Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Xapian ported to WebAssembly for use in web browser"
2019 May 08
2
Where to send emails with questions about WebAssembly?
Okay, so where should I send questions for WebAssembly? Is it this mailing list or a different one? I want to ask about how to compile WebAssembly modules with Clang directly, without Emscripten, for situations like what I have currently where I have a problem with generating WebAssembly and/or JavaScript glue code (I have a problem with the gen_struct_info stuff; I asked on the Emscripten
2019 Feb 20
2
Compile R to WebAssembly / Emscripten?
Has anyone attempted to compile R (probably without any OS bindings) to
WebAssembly / Emscripten? If so, how far did you get? (would be crazy
awesome if you could get all the way to a ggplot bitmap output). If not, is
this a waste of time or is there some daylight to doing this?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2019 Feb 20
0
Compile R to WebAssembly / Emscripten?
This was some time ago:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2013-May/066724.html
So probably not hopeless, but I would think it is a lot of work.
Gabor
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:17 AM Todd Wilder <wildert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone attempted to compile R (probably without any OS bindings) to
> WebAssembly / Emscripten? If so, how far did you get? (would be crazy
>
2019 Feb 26
1
Compile R to WebAssembly / Emscripten?
As I recall, the major blocker is that R links against a number of other
things (notably BLAS, pcre, etc) so while technically possible (?) I
suppose, the universe of things you'd have to compile over and then get
working is much larger than just the R internals.
I think most people who consider this (including me years ago, as well as
the poster of Gabor's message to rdevel) hit that
2015 Jun 18
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] WebAssembly Backend
>
> This seems interesting, I have a few questions:
>
>
> Has the ISA been finalized yet or is it still a work in progress? Will
> there be a fixed number of registers?
>
The design document has a high-level idea of the ISA, or rather of the AST
we're thinking of going with:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/AstSemantics.md
The final encoding isn't
2017 Jun 30
3
[LLD] Adding WebAssembly support to lld
Hi llvmers,
As you may know, work has been progressing on the experimental
WebAssembly backend in llvm. However, there is currently not a good
linking story. Most the of existing linking strategies (i.e. those in
the emscripten toolchain) involve bitcode linking and whole program
compilation at link time.
To improve this situation I've been working on adding a wasm backend
for lld. My
2017 Jul 01
1
[LLD] Adding WebAssembly support to lld
Can you link to docs about the wasm object format? (both relocatable and
executable)
Also, traditional object file linkers are primarily concerned with
concatenating binary blobs with small amount of patching of said binary
blobs based on computed virtual (memory) addresses. Or perhaps to put it
another way, what traditional object file linkers do is construct program
images meant to be mapped
2017 Jul 01
2
[LLD] Adding WebAssembly support to lld
Hi Sam,
First, I want to know the symbol resolution semantics. I can imagine that
that is set in stone yet, but just that you guys are still discussing what
would be the best semantics or file format for the linkable wasm object
file. I think by knowing more about the format and semantics, we can give
you guys valuable feedback, as we've been actively working on the linker
for a few years
1999 Apr 12
1
Problems with coda
I have successfully installed coda in R, and I am also able to read
output from a Bugs run into
coda. When I try to plots from CODA Output Analysis Menu, I do however
_get_ problems:
CODA Output Analysis Menu
*************************
1:Plots
2:Statistics
3:List/Change Options
4:Return to Main Menu
Selection: 1
Error: "missing" illegal use of missing
Quitting CODA....
Do you
2015 Jun 17
8
[LLVMdev] [RFC] WebAssembly Backend
Hello all,
WebAssembly [0] its a new virtual ISA being designed to efficiently
run compiled code in web browsers and other things, starting with
C/C++, and eventually many other languages [1]. WebAssembly
distinguishes itself from other virtual ISAs with optimizations to
reduce download size and decode time, strong portability and
predictability invariants (for example, the base has no undefined
2017 Jan 03
2
LLVM WebAssembly target
Hello.
Excuse me.
Why CMakeLists.txt from llvm-3.9.1.src does not contain WebAssembly target?
So, it is like
set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS
AArch64
AMDGPU
ARM
BPF
Hexagon
Mips
MSP430
NVPTX
PowerPC
Sparc
SystemZ
X86
XCore
)
but not like
set(LLVM_ALL_TARGETS
AArch64
AMDGPU
ARM
BPF
Hexagon
Mips
MSP430
NVPTX
PowerPC
Sparc
SystemZ
Webassembly
X86
2018 May 08
0
"opus will be very slow" message
I'm also interested in this warning as I have received it when compiling
libopus for WebAssembly using Emscripten and have an open ticket (just saw
that you responded to it, thanks for that!)
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49537429/building-compiling-opus-libopus-in-emscripten-with-optimization/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2005 Feb 15
1
Question regarding SER/Asterisk functionality
Hi all,
I'm currently looking for a VoIP platform to support the following features:
Caller ID
Call Waiting with caller ID
Call Hold/Retrieve
Three-way conference
Calling Line Identity Presentation
Call back last missed call
Last called number redial
User line locking/Call Barring (all current levels)
Itemised bill
Call Forward
Call Forward on No Reply
Call Forward on Busy
Call Forward
2019 Dec 07
1
WebAssembly Opus Decoder
Thanks Timothy. Media Source Extensions were much easier and high-level
than using WebAssembly with the Web Audio API. Unfortunately, MSE does not
support MIME "audio/ogg" and I had to put my OpusFiles into a WebM
container file. What could we do to get MSE support for Ogg Opus files? I
created this issue if it helps:
https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/245. Would be happy to
2004 Sep 20
1
compilation failed for package
Hello,
I am new to R on Linux (and to LINUX), running a 1.9.1 on a Linux MDK10.0. When updating or installing different packages, I get messages like this (under), the package doesn't install. Can anyone help me? I know this is all to little information, but I don't know were to start. I think there is something wrong in how or were the C++ or fortran compilator is installed??
Thanks, Geir
2017 Jul 06
3
[LLD] Adding WebAssembly support to lld
Dan Gohman <sunfish at mozilla.com> writes:
>> Sorry, I meant why that didn't work with ELF (or what else didn't).
>>
>
> The standard executable WebAssembly format does not use ELF, for numerous
> reasons, most visibly that ELF is designed for sparse decoding -- headers
> contain offsets to arbitrary points in the file, while WebAssembly's format
> is
2018 Nov 02
0
WebAssembly Opus Decoder
Chris McGowan wrote:
> All thoughts and contributions are welcome, and I'm planning to add a
> seeking feature using HTTP range requests:
> https://github.com/AnthumChris/opus-stream-decoder/issues/1
You may also be interested in <https://github.com/brion/ogv.js/> (if
you're not already aware of it). There might be some useful
collaboration possible.
> ~140-220K Wasm
2018 Nov 02
3
WebAssembly Opus Decoder
If anyone is integrating Opus audio into a web or JavaScript application, I
wrote a WebAssembly Opus decoder that uses libopusfile to decode Opus files
in chunks using the JavaScript Streams API. This decoder can begin
decoding after receiving the Opus headers and first audio data page:
https://github.com/AnthumChris/opus-stream-decoder
All thoughts and contributions are welcome, and I'm
2017 Jul 12
2
[LLD] Adding WebAssembly support to lld
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Sorry for the belated response. I was on vacation last week. A couple of
> thoughts on this patch and the story of webassembly linking.
And I'm about to be on (mostly) vacation for next 3 weeks :)
>
> - This patch adds a wasm support as yet another major architecture besides
>
2007 Sep 20
2
Feedback on XML metadata namespace
On 19/09/2007, Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen+xiphlists@runbox.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19. September 2007 19:02:06 Ian Malone wrote:
> > Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > > Attached is a much improved version of yesterday's draft. Introducing
> > > the audio:collection:artwork element to deal with album cover graphics
> > > and such.
> >