similar to: Conformance testing of libopus in encoding mode

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics

Optimize opus encode (float only) usecase using ARM NE10 library. Mainly effects opus_fft and ctl_mdct_forward and related functions. This optimization can be used for ARM CPUs that have NEON VFP unit. This patch only enables optimizations for ARMv7. Official ARM NE10 library page available at http://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/ To enable this optimization, use --enable-intrinsics

Hi Any help is appreciate! These days I studied ogg vorbis encoder with sample rate 44.1kbsp,and I thought the whole chart was as follows: 1. read the PCM data and store them in a buffer 2. do MDCT on those PCM data 3. do FFT on those PCM data 4. use both the FFT and MDCT coefficient to the psychoacustic modle and derive an maximum allowable noise curve, and during this curse ,do the

On 10/26/2013 01:11 PM, Wang, Chris wrote: > A simpler question. How does opus_encode() generate packets of 20ms > (SILK-only or Hybrid)? Concatenating two 10ms frames or doing it > straight with just one 20ms frame? Just one 20 ms frame. It always returns a single frame except when it just can't (e.g. 60 ms CELT). > From your explanations below, opus_encode() will concatenate

The libopus encoder's opus_encode() method is documented as "Encodes an Opus frame". Does that mean that it always produces a single Opus frame (i.e. the number of frames in the TOC byte will always be 0)? It's not clear from the documentation, but the fact that it cannot produce a 120ms Opus packet makes me wonder if that was the intention and any multi-frame Opus packets must

Thanks Jean-Marc and Benjamin for the answers. One follow-up question. If I use a repacketizer as Jean-Marc suggested by combining two 60ms frames to form a 120ms frame, without extracting individual frames and using a new TOC, I would need to have a "de-packetizer" that does the exact opposite of repacketizer. De-packetizer would need to separate this 120ms frame into two 60ms frames

Uses NEON optimized fixed point fft routines in NE10 library Signed-off-by: Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan at vidyo.com> --- Makefile.am | 12 +- celt/arm/arm_celt_map.c | 46 ++-- celt/arm/celt_ne10_fft.c | 98 +++++---- celt/arm/fft_arm.h |

I've made block diagram of the encoder because I tried to find out, how it works http://stoffke.freeshell.65535.net/ogg/block.html Although there are specifiation docs, that give very detailed information about single aspects of the encoding (or decoding) , I'm missing documenations that give a more general overview, about how the encoder works. (Vorbis Illuminated seems a bit outdated,

Hello Timothy, Just FYI, Phil at ARM is still looking into why mdct is failing.. will keep you posted. In the mean time, do you want me to disable NE10 for mdct_forward and re-submit the patchset so we may make progress? Regards, Vish On 30 April 2015 at 09:33, Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 29 April 2015 at 17:22, Timothy B. Terriberry

Hi, Can you apply this change to the MDCT test and run it again. See if more (all) sizes pass. Given the results, I strongly suspect an overflow. Jean-Marc On 08/05/15 01:21 PM, Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > Below are the results that show test_unit_dft passes, but > test_unit_mdct fails (only for nfft=480, 960, 1920) > Note: Tested on

I write a work over Vorbis. ? ?Now I have a few questions to the function. ? ?For what is the MDCT used? ? ?For what is the FFT used? ? ?How is the expiration with the encodieren? ?In the reference to the MDCT,FFT and the hearing model . ? ?Is there a volume fragmentation in Subband as MP3? ? ?If it is possible, the answers in the detail ?Thanks ? -------------- next

I've made a block diagram of the encoder because I tried to find out, how it works http://stoffke.freeshell.65535.net/ogg/block.html Although there are specifiation docs, that give very detailed information about single aspects of the encoding (or decoding) , I'm missing documenations that give a more general overview, about how the encoder works. (Vorbis Illuminated seems a bit

Hi, I'm working on porting libopus and I'd like to get information how to test Opus Encoder properly. There is information in RFC6716, that Opus Decoder's test files (http://opus-codec.org/testvectors/opus_testvectors.tar.gz) were created specifically to exercise all aspects of the decoder. Using these files, a custom implementation of libopus can be verified to be sure the Opus

Hello Jean-Marc, Yep, that was it.. with your patch, test_unit_mdct passes for all nfft. So, what you do you suggest the next step here is? Regards, Vish On 8 May 2015 at 12:30, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > Can you apply this change to the MDCT test and run it again. See if more > (all) sizes pass. Given the results, I strongly suspect an

Hello opus-dev, Can we please have review on RFCv2? We have quite a few optimizations (Eg: ifft/mdct_backwards, fixed point fft/ifft mdct_forward/backward etc) that are in my pipeline that depend on this patch series being accepted. Regards, Vish On 4 February 2015 at 12:21, Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote: > Changes from RFC PATCH v1: > - passing

Hello Jean-Marc, **Resending.. not sure why subject got removed earlier** Below are the results that show test_unit_dft passes, but test_unit_mdct fails (only for nfft=480, 960, 1920) Note: Tested on BeagleboneBlack(Cortex-A8) fixed point on branch [1] ./test_unit_dft nfft=32 inverse=0,snr = 88.394372 nfft=32 inverse=1,snr = 93.896470 nfft=128 inverse=0,snr = 89.185895 nfft=128 inverse=1,snr =

On 29 April 2015 at 17:22, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > > Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: >> >> This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1]. >> In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly >> integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus. >> You can view my opus wip code at [2]. >

Thanks for the answer. I'll take a look at this tool and verify my implementation. But I'd like to clarify the moment. If the following is applied for a test vector Reference Float Point Encoder --> Reference Float Point Decoder --> Float Point Output Reference Fixed Point Encoder --> Reference Float Point Decoder --> Fixed Point Output And then, if Float Point Output and