Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "execl"
2016 Feb 24
4
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:17:35 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Eric wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:33:22 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Eric J wrote:
>>>> I discovered, while trying to set up Tcl bindings for Notmuch
>>>>
2016 Feb 22
3
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:33:22 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Eric J wrote:
> > I discovered, while trying to set up Tcl bindings for Notmuch
> > (https://notmuchmail.org/), which uses Xapian, that flintlock was not
> > being locked (I had lost updates).
>
> It seems to work for me, testing with this:
>
2016 Feb 21
5
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
I discovered, while trying to set up Tcl bindings for Notmuch
(https://notmuchmail.org/), which uses Xapian, that flintlock was not
being locked (I had lost updates).
I then found that opening a Xapian database for writing directly via
the Xapian Tcl bindings also silently fails to lock flintlock.
I have taken a copy of flint_lock.cc to play with, and I find that it
locks the file when called
2016 Mar 01
0
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:39:11 +0100 (CET), Eric J <eric at deptj.eu> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:37:52 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
8>< --------
>> I'm testing with Tcl 8.6 (Debian package 8.6.4+dfsg-3), and it works for
>> me.
>>
>> So it does seem it must be due to something your Tcl interpreter is
>> doing, but I'm
2016 Feb 27
2
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:37:52 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:17PM +0100, Eric J wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:24:51 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> > > It's clearly not as simple as execl() always releasing the lock, but I
> > > don't think we've ruled out the OS entirely yet - the
2016 Feb 25
2
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:24:51 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:30:55PM +0100, Eric J wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:17:35 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
>>>On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Eric wrote:
>>>> % package require xapian 1.0.0
>>>> 1.2.18
>>>
>>>
2016 Feb 24
0
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Eric wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:33:22 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Eric J wrote:
> > > I discovered, while trying to set up Tcl bindings for Notmuch
> > > (https://notmuchmail.org/), which uses Xapian, that flintlock was not
> > > being locked (I
2015 Sep 07
0
gnu_getopt.h / errors Interix 3.5 / xapian-core-1.2.21 / Eric Lindblad
gnu_getopt.h by Eric Lindblad 07-09-2015
http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com
Subsequent to the compile of libxapian.so.22.6.8 and libxapian.a
there are executable source files using gnu_getopt.h which has
an #ifdef __CYGWIN__, perhaps that file would need attention in
order for compile to proceed on my modified SFU Interix 3.5 setup
The 1 'ambiguous overload' report on SFU Interix I
2015 Sep 07
0
test 1 / errors Interix 3.5 / xapian-core-1.2.21 / Eric Lindblad
Test 1 by Eric Lindblad 07-09-2015
http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com
The 'ambiguous overload' error cited 28-08-2015 was
unaffected from adding the below #ifdef following
incidents of the string #include <sys/types> in all
relevant xapian-core-1.2.21 files.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libuuid/
libuuid-1.0.3.tar.gz
the following lines can be added to uuidP.h from the
2015 Sep 10
0
Fwd: Interix issue resolved / Eric Lindblad
Eric, please keep these discussions on list.
J
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Eric Lindblad <geirfuglaps at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Interix issue resolved / Eric Lindblad
> Date: 10 September 2015 10:01:06 BST
> To: James Aylett <james-xapian at tartarus.org>
>
> J.,
>
> Looks like the 'ambiguous overload' error* was due to Interix gcc-3.3
2016 Dec 08
2
remotetcp_chert
Dear Olly Betts,
same 32 bit
compiler version
hardware
OS
OS version
as here (where remotetcp_chert passed and skipped 3)
xapian-core-1.2.21.tar.xz
http://nurmi-labs.blogspot.com/2015/10/xapian.html
./apitest backend remoteprog_brass: All 225 tests passed, 3 skipped.
./apitest backend remotetcp_brass: All 225 tests passed, 3 skipped.
./apitest backend remoteprog_chert: All 225 tests passed,
2016 Dec 16
1
testing
Having modified software packages' creation scripts some of which use patches, I'm familiar with their use and authorship. It was the specific patch Olly mentioned which I did not know yet if it was needed or indicated.
Obviously autoconf is indicated for a bootstrap when xapian is obtained from Github, but, the package maintainer for the MSYS2/MINGW xapian-core1.4.1 had not listed
2015 Sep 09
0
Vista Ultimate (or Enterprise) / Eric Lindblad
Vista Ultimate by Eric Lindblad
http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com
Email: GeirfuglApS <at> yahoo.com
I there anyone with a 32 bit Vista Ultimate (or Enteprise) box who would be willing to download from MS & install 'Utilities and SDK for UNIX-based Applications_X86.exe', compile & install make-3.81 as gmake in /usr, compile & install m4-1.4.9 as gm4 in /usr, compile
2015 Jun 19
1
REPLY: make check xapian-bindings-1.2.21 & Search-Xapian-1.2.21.0
Dear Olly Betts,
I think the tests for the perl module Search-Xapian-1.2.21.0 might be fewer in number than the perl tests included with xapian-bindings-1.2.21. If some of the tests have similar but modified content I do not know. I am not so skilled as to interpret the compared test results.
If you want to suggest a paired earlier version of Xapian to a specific xapian.bindings version,
I might
2015 Sep 05
1
question / errors Interix 3.5 / xapian-core-1.2.21 / Eric Lindblad
Question by Eric Lindblad 05-09-2015
http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com
I would enquire if anyone has an opinion on whether it might be a possibility that adding the following #ifdef in certain xapian-core-1.2.21 /common and/or /backends files following the string #include <sys/types.h> might move closer towards resolution the 'ambiguous overload' issue.
+#ifdef __INTERIX
+#
2016 Dec 14
1
testing
Regarding the earlier mail about [xapian-core-1.2.24] /tests/api_replicate.cc
compiled under MSYS/MINGW (g++ 5.3.0).
It seems likely that the error was specific to certain g++ versions.
https://github.com/mxe/mxe/issues/1448
Eric at ERICS-NETBOOK /c/WORK
$ cat test.cpp
#include <stdlib.h>
int setenv(const char *name, const char *value, int overwrite)
{
return _putenv_s(name, value);
}
2016 Dec 14
1
testing
xapian-core-1.2.24
Unclear yet about any possible use of patches, either for MSYS/MINGW and/or MSYS2/MINGW, for xapian-core versions(?), but here are sections of the 'configure' and 'make check' logs I output from a MSYS/MINGW (g++ 5.3.0) compile on XP SP3 (32 bit) Home Edition (xapian-core-1.2.24).
configure log
checking for setenv... no
checking for _putenv_s... yes
2015 Aug 07
1
xapian 1.2.21 / MSYS-1.0.11.exe
Xapian Developers,
[I initially thought to install xapian on SFU (Interix 3.5) on MS XP but could not compile libuuid]
[getopt.h, inttypes.h, and stdint.h taken from SUA (for Vista) and installed in SFU (Interix 3.5)]
If someone is inclined to write a modified libuuid and label it for use with Interix <version(s)> to
satisfy the dependency for an xapian <version(s)> install on
2016 Feb 25
0
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:30:55PM +0100, Eric J wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:17:35 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Eric wrote:
> >> % package require xapian 1.0.0
> >> 1.2.18
> >
> > I've tested with 1.2.18 and can't reproduce this with that version
> > either (is that also
2016 Feb 25
0
Database left unlocked by Tcl bindings
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:17PM +0100, Eric J wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:24:51 +0000, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> > It's clearly not as simple as execl() always releasing the lock, but I
> > don't think we've ruled out the OS entirely yet - the above isn't
> > exactly equivalent to the Tcl code, as the two databases are created by