similar to: library for creating Opus files?

Hello Tony, opusenc from opus-tools works for me.. Just tried it successfully on my x86_64 Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 box. I was just able to do $ sudo apt-get install opus-tools $ opusenc music_48kbps.wav music_48kbps.opus I remember also being able to compile opus-tools (git://git.xiph.org/opus-tools.git) some time ago. Regards, Vish On 23 February 2015 at 12:30, Tony <yellowjacketlite at

On 23/02/15 10:30 AM, Tony wrote: > I __think__ opus-tools' opusenc has code which can be used as a > template/sample for how to create an .Ogg file with Opus content. As > expected, it makes use of libopus and libogg. Sadly that's the best option currently. As you say it's a bit complicated, although oggenc has a lot of extra support for controlling encoder options you

I __think__ opus-tools' opusenc has code which can be used as a template/sample for how to create an .Ogg file with Opus content. As expected, it makes use of libopus and libogg. There appears to be quite a few steps involved (several more than I'd expect), but I __think__ this is the only library, or sample code, that shows how to create audio file containing Opus. Too bad there

Hi I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to compile OK. I've tried with opus-1.0.3 and opus-1.1-beta. The errors are like this:- "undefined reference to `sqrtf'" etc. This OS is Peppermint Three, similar to Ubuntu 12.04. It uses:- gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 Google says it's maybe something to do

Hello!, i've just compared the 1.0.3 release with the master branch on a BeagleBone Black (AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 with NEON floating-point accelerator) and Arch Linux ARM. At the moment I dont no why, but I see that 1.1 is much slower in encoding. Are there any default changes, that I missed and could explain this? Normaly I suggested a better performance with 1.1 and the ARM

I have been challenged by someone that opusfile's 48kHz most of the time forced resampling but I didn't have good arguments to counter. I've checked the opus-codec.org pages and Monty's pages without finding good arguments. If you encode files to .opus with opusenc and decode with opusfile's api the sampling rate is constantly 48kHz ignoring output hardware isn't it? Is

Hi All, First time poster to this group, please ignore my ignorance? I?m trying to use Opus 1.1 on a 400MHz MIPS 24k CPU (AR9331, specifically, like in the Arduino Yun). I?ve successfully built (I think) opus-1.1 and opus-tools-1.8 and they run, but are dog slow. opus-1.1 does have the ?enable-fixed-point option set, as this chip only has soft-float. My short test file (less than one

Hi all, I am a developer for embedded system and totally new to Opus and open source audio codec. I'm now using Microchip dsPIC33 to develop a decoder for Opus. I am now using sources of libopus. The first question is for calling opus_decode(), do I need to skip the header bytes of an opus file before I can input the file data to opus_decode()? Or will libopus handle this automatically?

Hi! Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. With Opus I noticed that the file size for 48kHz and 48 kbps compared to 96kHz Vorbis at 31kbps is about double the size and it sounds even worse (than Vorbis) (there is a lot of noise in the lower frequencies when a low

Hello, We have a use case where we want to record an opus RTP stream to a .opus file. We want to fill in any gaps in the stream, and we also want to take advantage of inband FEC whenever possible. The ogg/opus draft describes[1] how to fill in gaps by generating zero-byte frames, but I do not understand how (and if) FEC can be used. Is this possible, and if so, what is the recommended way of

Hi, I have found differences in quality between opus_demo and opusenc/opusdec. I used for both applications the same raw pcm file,16 bit,48khz,litle endian. i use libopus 1.1-beta and opus-tools-0.1.7. The command for opus_demo is: opus_demo audio 48000 1 64000 -cvbr -framesize 10 in.pcm out.pcm For opusenc/dec: opusenc --raw --raw-chan 1 bitrate 64 -cvbr --framesize 10 in.pcm in.opus

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi to everybody. First of all I hope this is the right place to discuss such an (nitpicky) issue. I've just been testing the current Opus release and for mere curiosity compared its performance to WMAPro with CD quality music at low bitrates (48 kbit/s). While Opus generally does a very good job, I found one particular example (a high pitched

Hi! Excuse the delay, but I had to deal with a corrupted NTFS file system that ate many important files on an USB stick... The FLAC version of the original is almost 6MB and it can be downloaded slowly from this time-limited link: https://sbr5vjid0jgmce4q.myfritz.net:40262/nas/filelink.lua?id=0ba5a10529a6fe7b On the meaning of a logarithmic sweep: If you use foobar2000 and the

Hello all, Attached are patches for libopusenc, opusfile and opus-tools in order to provide support for Ambisonics and the Projection API for encoding/decoding channel mapping 253 and 254. Please feel free to ask any questions or give any feedback you might have. :) Cheers, Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I wanted to roughly benchmark how the different version of libopus performed at each complexity level for a 6kbit/s output opus file. This was conducted on a Raspberry Pi so it is a constant hardware platform. This was done on an early Pi so only 256MB RAM but it was never used up so should not make a difference. I compiled the three final versions of each major release of libopus so that was

Hi, Dear alls I had encounted a problem in using opus-tool-0.2-opus-1.3(download from www.opus-codec.org, Win64 binaries: opus-tools-0.2-win64.zip). First, I use opusenc to generate a opus file which input is a 9-channels wav file. The opusenc can work. Then, I use opusdec to transform the generated opus file to wav file, but opusdec can't work. I received the error message: failed to open

Hello, I'm using a libopus enabled ffmpeg version on Kubuntu (Not that this should matter from what I've seen), and i'm interested in adding metadata (Such as Track Title/Artist) to my videos that I convert. How can I do this? I've seen the metadata usage and read the ffmpeg documentation, but I'm still uncertain. I'm currently using command similar to: ffmpeg -ss

Hi everyone, I have profiled Opus on AArch64. I just run opus_demo with some pcm files. Following is time proportion of FFT with different bitrate. Bitrate | Time cost by FFT/iFFT 24kb/s | 15% 48kb/s | 15% 96kb/s | 13% Any comment? I want some data close to real application, any suggestion? Thanks, Phil Wang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Jean The problem is that for using this package I need to use all the libs like ogg, even Speex?, no, and also where i can find an easy example like opus_demo.c to create the .opus file Greetings Toni 2013/10/28 Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> > Hi Toni, > > The package you want is opus-tools. You can get it from the download > section. For file distribution,

Excellent, thanks Tim for writing back so quickly! Cheers, Drew On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > Drew Allen wrote: > >> Please feel free to ask any questions or give any feedback you might >> have. :) >> > > A few comments from a quick glance through the opusfile patch: > > You unconditionally