similar to: Opus playback support in ogg123?

Hi, Dear alls I had encounted a problem in using opus-tool-0.2-opus-1.3(download from www.opus-codec.org, Win64 binaries: opus-tools-0.2-win64.zip). First, I use opusenc to generate a opus file which input is a 9-channels wav file. The opusenc can work. Then, I use opusdec to transform the generated opus file to wav file, but opusdec can't work. I received the error message: failed to open

Hi, Seems like it's not linking with libm. I suspect it has to do with linking statically with libopus.a (is that intended?). Maybe opus-tools relies on the fact that libopus is linked with libm and doesn't explicitly add it? Greg? Jean-Marc On 09/24/2013 06:09 AM, bat guano wrote: > Hi > I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. > Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to

> To be clear: did you mean the opus output of opusenc > or the wav output of opusdec? I meant during the decoding. There's one significant difference between how Opusdec deals with resampling and how, let's say, MP3 decoders usually deal with resampling. If I make an MP3 at a very low bitrate and if the encoder decides (because it's too low) to internally resample my audio

1. For starters, 32 bit support is deprecated in the next version of Mac OS X. Other things like Hardened Runtime ( https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/hardened-runtime-sandboxing.html) may not be relevant, but to make things compatible, apps need to be compiled with an SDK > 10.7. The 64 bit is the big thing. 2 & 3. I want static and can't figure out how to get it to compile. Why

Dear all, When I install the current version of opus-tools on my Ubuntu system, I have the following problem: When I try to open the test vector 'testvector01.bit', I got the error message 'Decoding complete. This doesn't look like a Opus file'. When I open the 'testvector01.bit.opus' the decoding works fine, but the tool opus_compare mentioned, that the number of

Hello, I understand it would be better to post several messages with separate topics but I hope I don't cause too much mess if I put it all in a single message this time. To be clear, recently I've been testing Opus Tools under Windows and these are my questions/observations. ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps with Opusenc and then decoded

Hi, I had found a Opus TODO list in https://wiki.xiph.org/index.php?title=OpusTodo&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop . The item "Opus-tools" interest me. And here is my question about "Port opusdec to libopusfile/libopusurl": 1. Does this function have achieved? On one hand, I think not literally. On the other hand, after briefly reviewing opusdec.c of opus-tools, I found

On Aug 07 08:30:31, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Aug 07 00:41:52, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > > ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps > > with Opusenc and then decoded the resulting file with Opusdec. > 1) Opusenc --bitrate 12 --downmix-mono Sweep50.wav Sweep50.opus Why are you using a stereo file containing the same sweep in both

Hi I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to compile OK. I've tried with opus-1.0.3 and opus-1.1-beta. The errors are like this:- "undefined reference to `sqrtf'" etc. This OS is Peppermint Three, similar to Ubuntu 12.04. It uses:- gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 Google says it's maybe something to do

Hi I am an Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/) developer and I'd like to see Audacity reading and writing Opus files as easily as it does others. What would you recommend as a way forward for this? I am thinking that (Win) we should ship opusenc.exe and opusdec.exe and send command line stuff to them; that way we wouldn't need to dip into your code and as you update we would

Hi, I have downloaded the latest stable version *1.0.2 opus audio codec* from the following link: http://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/ *Details of OS & CPU:* OS : Microsoft Windows XP CPU : intel core 2 Duo cpu I am using Microsoft visual C++ 2010 Express to build the codec (opus.vcxproj available in the package downloaded). I am able to build it & could generate the application

hello all - since i am such a newbie, i thought i would be the ideal person to put together a guide on how i got the opus tools working. ?i am using virtualbox and a new centOS-linux virtual-machine. i chose to use the minimalist centOS iso file so there would be no pre-installed packages. any suggestions or improvements to this guide would be most appreciated. ?? also, wish to express my

A small patch (attached) to the ogg123 source (dec 15 nightly build from CVS) that implements ranged playback a la: ogg123 -r 12:10-13:00 file.ogg to playback 12m:10s-13m:00s fragment from the file.ogg soundfile. Usage: ogg123 -r hours:minutes:seconds.fraction-hours:minutes:seconds.fraction anything can be pretty much omitted (within reason) [although it does not support hh:mm:ss.hh- ]

Hi, I have downloaded the latest stable version *1.0.2 opus audio codec* from the following link: http://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/ *Details of OS & CPU:* OS : Microsoft Windows XP CPU : intel core 2 Duo cpu I am using Microsoft visual C++ 2010 Express to build the codec (opus.vcxproj available in the package downloaded). I am able to build it & could generate the application

> What sine sweep exactly? An exponential sweep. It started slightly below 24 Hz and ended almost at 24 kHz. And it was 50 seconds long. > How did you obtain it, I used Angelo Farina's "Aurora" modules. One of them is called "Generate sine sweep". > and how exactly did you encode and decode it? 1) Opusenc --bitrate 12 --downmix-mono Sweep50.wav

Hi, Before I comment on the graphics you posted to visualize the difference between two audio signals, I'd like to ask for your help in evaluating my JPEG encoder. I've encoded an image with JPEG and then computed the difference with the original. I then converted the difference to sound. You can listen to the image difference on this clip: https://jmvalin.ca/misc_stuff/diff.wav Can you

Opus is specifically designed to survive tandeming but you need to keep the frames aligned and not mess with the gain, which your tools probably do not do. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:58 PM, encrupted anonymous < sergeinakamoto at gmail.com> wrote: > using iTunes i've noticed that AAC is > very good at re-encoding own lossy sound. > let's test Opus! > > neroaacenc.exe

Hi, Regarding ticket 523 "ogg123 can no longer play from stdin": http://trac.xiph.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/523 It seems that 'cat sample.ogg | ogg123 -' works for me, for ogg123 from svn. Can anyone verify that code has been committed to fix this bug, or is there a different usage that triggers the bug? Conrad.

<div id="contentDescription" style="line-height:1.5;text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"> <div>Thanks to your reply.</div><div><br></div><div>So part of the wiki is out of date? Beside Opus-tools, I also concern about the spec, optimization and future work in wiki. Could you tell me about if they are out