similar to: Xapian 1.4.4 released

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Xapian 1.4.4 released"

2009 Apr 09
0
Processed: Update submitter address for my bugs
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # bugs from schepler at math.unipd.it > submitter 390095 ! Bug#390095: klash: No control keys working Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Schepler <schepler at math.unipd.it> to Daniel Schepler <dschepler at gmail.com>. > submitter 419472 ! Bug#419472: aegis: FTBFS under pbuilder even building as non-root Changed Bug
2016 Dec 06
0
Spam messages
Hi, This topic has come up previously, across the R e-mail lists and the spammers need not be subscribers (but could be), but simply reasonably competent HTML scrapers. If you look at the online archives of the R lists, for example R-Devel for this month: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/thread.html <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/thread.html>
2017 Mar 25
0
non-infectious license for R package?
On 25.03.2017 14:29, Mario Emmenlauer wrote: > > Dear All, > > thanks a lot for all the quick and helpful responses! I'm currently > interested in the "stance" of this community towards closed source > contributions. The way I understand it, currently my options are quite > limited: I would most likely need to use a remote procedure call API, > and build one
2016 Dec 06
1
Spam messages
I agree that no action should be taken. It's somewhat mystifying that the robot known as "Amy Kristen" responds so quickly after my post, and with such regularity (so far twice per hour), using perhaps several email addresses - and using the correct "Reply-To" headers. But more mystifying is that she keeps the same name the whole time. And lucky, I guess, because otherwise
2017 Mar 25
2
non-infectious license for R package?
Dear All, thanks a lot for all the quick and helpful responses! I'm currently interested in the "stance" of this community towards closed source contributions. The way I understand it, currently my options are quite limited: I would most likely need to use a remote procedure call API, and build one side of the API as GPL. But this would make the coupling much slower and more
2014 Aug 27
1
working with huge memory: single precision?
Hello, I'm very new to R and don't know much about it yet. I would like to develop R-programs that work with data of sizes of 10^10 - 10^11 data points. We have very-high-memory machines with ~256 GB, but it would significantly help if I could store the data points in single precision in RAM instead of double precision. Is that possible? In the documentation I found a sentence saying its
2003 Apr 06
0
Re: Bug#187537: r-base: FTBFS: hangs in tcltk test (PR#2733)
Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> writes: > Thanks for the bug report. I will pass it on to R Core. > > > In case this makes any difference, I am redirecting the stdout and > > stderr of pbuilder into a pipe, while leaving stdin unchanged. > > Don't know, it may. But that does not propagate to what happens inside > pbuilder, i.e. in the processes started by
2016 Dec 06
2
Spam messages
The problem is not specific to this list. Any kind of public list may mean that other subscribers (or even the whole world) can see your email address. So whenever you mail to a (public) list there is a good chance that afterwards, you will get more spam. Not really much can be done about it, at least not on the side of the list, since any of the subscribers may be a spammer, who can know... All
2017 Mar 24
0
non-infectious license for R package?
See inline... > On Mar 24, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Mario Emmenlauer <mario at emmenlauer.de> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > I've been following this mailing list for over three years now, but > its just now that I have realized that R is licensed under GPL! :-) > > I'm not a lawyer and I don't want lawyer advice, but I'd like to get > your feedback on
2017 Mar 24
0
non-infectious license for R package?
There are also packages like highcharter, which package proprietary software without a license, but it is incumbent on the user to respect the license of the underlying library. -----Original Message----- From: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Joris Meys Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 8:14 AM To: Marc Schwartz Cc: R-Devel Subject: Re: [Rd] non-infectious license for R
2008 Aug 02
2
Bug#493393: xen-3: FTBFS: Permission problem
Package: xen-3 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean if [ -f debian/control ] && [ -f debian/control.md5sum ] && [ -f debian/rules.gen ]; then \ if md5sum debian/changelog
2007 Jun 28
1
Bug#430967: xen-3.0: FTBFS with gcc-4.2 [i386]: C99 inline functions are not supported
Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.4-1-1 Severity: important From my pbuilder build log, using a chroot with packages mostly from sid except that gcc-defaults is from experimental: ... gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -DNDEBUG -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix include
2017 Mar 24
2
non-infectious license for R package?
The key difference being that while not under the GPL, highcharter is still open source. There isn't a single compiled library in the entire package. WinBUGS otoh is closed source (although there is an open source version of it, OpenBUGS). As far as I understood, CRAN doesn't accept packages containing any binary executable code without the proper source files attached. So including the
2017 Mar 17
2
xapian core missing link to math on MSYS2
Dear Olly, thanks a lot for the pointer! I've fetched the patch you mention but actually it seems this is already included in the 1.4.3 release, is that possible? Also it did not solve the problem, I still get references to exp10. I've checked with nm and omenquire.o has undefined references to log10 and exp10. I went further and replaced exp10 in omenquire.cc with __builtin_exp10, but
2017 Mar 24
2
non-infectious license for R package?
My humble 2 nonlegal cents: There are multiple packages that make the link between R and proprietary software. One example is R2WinBUGS which connects to WinBUGS, but there are a lot more of these. All of these use essentially the same idea: - create the package under a standard GPL license - use the (command line) interface provided by the proprietary software to connect with it, eg by calls to
2006 Sep 18
1
Cannot read from the source file or disk
Hi everybody, I'm very glad to meet you. Congratulations to Samba staff, for them open source software is well known as high quality product. I've got a problem now, since I changed of server. First of all, my old server HP ML330 G3 suffered a little problem, and was replaced by an HP ML150 G2. The older server had RedHat 9 installed with Samba 3.22. This server runs Fedora Core 5 and
2010 Jul 19
2
Bug#589661: xen: FTBFS: RuntimeError: Can't find /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.32-5, please install the linux-support-2.6.32-5 package
Source: xen Version: 4.0.1~rc3-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean if [ -f debian/control ] && [ -f debian/control.md5sum ] && [ -f debian/rules.gen ]; then \ if md5sum debian/changelog debian/bin/gencontrol.py debian/templates/control.hypervisor.in debian/templates/control.main.in debian/templates/control.source.in
2017 Mar 15
2
xapian core missing link to math on MSYS2
Dear All, I've tried to build xapian-core 1.4.3 on MSYS2. It fails with attached error (undefined reference to `exp10'). I think it might be missing an explicit link to 'm'. I'm not able to fix this myself as I do not know autotools sufficiently well, but I hope you might be able to help. Cheers, Mario Emmenlauer -- BioDataAnalysis GmbH, Mario Emmenlauer Tel.
2018 Jan 25
0
Why R should never move to git
Hi Duncan! I think there are many users whose first experiences with git where frustrating, and trust me, many people here can relate to your pain. I can certainly say that I can. At first, git makes significant effort to become fluent in seemingly "simple" tasks. I can literally feel your pain right now. But this is the main downside of git: that it can be hard to learn. I overcame
2003 Apr 04
0
Re: Bug#187537: r-base: FTBFS: hangs in tcltk test (PR#2730)
Thanks for the bug report. I will pass it on to R Core. On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:01:23PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Package: r-base > Version: 1.6.2.cvs.20030403-1 > Severity: serious > > Whenever I try to build r-base using pbuilder, it gets stuck at the > following point: > > ... > collecting examples for package 'tcltk' ... > make[6]: Entering