similar to: Estimating bitrate during a real-time voip call

Hi Dragos, The issue is that not all packet loss maybe congestion related. Often, reducing bitrate seems to have no impact on improving packet loss. Thanks, Manpreet. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Dragos Oancea <droancea at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi > > You can start a VOIP call with 50 kbps bitrate and reduce the bitrate if > there is packet loss. You know if

Hi You can start a VOIP call with 50 kbps bitrate and reduce the bitrate if there is packet loss. ?You know if there's packet loss if you receive RTCP .?Linphone does this . Regards,Dragos Oancea From: Manpreet Singh <manpreets7 at gmail.com> To: opus at xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:54 AM Subject: [opus] Estimating bitrate during a real-time voip call Hi,

Hello, Is FEC supposed to work in NARROWBAND mode ?(with maxaveragebitrate=12000; maxplaybackrate=8000 ) ?I am having some confusing results, it appears that FEC is enabled in the encoder, but the decoder cannot find any packet with FEC. I am also wondering if this piece of code is correct (webrtc): /* The following is to parse the LBRR flags. */? if (opus_packet_parse(payload,

Thanks Dragos, I assume I will be setting those parameters during initialization of encoder right? Question is, if connection gets too lossy, how will opus adapt to it? Can it automatically shift bitrate down to minimize impact? Mark from IRC suggests that the app has to be aware of the losses and change it on the fly. Has anybody on the list tried this? Kelvin Chua On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:53

Hi, another question on the same topic Speex resampler at 44.1kHz seems to be very CPU intensive on Android (even more than the Opus encoder) While Speex at 48kHz is just fine. I wonder any alternate solutions or ideas ? Improve it, look for alternate solution ... I am guessing the NEON optimization are still used for both, etc. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at

I am using libopus for my implementation. I wonder if anybody in the list have any experience on how to make libopus dynamically adjust its bitrate? On Mar 3, 2015 10:42 PM, "Benjamin Schwartz" <benjamin.m.schwartz at gmail.com> wrote: > It sounds like your software isn't adjusting the opus bitrate in response > to network conditions. For example, many WebRTC

Hi, I noticed that speex.org has a banner that mentions that Opus is better than Speex in all aspects. The supported bitrate range for Speex seems to be as low as 2kbps though but Opus can only go as low as 6kbps. Is this one aspect where Speex is still preferred? (I understand that it's not a very common scenario though). Thanks, Manpreet. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

I have two networked pcs. pc 1- RH8.0 which came with Samba-backend 1.0.8 and Samba 2.2.5 pc 2- XP Home I am able to access the shared folders from pc2 on pc1. However from pc2 I can not even see the ressources of pc1. In My Network Places/Entire Network/Microsoft Windows Network/"My Workgroup" I can see "pc1" but when I click on it I get an error message: \\"pc1"

On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 04:18 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:16:58AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for the stable branch for vdpa fixes in the vhost tree [1]. > > There > > are 3 branches that seem identical: linux-next, test and vhost. linux-next > > seems > > to be -next branch. Which one would

On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 11:59 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:08?PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 07:15:31AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > >

Hi, I am looking for the stable branch for vdpa fixes in the vhost tree [1]. There are 3 branches that seem identical: linux-next, test and vhost. linux-next seems to be -next branch. Which one would be the stable branch? [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git Thanks, Dragos

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:08?PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 07:15:31AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 15:26 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >

On 2023-05-04 a.m.9:50, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is > valid. This patch adds the check. > > Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism") > Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal at nvidia.com>

The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is valid. This patch adds the check. Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism") Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal at nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea at nvidia.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1

On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 15:26 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:07:38PM +0300, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > > The ndev was accessed on shutdown without a check if it actually exists. > > > > This

Hi Kelvin, The audio bandpass setting is only configurable when the encoder is instantiated (eg: start of a Voip call ) , but you can change the bitrate anytime.For example if you can read incoming RTCP packets , you can check if there's reported packet loss , and then lower the bitrate accordingly.Yes, the app has to be aware of the packetloss ?percentage. Cheers,Dragos From: Kelvin

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 07:15:31AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 15:26 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:07:38PM +0300, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > > > The ndev

On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 13:08 -0400, Feng Liu wrote: > > > On 2023-05-04 a.m.9:50, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > > > > The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is > > valid. This patch adds the check. > > > > Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:16:58AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for the stable branch for vdpa fixes in the vhost tree [1]. There > are 3 branches that seem identical: linux-next, test and vhost. linux-next seems > to be -next branch. Which one would be the stable branch? > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git > >

Ok, I will try there too. So, this is not Dovecot related ? Pacher Dragos -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: 30 June 2015 13:00 To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: Outlook 2013 not fetching new mail/synchronization issues On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:29:38 +0300, Dragos Pacher stated: >There were new emails overnight and