similar to: Reducing Xapian memory usage

Dear friends My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU is PEOPLE. What i should mention in smb.conf ? If i mention ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to authenticate. Please guide me. Thanks -- http://linuxinterviews.blogspot.com

Dear all May be this question asked earlier in list but i didn't able to search exact . I have samba+ldap domain setup on RHEL 5.1 and samba version is 3.0.28. Today i got a windows 7 system , but i am not able to join that system in our samba+ldap domain. Do i need to do any registry tweaking. I can't upgrade own samba version beyond 3.0.33 because this maximum version i get if i update

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 06:36:25PM -0500, Ryan Cross wrote: > After upgrades my stack is now: > > Python 2.7 > Django 1.8 > Haystack 2.6.0 > Xapian 1.4.3. (latest xapian haystack backend with some modifications) > > Using the same rebuild command as below but with —batch-size=50000 > > The issue has now become one of performance. I am indexing 2.2 million >

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Saad Ahmed <ch.saad.ahmed at gmail.com> Date: 3 February 2015 at 21:10 Subject: Waiting for Reply regarding "TestCases Failure" To: Xapian Development <xapian-devel at lists.xapian.org> I have been waiting for reply regarding any further steps to take. Following are the outputs of commands that you asked me to run. All these

Greetings, I've been wondering about the index format and backwards compatibility. We're using the dev version (for chert) and each svn up means that any indexes created prior to this revision cannot be read. Is this purely a cautious move to prevent errors, and, barring any obvious index format changes, can I safely force the current revision to read existing indexes? eg, by

Please find my inline reply. On 27 January 2015 at 03:02, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > The script which automates most of the release process runs "make > distcheck", which runs the testsuite, so these tests didn't fail for me > when I made the 1.3.2 release. > > When I run "make distcheck" in the "build" folder, it gives

As Chert backend is not the default Xapian backend for the 1.2 branch, I am thinking about switching from Flint to Chert. However, I am wondering how do both compare in performance and index size? My indexes are updated quite frequently, so this is my priority. Which is better in this case? Regards, PK

Hi, What's the main difference between chert and flint? What above vs lucene? I am mainly asking about data structure (lexicon, posting list, document data), what's in memory, what's on disk, hash vs b-tree and reasons behind them. Any pointer is appreciated. Thanks! Crystal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

So, given what I've read in the documentation I would create a text file named document_database.txt that might have the following: remote 192.168.1.10:30000 chert /var/lib/xapian_database/segment1 remote 192.168.1.10:30000 chert /var/lib/xapian_database/segment2 remote 192.168.1.10:30000 chert /var/lib/xapian_database/segment3 etc. I would then in my PHP program open

Hi, I have had reports that Recoll has become unbearingly slow in some instances. After inquiry, this happens with Xapian 1.4 only, and the part which does not work any more is the snippets extraction. Recoll builds snippets by partially reconstructing documents out of index contents. For this, after determining a set of document term positions to be displayed (around the hopefully interesting

Hi, I am new to xapian and read somewhere that xapain was using flint before released version 1.1 now it is using chert. I am looking for differences between both flint vs chert respective to xapian and advantages of chert. thanks Smriti

Hi! Suppose you have a huge notmuch/Xapian database, built on a 32-bit system (well, actually on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, but using a years old 32-bit notmuch binary; notmuch 0.9, Xapian 1.2.21 -- don't laugh), and suppose you're finally going to update that years old notmuch installation (release by release, forward-porting a bunch of patches). Naturally, I'd now do a native 64-bit

Hello, Does anyone know, did the on-disk-format change between Xapian 1.1.2 and 1.1.4 ? Greetings from Austria Marcus

can samba mount the whole windows system on a computer by default.. suppose id i have 8 partitions on my hard disk (C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J).. when i mount windows, will all partitions be mounted or just C drive... your only special contact on earth

dear all I am using winbind to get ADz user on samba. The problem i facing is related with group. To clear the problem i am taking an example There is a AD user that belong to "Domain users" and "Marketting" Group, the new file/folder created by that user has group ownership "Domain users" but i want that "Marketting" should be group owner. Is it

I am suffering for slow searching performance on Xapian. I am using Xapian for indexing about 150,000,000 documents. It was implemented in C++; The performance of searching was not that fast. e.g. Searching a query, which includes about 20 terms, needs 2 secs avg. For searching, I followed such steps: 1. construct a QueryParser for certain string 2. parse the query to get a Xapian::Query

I am new to samba and i am planning to use samba for a particular task... i want to mount about 100 windows terminals on my linux server and then run them through a process.. they might be mounted at once or serially... when something of this nature happens, u have many different type of machine configurations.. some might have different windows versions running (e.g.95,98,XP,3.11,2000) and

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 04:25:29PM +0000, James Aylett wrote: > That?s exactly how it?s supposed to work. ?Eventually? (once the > writer gets sufficiently far ahead of the reader), the reader will get > a DatabaseModifiedError and will have to re-open the database, but > until then it?s up to it when it does so. You may wish to do it every > N requests, or every K seconds, or only

Olly Betts writes: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:29:09AM +0100, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote: > > Recoll builds snippets by partially reconstructing documents out of index > > contents. > > > [...] > > > > The specific operation which has become slow is opening many term position > > lists, each quite short. > > The difference will actually

Hi Olly, Thanks for the detailed response. I hadn’t realized there was a new xapian haystack backend. I’m going to try that but I have some upgrades to do first. Django 1.8, etc. Thanks, Ryan > On Feb 28, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:29:46AM -0800, Ryan Cross wrote: >> I am trying to rebuild an index of 2+