similar to: ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool

Hi Rhishi, PQevalaudio is very unreliable and buggy. I have compared to PEAQ and - as a result - now I am not using it anymore. With best regards, Christian Hoene Von: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] Im Auftrag von Rhishikesh Agashe Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013 12:35 An: opus at xiph.org Cc: Rasmi Mishra Betreff: [opus] ODG (Objective Difference

In that case, can you please suggest a reliable tool? Thanks, Rhishi From: Christian Hoene [mailto:christian.hoene at symonics.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 17:30 To: Rhishikesh Agashe; opus at xiph.org Cc: Rasmi Mishra Subject: AW: [opus] ODG (Objective Difference Grade) scores for Opus Encoder using PQEvalAudio Tool Hi Rhishi, PQevalaudio is very unreliable and buggy. I have compared

Hi, While testing the Opus Decoder we came across the following: If the decoder encounters an 'Invalid Payload Length' the decoding of the stream is stopped. Also, when the decoder encounters 'Range coder state mismatch', the decoding of the stream is stopped. I believe that it should reject the erroneous payload and start decoding the next payload for it to work properly in a

Hi, We have observed that the stack usage in Opus Encoder/Decoder is enormous(50-60Kb approx). As we all know, in embedded systems, high stack usage is discouraged. How are we planning to take care of that? One idea is to allocate the required memory on heap and pass it on as an argument to the main Opus API and allocate the internal buffers used by the internal modules on the allocated buffer.

Hi Dean, It should work for 24kec, 34kc and 74kc cores. Thanks and Regards, Rhishi -----Original Message----- From: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Dean Blackketter Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 02:37 To: Jean-Marc Valin Cc: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] MIPS optimizations Great, will do and report back. On Jun 22, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Jean-Marc

Thanks for the answer. I'll take a look at this tool and verify my implementation. But I'd like to clarify the moment. If the following is applied for a test vector Reference Float Point Encoder --> Reference Float Point Decoder --> Float Point Output Reference Fixed Point Encoder --> Reference Float Point Decoder --> Fixed Point Output And then, if Float Point Output and

Hi, I am new to the Opus community. I intend to optimize Opus encoder/decoder for MIPS and commit the changes to the Opus repository for it be included in Android. Can somebody point me how to go about it? A pointer to a previous mail thread with a similar discussion might help. Thanks and Regards, Rhishikesh Agashe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi, I'm working on porting libopus and I'd like to get information how to test Opus Encoder properly. There is information in RFC6716, that Opus Decoder's test files (http://opus-codec.org/testvectors/opus_testvectors.tar.gz) were created specifically to exercise all aspects of the decoder. Using these files, a custom implementation of libopus can be verified to be sure the Opus

Hi Ralph, Gentle reminder.. Regards, Rhishi -----Original Message----- From: Rhishikesh Agashe Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 11:02 To: 'Ralph Giles' Subject: RE: [opus] Need info on optimizing Opus code for a particular core/processor Hi Ralph, Can you let me know how to submit my code for review? What is the procedure? Also, could you create an account for the same let me know

Yeah I see the definition, but unlike USE_ALLOCA and VAR_ARRAYS, it has not been used/set anywhere in the code for allocating buffers! Regards, Rhishi -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:00 To: Rhishikesh Agashe Cc: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] Regarding stack usage in Opus Actually, the code already has

Actually, the code already has an option for using the heap rather than the stack, see NONTHREADSAFE_PSEUDOSTACK in the code. As the name implies, it's not thread-safe though. Cheers, Jean-Marc On 20/09/13 01:29 AM, Rhishikesh Agashe wrote: > Hi, > > > > We have observed that the stack usage in Opus Encoder/Decoder is > enormous(50-60Kb approx). As we all know, in

On 06/12/2013 12:21 PM, SG wrote: > Is there any test files created specifically to exercise all aspects > of the encoder? If not, can you recommend some steps to verify a > custom implementation of libopus in encoding mode ? There is no test for the encoder because unlike the decoder, it is not normatively specified and it keeps improving over time. The best way to check your encoder

Guys, I am getting lock error box in Officer 2007 and windows 7. It shows the somebody is using this file, but I am sure that is not. That problem always happens when open 2 files in the same folder. Take a look my lock configuration: kernel oplocks = No kernel oplocks = False locking = Yes oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No oplocks = False

hi all i want to provide audio recording facility with my Ror application , which can be stored in DB at server , for later use can anybody tell, how to implement this with RoR, as i dont hav much idea abt that thanx --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hi, We're testing CELT (version 0.7.1) error resilience capability. We've used already celtdec packet-loss options. Hence we know what to expect in case of whole packet loss. How does Celt respond to a broken encoded packet? Is it always better to discard it and decode the missing frame through decode_lost? We have the hardware capability of protecting the frame with multiple CRCs.

What's the current state of hardware support for Ogg Vorbis? Any decent players out there? I have an iRiver iHP-120 and am thinking about upgrading, any recommendations? Phil Hibbs. Capgemini is a trading name used by the Capgemini Group of companies which includes Capgemini UK plc, a company registered in England and Wales (number 943935) whose registered is at No. 1 Forge End,

I have been trying some different sample rate and bitrate combinations to get a feel for how CELT behaves. I then encoded it with a couple of different frame sizes and sample rates. There were some small differences, but nothing horrible. So, I decided to run with 24KHz sample rate with 16 bit samples. This seemed like a reasonable tradeoff against the quality degradation that my folks

I am looking to create an intranet document management solution that would take advantage of Ruby/Rails/Subversion etc. I want to get away from document management using MS Word, Excel etc. Can anyone recommend a direction I should investigate? I am currently gathering information on Docbook, Latex, ODF,ODT,ODG,ODP, TinyMCE and others as I find them. Ideally I would like to convert manuals

On 06/01/2016 02:06 PM, Felicia Lim wrote: > That was my intention with refactoring out the subframe encoding and > repacketizing bit. Or do you mean I should merge the explicit check for > 120 ms frame and the existing checks for 40/60 ms wideband? What I mean is that this line in opus_encoder.c: if (frame_size > st->Fs/50 && (st->mode == MODE_CELT_ONLY ||

Hi, a first set of results can be downloaded here <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults More will be added soon. Thanks to Patrick Schreiner and Alfons Martin, who did the tests. With best regards, Christian Hoene Symonics GmbH Sand 13 72076 T?bingen Tel +49 7071 5681302