similar to: Encoder state management - 'chunked' Opus?

David Holroyd wrote: > My code does not recreate encoder state per-frame, but it does create > new state at the start of each 'chunk' (where a chunk is 1 second of > consecutive Opus frames, right now). Is this an unsupported use of the > codec (and therefore a potential source of my issue), or should this > have little impact on the output other than reduced efficiency?

Hello!, i've just compared the 1.0.3 release with the master branch on a BeagleBone Black (AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 with NEON floating-point accelerator) and Arch Linux ARM. At the moment I dont no why, but I see that 1.1 is much slower in encoding. Are there any default changes, that I missed and could explain this? Normaly I suggested a better performance with 1.1 and the ARM

Hello, I am testing the command line based opus encoder/decoder tools and I have some questions regarding the information given by the encoder (see below as an example). Encoding using libopus 1.0.2 (audio) ----------------------------------------------------- Input: 48kHz 1 channel Output: 1 channel (1 uncoupled) 20ms packets, 64kbit/sec VBR Preskip: 312 Encoding complete

Hi All, First time poster to this group, please ignore my ignorance? I?m trying to use Opus 1.1 on a 400MHz MIPS 24k CPU (AR9331, specifically, like in the Arduino Yun). I?ve successfully built (I think) opus-1.1 and opus-tools-1.8 and they run, but are dog slow. opus-1.1 does have the ?enable-fixed-point option set, as this chip only has soft-float. My short test file (less than one

Hi! Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. With Opus I noticed that the file size for 48kHz and 48 kbps compared to 96kHz Vorbis at 31kbps is about double the size and it sounds even worse (than Vorbis) (there is a lot of noise in the lower frequencies when a low

I have just started trying Opus with a view to using it in a project. I am interested in embedded hardware and tried it on the Raspberry Pi using the raspbian distro. The version of libopus in the repos is 0.9.14. I installed this and tried encoding 2 minutes of speech from a librevox recording. It managed this at a respectable pace for complexity 10: Skipping chunk of type "LIST",

Hi. I assume that I am deeply stupid and have missed something obvious, but why does this bare-bones code not generate a valid (If trivial) opus file? Running opusinfo I ge the following which I interpret this to mean that not even the first packet gets a pass: New logical stream (#1, serial: 1f0cce42): type opus WARNING: Could not decode Opus header packet 0 - invalid Opus stream (1) WARNING:

Christian, I will give 64kbit/s a try and post the figures. My own project is voice only and requires low bitrate so was hoping that it was just the way I was compiling and not an actual regression in speed for SILK. The raspberry PI is quite a cheap and handy reference platform though the ARM side is fairly underpowered but has a great GPU. It also has no audio in which is a pain for playing

On Aug 07 08:30:31, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Aug 07 00:41:52, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > > ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps > > with Opusenc and then decoded the resulting file with Opusdec. > 1) Opusenc --bitrate 12 --downmix-mono Sweep50.wav Sweep50.opus Why are you using a stereo file containing the same sweep in both

On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, RJ Atkinson wrote: > At 06:26 27/04/01, Tom Wu wrote: > >For those of you who were following the discussion about the new draft > >and implementation of SRP-based password authentication in OpenSSH, I > >promised to have Stanford issue the IETF an official, explicit, > >statement reiterating the unencumbered royalty-free licensing terms. > >The

I had expected that the default bitrate for the encoder would be the same as setting it to OPUS_AUTO, but I'm getting difference results: >opusenc --comp 4 sample.wav sample.opus Encoding using libopus 1.3-rc2 (audio) ----------------------------------------------------- Input: 8 kHz, 1 channel Output: 1 channel (1 uncoupled) 20ms packets, 25 kbit/s VBR Preskip: 312

Hi! Excuse the delay, but I had to deal with a corrupted NTFS file system that ate many important files on an USB stick... The FLAC version of the original is almost 6MB and it can be downloaded slowly from this time-limited link: https://sbr5vjid0jgmce4q.myfritz.net:40262/nas/filelink.lua?id=0ba5a10529a6fe7b On the meaning of a logarithmic sweep: If you use foobar2000 and the

On Aug 07 00:41:52, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps > with Opusenc and then decoded the resulting file with Opusdec. What sine sweep exactly? How did you obtain it, and how exactly did you encode and decode it? Jan > The strange > thing was that even though the output wave file was at 48 kHz, it

Hi, All. I''ve developed the small javascript library to make the widgets "resizable". Please try attached file or following URL URL: http://221.112.61.214/~kzk/others/mixi/resizer.html Now I wish script.aculo.us developers to merge this into the "script.aculo.us". Is there any chance of merge? Is this a right place to ask this question? Thanks in advance. Kazuki

The way things are now, input_userauth_request() calls the authmethod, and then does a bunch of checks, like the special case for root. If an authmethod requires a challenge-response conversation, these checks are skipped, unless they are duplicated by the authmethod. For example, in auth2-chall.c, some of the code is duplicated (logging, sending the reply), but the root special case is skipped.

Does anybody use openbsd-compat/vis.c? Not at the moment I think: % find . -name '*.[ch]' -exec grep -l "vis *(" {} \; ./openbsd-compat/vis.c ./openbsd-compat/vis.h % find . -name '*.[ch]' -exec grep -l VIS_ {} \; ./includes.h ./openbsd-compat/vis.c ./openbsd-compat/vis.h The reason I ask is, AT&T's graphviz package includes a vis.h, and when I try to compile

I was having a discussion with a MS person about the performance of NT. I got this reply: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- By the way, I looked into that claim that Linux could outperform NT server, and my source claimed that the test was done on different hardware (i.e. it was rigged) and that Linux still loses to NT on equivalent HW, although "it has gotten closer." Do you

The latest snapshot (20020324) fails to compile here. Linux 2.4.18-rc1 Alpha The first messages are: monitor_wrap.c: In function `mm_request_receive': monitor_wrap.c:91: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 3) monitor_wrap.c:100: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 3) which have to do with fatal() calls and int not being the same as ssize_t... But the next one is the

I am writing a program that retrieves and plays .opus files over the network. I am using the C# PInvoke wrapper OpusFileSharp, which calls into libopusfile and passes callbacks for read, seek, and tell. I want to enable seeking via the seek callback by not returning -1, but I find that as soon as I do libopusfile requests the last 64K of the .opus file, probably so it can calculate the

I noticed that (perhaps because ':' is invalid in a username) you can say ssh -l user:style host, where the "user:style" is sent by the client, and the server strips the ":style" part off and makes it available as part of the authentication context. It's currently unused. What are the plans for this, if any? I was experimenting with the idea of using it with SRP