Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "1.4.0 release date"
2016 Jul 09
0
Xapian 1.4.0 released
The issue is that delve was renamed to xapian-delve but documentation
is still saying that delve is delve. Who has access to update the
documentation?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/xapian.html
Installed Programs: copydatabase, delve, quest, simpleexpand,
simpleindex, simplesearch, xapian-check, xapian-chert-update,
xapian-compact, xapian-config, xapian-inspect,
2016 Jun 25
0
Xapian 1.4.0 released
This is really great. Thank you very much for all the work, in
particular on the single-file backend feature. We will start to release
new versions of Kiwix dealing with this in the next weeks.
Regards
Emmanuel
On 25.06.2016 20:28, Olly Betts wrote:
> I'm delighted to announce the release of 1.4.0. You can download from:
>
> http://xapian.org/download
>
> This is a major
2016 Jul 06
2
Xapian 1.4.0 released
I have installed the new Xapian 1.4.0 , during the installation, I
haven't seen any problems, however, when I execute commands quest and
delve I get different versions, and my Perl-based searches return
Exception: Couldn't detect type of database ... and what are these
glass things in the index directories? There is a no new version of
Perl Search::Xapian.
$ quest -version
quest -
2016 Jun 25
2
Xapian 1.4.0 released
I'm delighted to announce the release of 1.4.0. You can download from:
http://xapian.org/download
This is a major milestone release, but the last development release (1.3.7)
was essentially a release candidate so the changes arefairly minor - the only
notable change is the update to Unicode 9.0.0.
That means a short thank you list for this release - thanks to Andy
Chilton!
As always, if
2016 Jun 02
0
Xapian 1.3.7 development snapshot released
I'm happy to be able to announce that Xapian 1.3.7 is now available.
This development snapshot is essentially a release candidate for 1.4.0,
so please test with it and report any issues you hit.
The plan is to release 1.4.0 on or shortly after 2016-06-21 - this is
the date on which Unicode 9.0.0 is due to be officially released, so
we'll ship 1.4.0 with support for that (this is one
2002 Feb 12
0
[RHSA-2001:163-20] Updated ucd-snmp packages available
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory
Synopsis: Updated ucd-snmp packages available
Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:163-20
Issue date: 2001-12-04
Updated on: 2002-02-12
Product: Red Hat Linux
Keywords: ucd-snmp protos test suite snmp
Cross references:
Obsoletes:
2001 Nov 02
0
[RHSA-2001:101-07] New ucd-snmp package to fix several security vulnerabilities
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory
Synopsis: New ucd-snmp package to fix several security vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:101-07
Issue date: 2001-08-15
Updated on: 2001-10-31
Product: Red Hat Linux
Keywords: ucd-snmp security fix
Cross references:
2014 Dec 30
2
Help with xapian
Hi,
Can someone tell me what was Gaurav Arora's exact contribution in the
Clustering Search Results part during GSoC 2014? I guess that will be
more helpful in understanding his code.
Regards
Karthik
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:56:39PM +0530, karthik iyer wrote:
>> Could some one tell me some specific
2003 Oct 16
1
tftpd-hpa reports a wrong date
Hi, I have a weirdness with tftpd-hpa, it seems to report a wrong date
in the syslog (2 hours early):
root at sup01 > tail -f /var/log/syslog
Oct 16 11:26:52 sup01 last message repeated 11 times
Oct 16 11:28:06 sup01 ucd-snmp[425]: Connection from 62.210.191.157
Oct 16 09:28:33 sup01 in.tftpd[14495]: RRQ from 10.8.1.222 filename
update.cfg
Oct 16 11:30:01 sup01 /USR/SBIN/CRON[14521]: (root)
2001 Aug 17
0
Security Update: [CSSA-2001-031.0] Linux -security issues in ucd-snmp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
______________________________________________________________________________
Caldera International, Inc. Security Advisory
Subject: Linux - security issues in ucd-snmp
Advisory number: CSSA-2001-031.0
Issue date: 2001, August 16
Cross reference:
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Problem
2005 Aug 09
0
CESA-2005:720-01: Low CentOS 2 i386 ucd-snmp security update
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the
centos mirror:
RHSA-2005:720-01 Low: ucd-snmp security update
Files available:
ucd-snmp-4.2.5-8.AS21.5.i386.rpm
ucd-snmp-devel-4.2.5-8.AS21.5.i386.rpm
ucd-snmp-utils-4.2.5-8.AS21.5.i386.rpm
More details are available from the RedHat web site at
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html
The easy way to make sure you
2008 Jun 10
0
CESA-2008:0528-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 ucd-snmp security update
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the
centos mirror:
RHSA-2008:0528-01 Moderate: ucd-snmp security update
Files available:
ucd-snmp-4.2.5-8.AS21.7.i386.rpm
ucd-snmp-devel-4.2.5-8.AS21.7.i386.rpm
ucd-snmp-utils-4.2.5-8.AS21.7.i386.rpm
More details are available from the RedHat web site at
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html
The easy way to make sure
2002 Feb 12
0
FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:11.snmp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-02:11 Security Advisory
FreeBSD, Inc.
Topic: ucd-snmp/net-snmp remotely exploitable vulnerabilities
Category: ports
Module: net-snmp
Announced:
2008 Jun 11
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 40, Issue 5
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2004 Dec 17
0
CentOS-2 errata update 6
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the
centos mirror:
RHBA-2004:401-07 Updated util-linux and mount packages
RHBA-2004:458-04 Updated sh-utils package
RHBA-2004:459-04 Updated fileutils package
RHBA-2004:469-06 Updated piranha package
RHBA-2004:476-06 Updated rusers packages
RHBA-2004:487-04 Updated ucd-snmp packages
RHBA-2004:493-04 Updated clumanager package
2006 Apr 06
1
Fwd: RE: Not able to join domain
Sorry about the direct post....
>Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:38:39 -0500
>To: "Chris Boyd" <Chris.Boyd@usit.ie>
>From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net>
>Subject: RE: [Samba] Not able to join domain
>
>At 04/06/06 08:13, you wrote:
>>I've tried that and now I get "Access denied" instead "cannot find
>>user". Also I'm
2008 Dec 03
1
Compiling latest svn revision
Greetings,
Before I head off to bed I thought I'd fire off this email wrt
compiling the latest svn revision.
I finally resolved all the dependencies, ran bootstrap/configure, but
make eventually fails with:
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../crt1.o: In function `_start':
(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
Xapian.o: In function `boot_Search__Xapian':
2006 Feb 13
0
imap process spinning (ix86/OpenBSD 3.8, dovecot 1.0b3)
Hi Dovecot-ers,
Immediately on accessing our new dovecot 1.0b3 build, we see
processes spinning, much like the old dovecot 0.9x builds did for us.
Here is a ktrace of the spinning imap process:
topos:tmp# kdump
18248 imap EMUL "native"
18248 imap PSIG SIGALRM caught handler=0x1c03ff88 mask=0x0
18248 imap CALL setitimer(0,0xcfbcb3bc,0xcfbcb3ac)
18248 imap RET
2010 May 18
1
Getting dates in an SPSS file in right format.
Dear all,
I am trying to read an SPSS file into a data frame in R using method
read.spss(),
sample <- read.spss(file.name,to.data.frame=TRUE)
But dates in the data.frame ''sample'' are coming as integers and not in the
actual date format given in the SPSS file.
Appreciate if anyone can help me to solve this problem.
Kind Regards,
Praveen Surendran
2G, Complex
2006 Jul 18
1
Classification error rate increased by bagging - any ideas?
Hi,
I'm analysing some anthropometric data on fifty odd skull bases. We know the
gender of each skull, and we are trying to develop a predictor to identify
the
sex of unknown skulls.
Rpart with cross-validation produces two models - one of which predicts
gender
for Males well, and Females poorly, and the other does the opposite (Females
well, and Males poorly). In both cases the error