similar to: Normalization in Letor

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Normalization in Letor"

2014 Mar 09
2
[GSOC 2014] Some questions about Letor module
Hi, I've read the code of letor module. And I have some questions about it: 1. In https://github.com/rishabhmehrotra/xapian/blob/master/xapian-letor/letor_internal.cc#L299, there is a write_to_file method, which save RankList into ?train.txt?. But the format for ?train.txt? is different from the one mentioned in http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/GSoC2011/LTR/Notes#QueryLevelNorm. And in
2014 Mar 09
2
[GSOC 2014] Some questions about Letor module
Thanks for your reply! For the third question: In https://inex.mmci.uni-saarland.de/data/documentcollection.jsp, I can find inex2010-article.qrels in 2010 assessment, but can?t find query files. Could you send me the link? I have registered on INEX website. And I also need to download ``INEX 2009 collection without annotation tags: (unofficial)`` on
2016 May 14
2
GSoC 2016 Letor dataset discussion
Hello, I wanted to decide the dataset that should be used for Letor stabilisation project. I think 2009 INEX Wikipedia Collection <http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-information-systems/software/inex/> should work fine. It's a collection of 2,666,190 XML articles, 115 topics <http://inex.mmci.uni-saarland.de/protected/adhoc/2009-topics.zip>, 50,275 qrel
2016 Mar 08
2
Error while building from git - xapian-letor
Hi all, While building from git with xapian-letor not ignored in bootstrap, I am getting the following make error: In function `main': /home/ayush/Desktop/xapian/xapian-letor/bin/xapian-letor-update.cc:98: undefined reference to `Xapian::Internal::str(unsigned int)' /home/ayush/Desktop/xapian/xapian-letor/bin/xapian-letor-update.cc:99: undefined reference to
2017 Mar 26
2
Draft Proposal
Hi, I have submitted a draft proposal on the GSoC website but I also wanted to share my draft proposal through Dropbox to get your feedback quickly through it. Please review it and let me know your feedbacks as soon as possible. I haven't written much about automated testing as I haven't written any test yet ( I will learn writing automated tests before April end ). Link to my
2016 Mar 20
2
GSoC 2016 Letor Stabilisation
Hello, I'm Ayush from New Delhi, India. I am interested in Letor Stabilisation project for GSoC. I have a good background in machine learning. Sorry for getting in so late, university exams were holding me back. I'll try to cover as much as I can in the coming week. I am following the plan of attack suggested on the project page. Following are the things that I have completed: 1.
2016 Apr 02
2
xapian-letor refactoring and adding tests
Hello, I applied to letor stabilisation project for gsoc. I'd like to use coming weeks to improve the workability of xapian-letor. For that, I'm planning to refactor code in current master and begin writing some tests for it. Before adding tests, I think it would be better if xapian-letor could be made consistent with how xapian-core is written. For that, I'd first like to
2016 Jul 30
2
Letor: returning MSet after re-ranking
> > > I'd prefer to avoid adding things to the public API that don't get > used by end users. However because LTR is outside the Xapian build > tree, we can't easily give it privileged access to Xapian internals. > Sorry for a delayed response. The way I was thinking of performing reranking with updated weights was to add a class MSetRanker (basically containing a
2016 Jun 06
2
Letor stabilisation - project progress
Hello everyone, I have completed introducing some code from v-hasu's branch into mine, mainly for Features, FeatureVector and FeatureManager classes. I have pushed the changes to https://github.com/ayshtmr/xapian/tree/letor-update. I am now proceeding to write unit tests for feature modules. There are a few things that I wanted to clarify: 1. I have introduced a lot of code in a single
2014 May 21
2
Some questions about Letor project
Hi all, Thank you for giving me the opportunity to work with Xapian :) I am Jiarong Wei, a third year undergraduate student in Zhejiang University, China. In GSoC 2014, I will work on Letor module with Hanxiao Sun. Here are some questions I encountered these days, 1. In letor.cc, we have two parts of functions: the training part and the ranking part. I?ll use SVMRanker as an example. The
2016 Jun 27
2
xapian-letor: FeatureVector discussion
Hello James, Parth, Following our discussion on IRC and on code review, the way FeatureVector class works needs some discussion. Presently, the FeatureVector class is defined as follows, with a fixed number of feature count (19): class FeatureVector::Internal : public Xapian::Internal::intrusive_base{ friend class FeatureVector; double label; double score;
2016 Jun 29
2
xapian-letor: FeatureVector discussion
> > > > The approach I was thinking would look something like this: > > * instead of Features, which is really a namespace implemented as a > class, we separate out the calculation of the different features > into distinct subclasses of Feature, whose only job is to calculate > a single feature. Currently the FeatureManager calls these (via >
2016 Aug 08
2
Letor: Feature sub-classes question
Hello James, I am working on breaking down Features into sub-classes. Should each of the features get their own sub-class, or should the grouping be done according to type? i.e. query-document pair dependent, query-dependent and document dependent sub-classes. Using this approach makes more sense if we plan to add support for user to include query-dependent and document-dependent features in
2017 Mar 26
0
Draft Proposal
Hi, Please give your feedbacks in the Google doc -> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wrbkD3OlhrmJZnrgcNyQrISwcQdTX2uJ9WDWiuO87g4/edit?usp=sharing . Regards, Ayush Pandey. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Ayush Pandey < f2012714 at goa.bits-pilani.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > I have submitted a draft proposal on the GSoC website but I also > wanted to share my draft
2014 Mar 04
4
Questions on letor module
Hi, I have several questions regarding the letor module,I looked at the framework of learning to rank in xapian http://rishabhmehrotra.com/gsoc/17.png, I am a little confused. Why using deep learning to find unsupervised features in test data? Since in my understanding, learning to rank model usually learn features from the training data then apply the model to the test data? Why test set and
2016 Mar 13
2
Unable to generate lcov test coverage reports (Out of memory error)
Hi all, I was trying to generate lcov test coverage reports for xapian-core but got an out of memory error: $ lcov --capture --directory . --output-file xapian-core.info Capturing coverage data from . Found gcov version: 4.7.3 Scanning . for .gcda files ... Found 270 data files in . Processing bin/xapian-progsrv.gcda Out of memory! These are the steps I followed in xapian-core directory
2014 Feb 26
2
GSOC 2014
Just to add on top of what Olly has already mentioned. > > Now, I'm reading the resources provided on ideas' page. Do you have > > any other suggestions of knowing more about the letor? > > And I'd like to test the function of letor. But I can't find code > > example. Can u give me some suggestions? > > Hopefully Parth can help here. > In order
2014 Mar 11
2
[GSOC 2014] Indexing INEX dataset
Hi Parth, I?ve implemented SVMRanker class and also sorted out most of current Letor APIs. Now I?m trying to use INEX dataset to verify my implement. But I stuck in the indexing part. You said in the documentation that we have to add prefix when indexing. Also I notice that you set some metadata in omindex.cc of your version. But the omindex.cc has changed since 2011. I think that?s why my result
2014 Feb 25
2
GSOC 2014
Hi, I am Jiarong Wei (irc: VcamX). I?m a 3rd year computer science student at Zhejiang University, China. I?m very willing to contribute to Xapian as part of GSoC 2014. Now I?m at Simon Fraser University, Canada, as an exchange student. I?ll go back to China on the end of April. I think it doesn?t matter I?ll change the time zone :) From the list of project?s ideas, Learning to Rank interests me
2016 Aug 18
3
KMeans - Evaluation Results
> > > > Actually, you're doing something slightly unusual there: making the > internal member public. Protected would be better, and private is I think > most usual; library clients aren't going to have access to the Internal > class declaration, so they can't call things on it. This means it's > actually difficult right now to subclass Feature. > > I