similar to: how to Build .opus file

Hi Jean The problem is that for using this package I need to use all the libs like ogg, even Speex?, no, and also where i can find an easy example like opus_demo.c to create the .opus file Greetings Toni 2013/10/28 Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> > Hi Toni, > > The package you want is opus-tools. You can get it from the download > section. For file distribution,

Thanks for your help, I will follow that, so in order to sum up I need: - libopus 1.0.3 compiled as static or shared library - libogg 1.3.1 compiled as static or shared library - opus-tools 0.1.7 and then follow the example in opus-tools opusenc.c to get things ready, because if I try to compile opus-tools, this ask for me for the speex library, and other things I think that that will we all.

On 10/28/2013 01:37 PM, Antonio Juan wrote: > The problem is that for using this package I need to use all the libs > like ogg, even Speex?, You do not need Speex. You do need libogg because .opus files *are* Ogg files. > no, and also where i can find an easy example > like opus_demo.c to create the .opus file There's an easy example called opusenc in the opus-tools package :-)

Hi Toni, The package you want is opus-tools. You can get it from the download section. For file distribution, always use opusenc (or equivalent), never opus_demo. Cheers, Jean-Marc On 10/28/2013 11:34 AM, Antonio Juan wrote: > Hi all! > > Using the code in opus_demo.c I write a c program for encode and decode > the audio from one microphone, I can encode and decode raw audio

Hello Tim I am referring to the following file https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sample_of_%22Another_Day_in_Paradise%22.ogg I opened the file in a HEX editor. I do not see the string OpusHead in the packet. It starts with Oggs. Also checking the occurrence of Oggs, I see that the first packet has BOS, the next all (except last) have 00 (which is not defined in the RFC as continuation) and

Hi I used opus_demo to clarify how opus works, I try this command: opus_demo -e" audio 8000 1 8000 -cbr /somedirectory/pcm_mono_ochomil.raw /somedirectory/test.opus And I get the file test.opus, then comes the first problem, this file hasn't header so i can't reproduce it using an external tool, how can i add a header to this file Then when i trie to run opus_demo -d 8000 1

On 05/11/2016 12:35 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > I ran the opusenc.exe on a wave file and checked the OpusTag section. My > concern is on Total Segment Size being >> than the actual data being > put. Is this just an example of implementation or does a size of 764 > BYTES kept as a place holder for putting more data? Yes, opusenc does reserve some space in the header so that tags can

Hello all, I'm currently in the process of implementing a mixing matrix into the header of OPUS files for the proposed channel mapping 3 seen here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-03#section-3.2 My implementation simply replaces writing the stream mapping char array with the Q15 col-wise matrix vals described in the above document. I'm able to write/read matrices

On 10/05/16 02:37 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows > up Vorbis but not Opus. The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01 value in an extra byte after the last tag. The OpusTag packet layout is described in

Hi, I have downloaded the latest stable version *1.0.2 opus audio codec* from the following link: http://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/ *Details of OS & CPU:* OS : Microsoft Windows XP CPU : intel core 2 Duo cpu I am using Microsoft visual C++ 2010 Express to build the codec (opus.vcxproj available in the package downloaded). I am able to build it & could generate the application

>>> Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> schrieb am 11.05.2016 um 19:32 in Nachricht <CAEyg9sjvTWMBMMCJ8HQcYmbv1BtNt54CgpqWaGNm02MWrKcxaQ at mail.gmail.com>: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > So for the moment we can assume that this method is also OK to use? > > On Embedded Systems, both SRAM and Flash can be a restricting factor > besides the compute time. To

I would like to be able to add/modify tags (like artist, album, title) to opus files. The opusenc utility does a fine job of creating tags when creating opus files, but I would like to be able to modify existing opus files from the command line. vorbiscomment can add tags to existing ogg files, but it doesn't work with opus files. Does anyone have a solution for this? Thanks, Chris

Hi Amit, I'm not sure what you're trying to ask, but the reserved space in the header is an optional thing. Encoders are free to do it, but are not required to do so. Jean-Marc On 05/11/2016 01:32 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > So for the moment we can assume that this method is also OK to use? > > On Embedded Systems, both SRAM and Flash can be a

Hi, I have found differences in quality between opus_demo and opusenc/opusdec. I used for both applications the same raw pcm file,16 bit,48khz,litle endian. i use libopus 1.1-beta and opus-tools-0.1.7. The command for opus_demo is: opus_demo audio 48000 1 64000 -cvbr -framesize 10 in.pcm out.pcm For opusenc/dec: opusenc --raw --raw-chan 1 bitrate 64 -cvbr --framesize 10 in.pcm in.opus

Hello All, When going through the Ogg format, I have a basic question. As per the RFC the Ogg format encapsulates the logical stream. Now consider the scenario where a raw mono stream is being encoded with Opus Codec. The stream is 48KHz and the length of the stream being encoded is worth 20ms of data. This makes it 960 half words (considering 16 bit format). Now if the final output is say 100

The overhead of Ogg (in file size) is pretty small and it's efficient enough for most applications (and uses far less CPU than the codec anyway). If anything, you might want to look at optimizing the existing Ogg implementation (e.g. like Tremor did in the context of Vorbis). Of course, you're always free to design a new container, but I doubt it's worth it and it's a lot of work

>>> Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 17:47 in Nachricht <CAEyg9sgjbsxQY-=VnhQrKiGeTcFSRr1wxOPUhNyCQF8Piuahow at mail.gmail.com>: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > Assuming that a 48KHz, 20ms 8-bit linear PCM data which is 960 bytes is > compressed to 64 bytes (for assumption). The with the Oggs header (4 byte) Actually what I don't

Hello! I encoded a voice file (48kHz) with opusbin\opusenc.exe with the standard settings and decoded it. The output was amazing. I could not hear any loss at all. Then i encoded the same file with opus_demo.exe and standard settings and then decoded it. The output had a sizzling noise, even when I used full bandwidth. I think I have played around with any of the settings in opus_demo.exe,

On 05/12/2016 10:35 AM, Amit Ashara wrote: > For HMI panels, except for the capture pattern and a single page segment > entry, other fields are not important, and which results in almost 7% > overhead for a 20ms raw frame encoded with Opus. I'm not sure how you get a 7% overhead. In most uses I've seen, the overhead is more around 1%. > At the same time the > file

Hello Tim, Jean-Marc Thanks for the clarification. Let me study the sample OPUS file and see if my understanding is now clarified. Regards Amit On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > Amit Ashara wrote: > >> I am referring to the following file >> >> >>