compare a model with random effect with the same model without the random effect by using the nlme function, like this: no.random.model <- gls(Richness ~ NAP * fExp, method = "REML", data = RIKZ) random.model <- lme(Richness ~NAP * fExp, data = RIKZ, random = ~1 | fBeach, method = "REML")

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-1 Hardware specs: Dell PowerEdge R410 32GB RAM DDR3 1TB RAID-1 HD (Perc H200 RAID controller) Processor: 2 - Intel XeonE5620 2.4Ghz 12M Cache Turbo HT 1066MHz SO: Debian Squeeze last update: 14/10/2010 uname -a: "Linux spo-r1-u4 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 17 22:00:48 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux" At boot, xen-hypervisor is loaded

I'm using OpenSSH-2.9.9p2 on Solaris 8 sparc64. 2.9p2 worked fine, but 2.9.9p2+ is giving me trouble with one thing - sshd segfaults if I try to connect and execute a command, such as "ssh machine ls". Otherwise it works great. sshd will fork, and the child process segfaults. CVS snapshot does the same thing. I've narrowed this down somewhat. It will only happen if you use

Hi, I have a 20GB partition on a hard disk that just developed bad blocks. Fortunately, I had backups for the most important data on it, but I'd like to recover some files that were too large to backup. When running 'e2fsck /dev/hdc3', I get the following message: e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... e2fsck: Invalid argument while checking

Hi all, Does anyone now if it is possible to make Re-INVITE work (canreinvite=yes) at the same time that arguments T,t (transfer) are used in the Dial() command. I know that in order to receive the # signal during service invocation the Asterisk server needs to be in the media path, but what if I use INFO method to send the DTMF digits? Is there any possibility to use canreinvite=yes,

I'm new using OPUS and I've implemented the OPUS lib under PIC32MZ, using the MIPS configuration. It compiles correctly and it seems that all the procedures invoked returns no error. However, when I excite the encoder with a pure 1 kHz tone, the encoding/decoding procedure returns al the samples to silence (the buffer is filled with 0x8001 or 0x7fff). The configuration is 48000 sps, 64kHz

Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > This is because hook-flash support is in chan_zap, not in the core of > Asterisk. There is no need to support hook-flash on any other channel > type, because every other channel type supported by Asterisk has its own > (more reliable) methods of signaling. I'm seeing many discussions on how to provision Blind Transfer, Attendant Transfer and Call