similar to: Multi-frame packet support in opus_demo

Hi, I have found differences in quality between opus_demo and opusenc/opusdec. I used for both applications the same raw pcm file,16 bit,48khz,litle endian. i use libopus 1.1-beta and opus-tools-0.1.7. The command for opus_demo is: opus_demo audio 48000 1 64000 -cvbr -framesize 10 in.pcm out.pcm For opusenc/dec: opusenc --raw --raw-chan 1 bitrate 64 -cvbr --framesize 10 in.pcm in.opus

Hi All, I have taken ITU standard 48KHz female voice file and Encoded using opus_demo by giving follwoing arguments. opus_demo -e audio 48000 1 32000 female1.pcm female1frame.opus And using repacketiser tried to pack 6frames/packet(6*20msec=120msec). While packing I observed below error for 3 times. Error: opus_repacketizer_cat() failed: corrupted stream when i inspect the encoded file, it

Hi I used opus_demo to clarify how opus works, I try this command: opus_demo -e" audio 8000 1 8000 -cbr /somedirectory/pcm_mono_ochomil.raw /somedirectory/test.opus And I get the file test.opus, then comes the first problem, this file hasn't header so i can't reproduce it using an external tool, how can i add a header to this file Then when i trie to run opus_demo -d 8000 1

--- src/opus_demo.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/opus_demo.c b/src/opus_demo.c index 72506b5..5a75679 100644 --- a/src/opus_demo.c +++ b/src/opus_demo.c @@ -245,14 +245,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) double bits=0.0, bits_max=0.0, bits_act=0.0, bits2=0.0, nrg; double tot_samples=0; opus_uint64 tot_in, tot_out; - int

Hello! I encoded a voice file (48kHz) with opusbin\opusenc.exe with the standard settings and decoded it. The output was amazing. I could not hear any loss at all. Then i encoded the same file with opus_demo.exe and standard settings and then decoded it. The output had a sizzling noise, even when I used full bandwidth. I think I have played around with any of the settings in opus_demo.exe,

Daniel Ballenger wrote: > I'm pretty sure that the protocol used by icecast is TCP so you also > have the overhead from TCP to add, though in the end, the overhead > probably isn't enough to be really noticed. > > -Daniel Do that for a few hundred connections, and the overhead can add up to something more significant. I'm basing this on a theoretical maximum of an

Hello! I am running opus_demo.exe with the following cmds: -e audio 48000 1 16 -cbr m:\test\test1.raw m:\test\test1.opus When I open the .opus file with a hex editor, I see only

Hello all, after FOMS I decided to take a look at the opus library and I found that I could improve a bit the build system and cleanup the code a little bit. Most of the changes to the code has been suggested by my two tools cowstats and missingstatic (part of the ruby-elf gem if you care). HTH, Diego

I have run a few more test at different bitrates and 1.1 is looking even worse in terms of speed compared to previous versions. I have shared a google sheet which has the raw data and charts for 6,16 and 32 kbps. Unfortunately you cannot show proper error bars on Google sheets but the standard deviation is in the data if you want to look. You can see that the profile for 1.1 is a lot different

Hi, I am interested in this part of the answer: "Make sure both are also linked to the same libopus (opusenc could be using the system libopus 1.0.x while opus_demo is from git)" I dowloaded a tarball distrib of libopus (1.1-beta),build and installed it,and afterwards did the same with opus-tools (0.1.7),using the former installed libopus library (also using libogg 1.3.1). When I execute

I suspect the main difference is due to time alignment of the samples and the exact trimming at the beginning and at the end of the encoded files. I also note that there's a missing "--" in front of "bitrate" and only one "-" instead of two for cvbr in your opusenc command line. Make sure both are also linked to the same libopus (opusenc could be using the system

This patch lets you pass paths for opus_demo and opus_compare to the run_vectors.sh script. The motivation for this was for my aarch64 patches (forthcoming), which I've been testing under qemu. I want to run an emulated opus_demo, but a native opus_compare, so the script completes in a reasonable amount of time. --- tests/run_vectors.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Hi All, What would be interesting would be a plot of complexity versus subjective or object audio quality. I've not had a chance to look at the new analysis code in 1.1 so maybe in the case of a 6kbps compression you could clarify what decisions would it be making that would justify the extra complexity? Best Regards Cliff Parris -----Original Message----- From: opus-request at

On 2013-10-21 5:08 AM, Antonio Juan wrote: > I used opus_demo to clarify how opus works, I try this command: > > opus_demo -e" audio 8000 1 8000 -cbr > /somedirectory/pcm_mono_ochomil.raw /somedirectory/test.opus opus_demo doesn't support .opus files. It uses a special raw format just for testing. You want opusenc and opusdec from the opus-tools package. -r

Hi, When running opus_demo with FEC enabled, there is a bug related to the length of FEC frames. The FEC frames will be decoded with a length of max_frame_size and the resulting output file will be much longer than the input file.

Hi all, This is Linfeng Zhang from Google. I'll work on ARM NEON optimization in the next few months. I'm submitting 2 patches in the following couple of emails, which have the new created celt_fir_neon(). I revised celt_fir_c() to not pass in argument "mem" in Patch 1. If there are concerns to this change, please let me know. Many thanks to your comments. Linfeng Zhang

Hi All, Need Help ! I am interested testing opus codec encoding decoding qaulity. for this have complied opus code codec from souce. After compiling i got opus_demo app. for Encoding i followed below steps: 1) Reference file used music_orig.wav (http://www.opus-codec.org/examples/samples/music_orig.wav) Number of samples : 4358219 (90.8 s) 2015-04-13 10:40:07 UTC Sampling

I wonder if anybody try to compress a pure sine wave using OPUS codec. When I compressed the mono 1KHz, 16bits 48000 samples per sec. audio stream using the 'opus_demo' utility: opus_demo -e audio 48000 1 2min_1kHz_Sine_16bit_48kHz.wave 2min_1kHz_Sine_16bit_48kHz.opus_raw I had the output stream that is shown below. 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 78 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 78 00 00 00 01 00

On 21 November 2014 at 18:06, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > > Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: >> >> a. Simplest use case to validate this optimization for correctness. >> b. Simplest use case to validate this optimization for performance. >> >> Would prefer something like opusdec that can be executed on command >> line. > >

Hello All, We have been doing an optimised port of OPUS to a ARM Cortex A9. We are currently measuring between 20 and 90 MCPS for our code running on a Panda board (single core), this covers all bit-rates,sample rates for stereo coding (encode + decode) under normal operation. As Marc says complexity can be controlled via the API with our higher figure corresponding to the default setting of