similar to: Xapian Benchmark results

mple (see attachment). > > Attachments get stripped out by the mailing list, so I?ve made a private gist of the two files here: <https://gist.github.com/jaylett/ce8455b37e2b84422346>. > > Actually, when I run it I get 0 matches, which would explain why you?re just getting the start of the document. However if I adjust things (match the stemming strategy for TermGenerator to

Hi, I want an efficient way to implement function pow in LLVM instead of invoking pow() math built-in. For algorithm part, I am clear for the logic. But I am not quite sure for which parts of LLVM should I replace built-in pow with another efficient pow implementation. Any comments and feedback are appreciated. Thanks! -- Wei Ding -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Thank you for useful feedbacks! Here is the updated version. Could you put this on top of your patches, Rusty? Thanks, H.Seto If stop_machine() invoked while one of onlined cpu is locked up by some reason, stop_machine cannot finish its work because the locked cpu cannot stop. This means all other healthy cpus will be blocked infinitely by one dead cpu. This patch allows stop_machine to

Thank you for useful feedbacks! Here is the updated version. Could you put this on top of your patches, Rusty? Thanks, H.Seto If stop_machine() invoked while one of onlined cpu is locked up by some reason, stop_machine cannot finish its work because the locked cpu cannot stop. This means all other healthy cpus will be blocked infinitely by one dead cpu. This patch allows stop_machine to

If stop_machine() invoked while one of onlined cpu is locked up by some reason, stop_machine cannot finish its work because the locked cpu cannot stop. This means all other healthy cpus will be blocked infinitely by one dead cpu. This patch allows stop_machine to return -EBUSY with some printk messages if any of stop_machine's threads cannot start running on its target cpu in time. You can

If stop_machine() invoked while one of onlined cpu is locked up by some reason, stop_machine cannot finish its work because the locked cpu cannot stop. This means all other healthy cpus will be blocked infinitely by one dead cpu. This patch allows stop_machine to return -EBUSY with some printk messages if any of stop_machine's threads cannot start running on its target cpu in time. You can

Jon Harrop wrote: > Having implemented a GC for HLVM, I am now turning my attention to > implementing a GC that supports parallelism. To do this, I would like to use > atomic instructions as well as mutexes. What is the status of LLVM's atomic > instrinsics (e.g. CAS)? Is anyone using them in real projects? > > I realised that an obvious test would be to compile some

Having implemented a GC for HLVM, I am now turning my attention to implementing a GC that supports parallelism. To do this, I would like to use atomic instructions as well as mutexes. What is the status of LLVM's atomic instrinsics (e.g. CAS)? Is anyone using them in real projects? I realised that an obvious test would be to compile some simple example programs with llvm-g++ instead of

Check for the return value of ''open_ctree()'' before dereferencing it. Signed-off-by: Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@in.ibm.com> --- btrfs-image.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c index f2bbcc8..2a33a55 100644 --- a/btrfs-image.c +++ b/btrfs-image.c @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int create_metadump(const char *input, FILE *out,

Hi, I am new to LLVM. I am trying to read a plain text file in a llvm pass. But getting an error - llvm[0]: Linking Release Loadable Module LLVMHello.so /usr/bin/ld: /home/abhirup/llvm/llvm2.8_Install/llvm-2.8/lib/Transforms/Hello/Release/Hello.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `(anonymous namespace)::Hello::update_sec_read(char const*)' can not be used when making a

It provides an initial implementation, LinuxPlatform, which is by default included in the build. Later code will refactor the build process to include the appropriate implementation depending on the target platform. Signed-off-by: Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> --- src/Makefile.am | 4 ++ src/linux_platform.cpp | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hi Nick: The first problem have been solved by calling llvm-ld: $ llvm-ld -o hellosin.llvm hellosin.bc -lm $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/usr/lib/libm.so hellosin.llvm.bc hello sin: 0.50 The pthread problem remains after llvm-ld: $ lli -force-interpreter=true -load=/lib/libpthread.so.0 phello.llvm.bc 0 lli 0x08796bf8 Segmentation fault For those who are getting "invalid

Hi Nick: Thanks for pointing me to libffi. Recompile LLVM with libffi does solve the problem of printf. But it still has other problems: 1) sinf() returns 0 in the interpreter, but returns correct value in JIT (see hellosin.c) 2) calling pthread_create cause lli to crash in the interpreter mode, but no problem in JIT (see phello.c). My questions are: i) can I call any arbitrary external function

I have some code generated with llvm-g++ and llvm-link that includes a tail call that is confusing me for two reasons: 1) I am not sure why it is a tail call (i.e. it does not look like it is in the tail position) 2) When I instrument the code using my opt pass, none of the instrumentation functions in the callee get called, leading me to believe that some funny business is going on. Below I

Hi All, With the help of Chuck Tuffli, I'm now able to use CTL to export a zvol over FC to a Linux host: LUN Backend Size (Blocks) BS Serial Number Device ID 0 block 4185915392 512 FBSDZFS001 ORA_ASM_01 lun_type=0 num_threads=14 file=/dev/zvol/tank/oracle_asm_01 1 block 4185915392 512 FBSDZFS002 ORA_ASM_02

You can add symbols from Archieve via StaticLibrarySearchGenerator. But it is added recently though On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 21:02, Praveen Velliengiri < praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Geoff, > I tried it, but I can't able to reproduce it. > > Test Program: > #include <fstream> > int main() > { > std::ifstream stream1, stream2; >

Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Tian, Xinmin <xinmin.tian at intel.com> wrote: > > Remember that, the prepare-phase is invoked in the FE or right after FE, inlining is not happening, that is why we don't call it "pass". Chandler made a good point for this case a long time back. > What I was describing is the inlining in the optimizer

VS2013 support is dropped in about 1 week from now :) On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:37 PM Mueller-Roemer, Johannes Sebastian < Johannes.Sebastian.Mueller-Roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Visual Studio up to and including VS2013 implements > std::chrono::high_resolution_clock in an absolutely unusable manner (it is > a very low resolution clock…) [1]. Also, division is implemented

>>>>Ok, but this looks like a “workaround" for your specific use-case, I don’t see how it can scale as a model-agnostic and general-purpose region semantic. I would say it is a design trade-off. Regardless it is a new instruction or an intrinsics with token/tag, it will consist of model-agnostic part and model-non-agnostic part. The package comes with a framework for parsing

On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Scott Ricketts wrote: > I have some code generated with llvm-g++ and llvm-link that includes a tail call that is confusing me for two reasons: > > 1) I am not sure why it is a tail call (i.e. it does not look like it is in the tail position) The "tail" marker has a very specific description in LLVM IR: it says that the caller does not access the