similar to: Strange ogginfo result

Am 08.12.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Oliver Heinz: > > > Am 08.12.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:52:53 +0100 >> Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to get Samba 4 AD to work with rfc2307 extensions. >>> >>> wbinfo -i fails >>> >>> root at m1:~#

Am 08.12.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:44:16 +0100 > Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 08.12.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Oliver Heinz: >>> >>> Am 08.12.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:52:53 +0100 >>>> Oliver Heinz via

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:52:53 +0100 Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to get Samba 4 AD to work with rfc2307 extensions. > > wbinfo -i fails > > root at m1:~# wbinfo -i SAMDOM\\demo01 > > failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND > > > winbindd.log it here: http://pastebin.com/X0rEaLt2 > >

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:44:16 +0100 Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 08.12.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Oliver Heinz: > > > > > > Am 08.12.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:52:53 +0100 > >> Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >

I'm trying to get Samba 4 AD to work with rfc2307 extensions. wbinfo -i fails root at m1:~# wbinfo -i SAMDOM\\demo01 failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND winbindd.log it here: http://pastebin.com/X0rEaLt2 Pretty much everything else seems to work: root at m1:~# wbinfo --ping-dc checking the NETLOGON for domain[SAMDOM] dc connection to "dc1.samdom.example.com"

Am 08.12.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:52:53 +0100 > Oliver Heinz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm trying to get Samba 4 AD to work with rfc2307 extensions. >> >> wbinfo -i fails >> >> root at m1:~# wbinfo -i SAMDOM\\demo01 >> >> failed to call wbcGetpwnam:

On 08/12/2016 13:44, Oliver Heinz wrote: > So I gave Domain Users 99999 and voilà: > > root at m1:~# wbinfo -i SAMDOM\\demo01 > SAMDOM\demo01:*:10000:99999:demo01:/home/demo01:/bin/bash > > Seems samba always uses the primaryGroupID which for demo01 is set to > 'Domain Users'. Im just wondering a bit then why there is a gidNumber > as an user attribute, as it is

> On 9 Dec 2016, at 17:54, Brian Candler via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 08/12/2016 13:44, Oliver Heinz wrote: >> So I gave Domain Users 99999 and voilà: >> >> root at m1:~# wbinfo -i SAMDOM\\demo01 >> SAMDOM\demo01:*:10000:99999:demo01:/home/demo01:/bin/bash >> >> Seems samba always uses the primaryGroupID which for demo01

opusdec -V opusdec opus-tools f2a2e88 (using libopus unknown) I've got an opus file encoded from a .wav off a cd, 44100Hz: opusinfo 2-24-Overture_in_C_\(In_Memoriam\).opus Processing file "2-24-Overture_in_C_(In_Memoriam).opus"... New logical stream (#1, serial: 38134f1f): type opus Encoded with libopus unknown User comments section follows... ENCODER=opusenc from opus-tools

>On 11/20/2013 03:37 PM, O'Connor, Kevin wrote: >> I have an application I intend to use Opus for that involves creating >> recordings of two-party conversations where each party is saved as a >> separate channel. Audio may be later processed or analyzed on a >> per-party basis so if audio in one channel affects the other channel, it >> could create problems.

Hi, I think I might have kind of, sort of found a bug in opusenc. But do correct me if I am worng. :) When converting an FLAC file that contains RG tags written by bs1770gain the resulting opus file has a way, way too high RG value. I am talking >90dB(!). Here is the metaflac output of the flac file: % metaflac --block-number=2 --list bs.1770/test.flac METADATA block #2 type: 4

Hi! Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. With Opus I noticed that the file size for 48kHz and 48 kbps compared to 96kHz Vorbis at 31kbps is about double the size and it sounds even worse (than Vorbis) (there is a lot of noise in the lower frequencies when a low

On 15/02/15 18:27, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello John, > > Am 15.02.2015 um 18:56 schrieb John Lewis: >> I need to create a couple of OUs under Users to separate my internal >> users from my external users that have LDAP backed accounts so I can put >> ACLs over the external users so I can limit what they can see on the >> tree. What options do I have to create the

switch between speech and music encoding rather quickly. I wanted to try that for a CD track that has a vocal (talk) introduction = followed by music (just two instruments). Using foobar2000 with some custom setup for Opus, I tried VBR encoding = with a 256kbps setting (opus-tools-0.1.9-win32). My expectation was that = the bitrate would be significantly lower than 256kbps while speech is =

Hello, I am trying to encode an Opus file with Ambisonics including Head-Locked (non-diegetic) Stereo sound for a Virtual Reality 360° video. YouTube describes the spatial audio requirements here: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6395969 It's the last list item 5. > 5. Supported First Order Ambisonics (FOA) with Head-Locked Stereo format: > W, Y, Z, X, L, R as a 6-channel

(Please wrap your lines.) On Oct 26 01:38:34, Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: > Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. Can you please post the original wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per

>>> Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> schrieb am 05.11.2018 um 11:05 in Nachricht <20181105100534.GB44329 at www.stare.cz>: > (Are we off‑list now by intention?) No, just fooled by the list defaults (some need just reply, others need reply to all) > >> Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone > appears in the audible spectrum?

Hi! Excuse the delay, but I had to deal with a corrupted NTFS file system that ate many important files on an USB stick... The FLAC version of the original is almost 6MB and it can be downloaded slowly from this time-limited link: https://sbr5vjid0jgmce4q.myfritz.net:40262/nas/filelink.lua?id=0ba5a10529a6fe7b On the meaning of a logarithmic sweep: If you use foobar2000 and the

Hi! I'd like to ask whether someone did test Opus in real-world VOIP (SIP). Did someone e.g. some characterization about sending faxes or DTFM through Opus? Does it work and if yes for which bitrates? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20130518/907c5cbf/attachment.htm

Hello, I'd like to ask whether there is some documentation with recommended parameters for transcoding voice codecs such as G722, G711a/u <-> Opus with near-transparency. My Idea is to have something like: HW-Phone <-> Asterisk <---------> Asterisk <-> HW-Phone (G722) (Opus) (G722) in order to lower the bandwidth between the two