similar to: Stack Overflow

Did you try replacing the create() with separate malloc() and init() steps. If so, which of the two was causing the problems? BTW, you need a C99 compiler for VAR_ARRAYS to work, although you may be able to use USE_ALLOCA. Jean-Marc On 05/27/2013 08:36 AM, Fezin E T wrote: > Guys, > > Program stack is getting overflowed when I create and destroy encoder > instance continuously for

Dear All, I am trying to see smbclient resolves workgroup available. I find that it only resolves, if I put guest account as root, user. Otherwise for other user I created for samba, it returns with error ....as below added interface ip=10.8.1.102 bcast=10.8.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: session setup failed: Call

Hi, I am using samba-2.2.8a.tar.gz source and complied for regular linux. Now I am trying to cross compile it, but do not have any guidelines on how to do it? Anyone can help me on, making cross compilation work for arm-linux host. Any help is appreciated. Regards Pritesh "As a well spent day brings happy sleep, so life well used brings happy death." - Leonardo da Vinci TATA

Jean-Marc, Thanks for the response and the helpful info. I am trying to get the library to build without using the pseudostack define, and use either VAR_ARRAYS or ALLOC, but it seems the global stack is not defined. Where do can I define this in my example? VR -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 5:40 PM To:

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > That's quite strange. The only thing I can say is that the bug is most > likely *not* around line 414. It's probably some sort of memory > corruption somewhere else (quite possibly outside of Speex). Do you have > any more information? What CPU? What's the value of best_ntarget[j]? Is > SSE enabled? What's the allocation method

?? hi ?Jean-Marc, ? thanks for your answer. But still I am struggling to find a reasonable upper limit for the RAM sizes. ? You say we need 4.5/9.0 kB for enc/dec per channel. But are those sizes really independent of any settings, like frame_size, bitrate, complexity, etc. ? ? at least in our configuration I find these requirements:? ?- native stack: < 2.1kB (enc or dec) measured by RealView

On 02/20/2018 06:48 PM, Rodriguez, Vince wrote: > I am trying to get the library to build without using the pseudostack > define, and use either VAR_ARRAYS or ALLOC, but it seems the global > stack is not defined. Not sure what you mean here. If your compiler supports C99 VLAs, then by all means just define VAR_ARRAYS and you're good to go. If not, the second best option is alloca(),

? There seems to be a memory violation when calling celt_mode_create(48000, 240). ? The function compute_pulse_cache() calls celt_alloc (the second one, bits=celt_alloc()) in order to allocate 343 byte, but it is using about 872 bytes at that location, which will be deleted by the following allocations. ? In this case the following encoder call crashes at first run. ? Sorry, my time is very

Hi, I'm planning to use Opus codec on a ARM cortex M7 device running at 400MHz. Con you please suggest the best configuration directives that I have to set in the config.h file in order to obtain the best perfromances on the cortex M7 architecture? Actually I have compiled libopus 1.2.1 with the following cnfiguration parameters: #define VAR_ARRAYS  1 #define FIXED_POINT  1 #define

I'm glad to hear that my data size can be shrunk considerably, however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure? Thanks! encode: stack winBuf excBuf swBuf lagWindow old_lsp old_qlsp mem_sp mem_sw mem_sw_whole mem_exc mem_exc2 pi_gain pitch

>> There is a bit of work remaining to get the memory usage down for a >> multichannel application. There have been some good posts over the >> last couple of months about reducing memory usage. > > I think 1.1.8 incorporates all memory reductions proposed. Let me know > otherwise. For the persistent storage, the only change that I have made is to MAX_CHARS_PER_FRAME,

Description =========== This patch adds support of CMake meta build system, so you can generate Unix makefiles, VS 6.0-2017 projects and many more. Features ======== * Win32 and Linux tested * Travis CI test added * Generates working Visual Studio 6.0-2017 solutions * Generates working Unix Makefile * Supported options (<option> - <default value>): * `ENABLE_FLOATING_POINT` - on

Hi,I have been trying some different sample rate and bitrate combinations to get a feel for how CELT behaves,too, like Andrew Lentvorski. But I want to use VBR option.I want to ask a question about VBR in CELT codec.Can we use VBR option in CELT ??? "byte_per_packet" variable in code means constant bit rate, does not it ?In this code : bytes_per_packet is constant.len =

All, please let me know is there any new version of theora encoder after 1.0beta2. Regards, Nallam. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or

Hi, I'm trying to get speex working on an ARM board (ARM926EJ-Sid(wb) core, ARM 5TE architecture) and getting segfaults if build with "--enable-fixed-point --enable-arm5e-asm" options. If I use just "--enable-fixed-point", then it runs fine, but once I add "--enable-arm5e-asm" it start crashing (I use testenc to test it). Further investigation showed, that it

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: maleout12may.wav Type: audio/wav Size: 95884 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050524/57112d0c/maleout12may-0001.bin

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> gcc version 3.4.5 (mingw special) > > Can you try 4.0 or 4.1 just to be sure? mingw (native gcc for win32) doesn't officially support using gcc 4.0 and 4.1 yet (apparantly there have been some issues), so there are no binary packages. But if you think it helps, I can compile gcc 4.1 and give it a shot. >> Compile flags: >> DEFINES +=

Thanks Jean-Marc, I was able to get both encode and decode working the CC3220 device! But for bi-directional communication, I need decode and encode to occur in less time than the frame size I’m sending (20 ms). Currently decode takes 16~22 ms and encode is ~13 ms. What is the best way to try to reduce this time? Also, unsure why encode is taking less time than decode... I've also

Ok, I got a strange case.. I got a bugreport from a user about my application crashing on him. After a bit of trouble, I got him to report back the module and offset it crashed at (win32). I always retain a copy of my symbol files for my release builds, so tracking down the crash address leads to: (gdb) list *0x6d5c2213 0x6d5c2213 is in split_cb_search_shape_sign (cb_search.c:414). 409

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:56 AM > To: St?phane Lesage > Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin port on Visual DSP, Michael Shatz ? Salut Jean-Marc, After 1 month busy on other projects, I can finally answer you: > Some things to check. Do you