Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "opus Digest, Vol 72, Issue 17"
2015 Feb 04
0
opus Digest, Vol 72, Issue 17
On 3 February 2015 at 01:31, Phil Wang <Phil.Wang at arm.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have already added support for scaled forward non-power-of-2 floating-point FFT:
> https://github.com/projectNe10/Ne10/commit/79c3d787302f8d74b9bcfe6545d487cdf1b101d9
>
> Two flags are added to cfg structure: is_forward_scaled and is_backward_scaled.
> By setting is_forward_scaled to
2015 Jan 30
1
[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Viswanath Puttagunta wrote:
> Is the peak stack usage a complete blocker in current form?
Since this only affects people who enable NE10, I don't think this is a
blocker.
2015 Jan 29
2
[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Viswanath Puttagunta wrote:
> if OPUS_ARM_NEON_INTR
> CELT_ARM_NEON_INTR_OBJ = $(CELT_SOURCES_ARM_NEON_INTR:.c=.lo) \
> - %test_unit_rotation.o %test_unit_mathops.o
> -$(CELT_ARM_NEON_INTR_OBJ): CFLAGS += $(OPUS_ARM_NEON_INTR_CPPFLAGS)
> + $(CELT_SOURCES_ARM_NE10:.c=.lo) \
> + %test_unit_rotation.o %test_unit_mathops.o \
> +
2015 Mar 03
2
[RFC PATCHv3] Encode optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v2
- fixed compile issue when just compiling for --enable-intrinsics
for ARMv7 without NE10
- Notes for NE10:
- All compile/link warnings are now in upstream NE10
- Only patch pending upstream in NE10 is the one that
needs to add -funsafe-math-optimizations for ARMv7
targets.
- Phil Wang @ ARM is working on getting this fixed.
- Note that even without
2015 Feb 04
4
[RFC PATCH v2] Encode optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v1:
- passing arch parameter explicitly
- reduced stack usage by ~3.5K by using scaled NE10 fft version
- moved all optimization array functions to arm_celt_map.c
- Other cleanups pointed out by Timothy
Phil,
As you mentioned earlier, could you please address all
compile and linker errors/warnings coming out of Ne10 library?
You can find my working Ne10 repo at [1]
You
2015 Jan 20
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Encode optimize using libNE10
Hello opus-dev,
I've been cooking up this patchset to integrate NE10 library into opus.
Current patchset focuses on encode use case mainly effecting performance of
clt_mdct_forward() and opus_fft() (for float only)
Glad to report the following on Encode use case:
(Measured on my Beaglebone Black Cortex-A8 board)
- Performance improvement for encode use case ~= 12.34% (Based on time -p
2015 Mar 03
1
[RFC PATCH v4] Enable optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v3
- Just rebased on tip
- For all else, please see notes from RFC PATCH v3 at
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2015-March/002902.html
- latest wip opus tree/branch
https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/Ne10.git
branch: rfcv4_final_fft_ne10
Viswanath Puttagunta (1):
armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Makefile.am
2015 Apr 28
10
[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hello Timothy / Jean-Marc / opus-dev,
This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1].
In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly
integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus.
You can view my opus wip code at [2].
Note that while I found some issues both with the NE10 library(fixed fft)
and with Linaro toolchain (armv8 intrinsics), the work
2015 Oct 06
3
[RFC V3 7/8] armv7, armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library
I'm trying to get these cleaned up and landed, but I'm running into
some trouble with this patch. Using commit a08b29d88e3c (July 21) of
Ne10, I'm seeing test failures for 60-point FFTs:
nfft=60 inverse=0,snr = -3.312408
** poor snr: -3.312408 **
nfft=60 inverse=1,snr = -16.079597
** poor snr: -16.079597 **
All other sizes tested appear to work fine (84 to 140 dB of SNR). This
2015 May 15
11
[RFC V3 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hi All,
Changes from RFC v2 [1]
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
- Overflow issue fixed by Phil at ARM. Ne10 wip at [2]. Should be upstream soon.
- So, re-enabled using fixed fft for mdct_forward which was disabled in RFCv2
armv7,armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library
- Thanks to Jonathan Lennox, fixed some build fixes on iOS and some copy-paste errors
Rest
2015 May 15
0
[RFC V3 7/8] armv7, armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library
Uses NEON optimized fixed point fft routines in NE10 library
Signed-off-by: Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan at vidyo.com>
---
Makefile.am | 12 +-
celt/arm/arm_celt_map.c | 46 ++--
celt/arm/celt_ne10_fft.c | 98 +++++----
celt/arm/fft_arm.h |
2015 May 08
8
[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 0/8]
Hi All,
As per Timothy's suggestion, disabling mdct_forward
for fixed point. Only effects
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
Rest of patches are same as in [1]
For reference, latest wip code for opus is at [2]
Still working with NE10 team at ARM to get corner cases of
mdct_forward. Will update with another patch
when issue in NE10 gets fixed.
Regards,
Vish
[1]:
2015 Jan 29
0
[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Hi Timothy,
Appreciate the comprehensive code review.
The biggest issue I see is the peak stack usage.... rest looks like
fairly straight forward cleanup.
Is the peak stack usage a complete blocker in current form?
If it is indeed a blocker, would it be acceptable if we can reduce
additional buffer requirement from 2 buffers (current) to 1, possibly
by moving scaling inside
2015 Mar 31
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/5] aarch64: celt_pitch_xcorr: Fixed point series
Hi Timothy,
As I mentioned earlier [1], I now fixed compile issues
with fixed point and resubmitting the patch.
I also have new patch that does intrinsics optimizations
for celt_pitch_xcorr targetting aarch64.
You can find my latest work-in-progress branch at [2]
For reference, you can use the Ne10 pre-built libraries
at [3]
Note that I am working with Phil at ARM to get my patch at [4]
2015 May 08
0
[[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 1/8] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10
library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward
and related functions.
This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON
VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7.
Official ARM NE10 library page available at
http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/
To enable this optimization, use
--enable-intrinsics
2015 Feb 04
0
[RFC PATCH v2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10
library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward
and related functions.
This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON
VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7.
Official ARM NE10 library page available at
http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/
To enable this optimization, use
--enable-intrinsics
2015 Mar 03
0
[RFC PATCHv3] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10
library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward
and related functions.
This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON
VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7.
Official ARM NE10 library page available at
http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/
To enable this optimization, use
--enable-intrinsics
2015 May 08
2
(no subject)
Hello Jean-Marc,
Below are the results that show test_unit_dft passes, but
test_unit_mdct fails (only for nfft=480, 960, 1920)
Note: Tested on BeagleboneBlack(Cortex-A8) fixed point on branch [1]
./test_unit_dft
nfft=32 inverse=0,snr = 88.394372
nfft=32 inverse=1,snr = 93.896470
nfft=128 inverse=0,snr = 89.185895
nfft=128 inverse=1,snr = 93.537021
nfft=256 inverse=0,snr = 88.353151
nfft=256
2015 Mar 18
5
[RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Enable aarch64 intrinsics/Ne10
Hi All,
Since I continue to base my work on top of Jonathan's patch,
and my previous Ne10 fft/ifft/mdct_forward/backward patches,
I thought it would be better to just post all new patches
as a patch series. Please let me know if anyone disagrees
with this approach.
You can see wip branch of all latest patches at
https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/opus.git
Branch:
2015 May 08
1
(no subject)
Hello Jean-Marc,
Yep, that was it.. with your patch, test_unit_mdct passes for all nfft.
So, what you do you suggest the next step here is?
Regards,
Vish
On 8 May 2015 at 12:30, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you apply this change to the MDCT test and run it again. See if more
> (all) sizes pass. Given the results, I strongly suspect an