similar to: Xapian 1.4.12 released

Hello, gcc-ar/gcc-nm/gcc-ranlib compared to ar/nm/ranlib provide an implicit --plugin argument, so that the former can work with LTO objects, even when the gcc-lto plugin is not in ${libdir}/bfd-plugins. Do llvm-ar, llvm-ranlib and llvm-nm also imply a --plugin argument, compared to ar/ranlib/nm concerning LTO? Also https://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html does not say anything about

Xapian 1.4.13 can now be downloaded from: https://xapian.org/download This release is mainly composed of optimisations, bug fixes, and test harness improvements. The wiki has the usual summary of the most notable changes: https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/ReleaseOverview/1.4.13 A big thanks to Germán M. Bravo, Tanmay Sachan, and Amitai Schleier for helping to make this release a reality. If

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3. The Asterisk-addons release contains just a few fixes for the modules in that package, but the Asterisk release contains a large number of bug fixes for all parts of Asterisk. There are many areas that have been significantly improved by various fixes. Those include the IAX2 channel driver,

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3. The Asterisk-addons release contains just a few fixes for the modules in that package, but the Asterisk release contains a large number of bug fixes for all parts of Asterisk. There are many areas that have been significantly improved by various fixes. Those include the IAX2 channel driver,

Hello list, For a customer I need to detect blue alarms on his T1 trunks. His server is in running asterisk and zaptel 1.4. I have a tool to generate all sorts of alarms, but on generating blue alarm, zaptel recognizes them as red alarms. This is not good for us as we need to get blue alarm as blue alarm. I checked using: cat /proc/zaptel/* zttool Are these versions of asterisk and zaptel

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732 Summary: Iptables 1.4.11 or 1.4.12 does not compile on CentOS 5.6 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

Several days ago an announcement came out for a SIP bug in versions below 1.4.12. So far I don't see 1.4.12 available for download and I'm seeing something that may be the bug... My asterisk is restarting itself about every 30 minutes. HELP!!! :)

Hello all, I have successfully complied and installed 1.4.11 and recently noticed that 1.4.12 (and subsequently 1.4.12.1). Unfortunately, while 1.4.11 was running fine, 1.4.12.1 seems to build fine, but after a few minutes, I receive the following message a few times: ERROR[17670]: astobj2.c:114 INTERNAL_OBJ: bad magic number 0x11 for 0x6174c0 If I try to make a call, I get:

Hi, Is libpri rpm version 1.4.12 for CentOS 5.6 made available ? [root@ ~]# rpm -qa | grep libpri libpri-1.4.11.5-1_centos5 [root@ ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.6 (Final) [root@ ~]# [root@ ~]# yum list updates | grep libpri [root@ ~]# Please suggest/guide further. Regards, Kaushal

Hi All, I read rumors of a potential Asterisk 1.4.12 release for last week. I would like to start testing Asterisk 1.4 on Solaris, but, the fix for the segfault in res_features is only in the current development trunk. I would much rather test a release version, and as such, need to wait for the release of 1.4.12, my question is, do we have a guestimate on when it will be released, 1 week, 2