Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes"
2013 Jun 15
2
running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes
Hi Jean-Marc,
On Jun 15, 2013, at 2:23 AMEDT, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
>> I'm looking at how to run Opus at 44.1K. I have flexibility in the
>> frame sizes of the unencoded audio, and packet sizes on the RF link.
>
> You should probably consider resampling. It's not that expensive and it
> would make things easy. But otherwise, see below.
Yes, considering your and
2013 Jun 15
0
running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes
> I'm looking at how to run Opus at 44.1K. I have flexibility in the
> frame sizes of the unencoded audio, and packet sizes on the RF link.
You should probably consider resampling. It's not that expensive and it
would make things easy. But otherwise, see below.
On 06/14/2013 06:23 PM, Marc Lindahl wrote:
> So, I was digging through the code, and I didn't see any attempt to
2013 Jun 15
0
running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes
Thanks for the answers Benjamin?
On Jun 14, 2013, at 8:05 PMEDT, Benjamin Schwartz wrote:
> I have flexibility in the frame sizes of the unencoded audio, and packet sizes on the RF link.
>
> This implies that you don't have a very tight latency constraint, so you can afford to run a resampler.
>
I assume the resample costs CPU cycles? the RX is battery powered, I'd just as
2013 Jun 15
2
running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes
Hi Jean-Marc,
On Jun 15, 2013, at 12:20 PMEDT, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
>
>
>> So I still wonder, if you set up a custom mode, but then had all the
>> settings the same as a normal mode, would the codec perform worse, or
>> the same?
>
> You'll have to try normal vs custom modes and choose. The only thing I'm
> telling you is don't run a 48 kHz
2013 Jun 15
0
running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes
On 06/15/2013 12:00 PM, Marc Lindahl wrote:
>> Do not do that, ever. Everything is calibrated for 48 kHz and you
>> will likely cause audible noise.
>
> How would it cause audible noise, I don't understand that part?
> After all the frequency calculations are off by 8%, that's not too
> extreme...
Well, the encoder is designed to follow the ear's response and
2015 Jul 06
1
Disable SILK/CELT only?
I saw the custom API, but nothing explicitly says "CELT-only" just
"custom sample rate and frame size".
I'll dig further now that you've pointed me in a direction.
Thanks,
-a
On 7/6/15, 6:18 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I believe what you want is called Opus custom (OPUS_CUSTOM in the
> code).
2013 Jan 16
3
Encoding ultrasonics
It's my understanding that the CELT layer of Opus has a maximum input
sample rate of 48k, and frequencies above 20k are effectively not encoded.
I've been trying to get up to speed on the specification, and studying its
operation, but as far as I can infer, there is a fixed set of 21 bands
distributed logarithmically to encode DC to 20k. If I were inclined to
encode at say, 96k, and pass
2019 Apr 14
1
Opus cmake build
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for the fixes. I did some more cmake build testing and
encountered a few issues:
The option -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=2 should be -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, as the
macro has a leading underscore. In the autotools build it defines this
if it is not already defined (m4/ax_add_fortify_source.m4).
When custom modes are not enabled, the cmake build is nevertheless
installing the include file
2007 Oct 04
3
Audio Speed Variability
I have a video conference like application that I've been working on for
a while now, and a recent change is causing some odd problems, and I was
wondering if anyone else had seen problems like this. The issue I'm
seeing is that when using the sound card for capture, the audio will
eventually get about 1-2 seconds out of synch (delayed), from the
video. However, if I use USB devices
2000 Nov 20
2
Low sample rates / bit rates
Hey guys. I think Vorbis is pretty cool, but since the current OggEnc only offers 44.1kHz, it
limits what I wanted to use it for. So I've been using Lame to get 16kHz mono Vorbis files. I'm
curious about whether Lame does Vorbis encoding the "right" way for non-44.1k stuff, or whether it
just encodes as it would for 44.1k & changes the sample rate on the output, but I'm
2001 May 29
2
One codebook for all audiofiles?
[ I'm not in the list because I didn't find a digested version; please
move the lists to sourceforge.net, and we would have the digested version.
I read the replies from the archive. ]
Hello.
Would it be possible to allow Vorbis use the same codebook for multiple
files? I could keep a 650 MB codebook on CD-R and use that for all my
audiofiles. If that is possible, how much the
2015 Jul 06
2
Disable SILK/CELT only?
Is there a configuration or compile flag that lets me disable the SILK
portion of the codec and use CELT only?
I could have sworn that there is something, but I can't seem to find it
in the mailing list archives.
The application here is that I am attempting to update from the old CELT
codec to OPUS. Unfortunately, the CELT codec was running *very* close
to the CPU (MIPS32--80MHz) limit
2013 Jun 15
0
running at 44.1K but with standard frame sizes
Marc Lindahl wrote:
> Of course, I'm setting up a bunch of tests to evaluate these, what I was asking was more along the lines of,
> If you set up the same exact, including the sample rate, do you get the same results (e.g. same code path, calculations, etc.?)
If you configure a custom mode with the standard parameters (48 kHz
sampling rate and a frame size of 120, 240, 480, or 960),
2008 Apr 24
1
partitioned_rice2 method
I have a doubt reg. RESIDUAL_CODING_METHOD_PARTITIONED_RICE2
http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html#partitioned_rice2 tells that
5 bits are used to specify the Rice parameter.
And "Escape code, meaning the partition is in unencoded binary form
using n bits per sample; n follows as a 5-bit number"
Question:
What is the use of the "escape code" if we have to specify the Rice
2007 Oct 04
2
Audio Speed Variability
John,
Thanks for the reply! You mentioned output sample rates should be 44100
or 48000, should I worry about input (Mic) Sample rates as well?
(Currently I was requesting the sample rate on both ends to be 16000
samplesPerSecond, for ease of passing into the codec) Also, do you
recommend any particular resampler that I should use, or are any of the
ones out there probably okay, or should
2001 May 09
4
Can compressed music sound better than uncompressed?
I quote from "Principles of Digital Audio" by Ken C. Pohlmann:
"Because perceptual coders tailor the coded signal to the ear's acuity, they
similarly tailor the required response of the playback system itself. Live
music does not pass through amplifiers and loudspeakers, it goes directly to
the ear. But recorded music must pass through the playback signal chain. Much
of the
2014 Dec 02
2
Comparing FLAC header before syncing
Hi all, I'd like to modify rsync to add a flag to compare the MD5 signature
of the unencoded audio data in the header of a FLAC file to determine
whether or not to transfer a file.
The reason being that I've got a large number of FLAC files, many of which
are corrupted in the destination volume, but many of which are valid but
the tags have been modified. The sizes of both the source and
2001 Oct 12
2
FLOOR_fromdB_LOOKUP
Hello,
You know, I always worry about the precision
and the float constants... and there is a large
lookup table in the floor1.c ... and I figure out
a way to keep the code size and speed, but
to improve the precision at this lookup table.
(the difference is small, but audible)
Here is the modifications in the floor1.c:
tatic unsigned long FLOOR_fromdB_LOOKUP[256]={
2001 Sep 05
2
Understanding of Vorbis coder
Hi
I have gone through the document available in the net regarding the
Vorbis encoder /Decoder.
Based on that i have prepared a understanding document on the
encoder/decoder block. I would like to
know whether my understanding of the coder is OK. If there are any
other additional block /information pl. provide me
with the same.
Thanks and regards
S.Padmashri
<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
2012 Nov 28
2
Opus for ASR - update and questions
For the last couple months, Nuance has performed extensive testing on how the Opus codec performs in the speech recognition task. I'm hoping to publish a full report in the coming months, but until then all I have is a teaser. Opus performed within about 1% of the WER (Word Error Rate) of unencoded audio. This is compared to about 5% for Speex, which was the previous codec of choice. Well