similar to: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Bernd wrote: > >> Laine wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On >> Behalf Of >>> Laine Stump >>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM >>> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com >>> Cc: Lentes, Bernd >>>

Bernd wrote: > > Laine wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of > > Laine Stump > > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge > > network

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:57 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

All, This is a fresh, un-f#$ked-with OpenSUSE install after adding the Tumbleweed repository and doing a dup. I installed the Hypervisor with Tools for which it prompted me for Xen or QEMU and I chose Xen. No bridge was made. When I go to create a fully virtualised machine, it nao has the error: Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Could not find the bridge, and none was specified.

Hello, I have been using xen under open-suse 11.4 for almost half an year now. This week I had to reformat the provider and so I did install everything again (now there is a dual boot and microsoft windows server 2008 installed on the first half partition of the disk) again open-suse 11.4 and xen. I do start the xen kernel at grub but when I try to connect and/or creat a new domU the folling

Bernd wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-users- > bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Lentes, Bernd > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 5:12 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > Laine wrote: > > ... > > Hi Laine,

On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Hi, > > i'm currently installing a SLES 12 64bit system. libvirt-client-1.2.5-13.3.x86_64 and libvirt-daemon-1.2.5-13.3.x86_64. > Formerly I created my vm's (KVM) using a traditional bridge in my host systems, mostly SLES 11 SP3. > But with SLES 12 I don't succeed. I can use the macvtap device in the host, but I like to be

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

Hi, this is propably bridge related and not really a xen problem, but it might help someone: Some of our domUs are not able to arp. Arp -n show (incomplete), and doing a tcpdump shows, that on the dom0''s eth0 the arp request goes out, the response comes in, but on the vifX.0 interface the arp response is gone. dom0# tcpdump -ni eth0 arp who-has 10.32.2.51 tell 10.32.7.70 arp reply

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

Hi, i have a two node cluster with virtual guests as resources. I'd like to snapshot the guests once in the night and thought i had a procedure. But i realize that things in a cluster are a bit more complicated than expected :-)) I will shutdown the guests to have a clean snapshot. I can shutdown the guests via pacemaker. But then arises the first problem: When i issue a "virsh

18. Juli 2017 16:45, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: > On 07/18/2017 04:31 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I have upgraded all libvirt packages to version 3.5.0-655.1 and restarted host. > > That wasn't necessary. It's not Windows ;-) > >> This is the current default network config: >> ld4004:~

Hi, see the log below root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu

Goodday, First my network layout: dsl router (10.0.0.99) | server (eth0 10.0.0.1, eth1 10.0.1.10) | 3 times windows machine (10.0.1.2, 10.0.1.3, 10.0.1.4) (all with proxy settings 10.0.1.10:8080) Now on the server is mandrake 10 installed with shorewall as firewall. And a apache webserver (and no ftp server). When i turned internet sharing on it started squid which added a line in the

Dear Samba-List, i'm new to the list and new to samba. Right now I'm trying setup a samba ADDC serving around 50 Windows 10 clients and a couple of linux clients. My ADDC Host has two NICs, eth0 should be connected to the wan - network, eth1 should be connect to a 10.* network, serving the windows and linux clients. The ADDC is up and running, serving only the 10.* network. I

Hi, I have already tried to change for bindaddr=0.0.0.0 but it didn't worked. 2016-08-26 11:44 GMT-03:00, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com>: > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:12 -0300, Vitor Mazuco wrote: > >> bindaddr = all > > Try: > > bindaddr=0.0.0.0 > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________

Pacemaker always knows where its resources are running. Query it, stop the domain, then use the queried location as the host to which to issue the snapshot? Cheers, Peter On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 20:36 Lentes, Bernd, < bernd.lentes@helmholtz-muenchen.de> wrote: > Hi, > > i have a two node cluster with virtual guests as resources. > I'd like to snapshot the guests once in the

Hi, I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. To save myself from configuring all VLANs on the KVM host, I'd like to hand the entire

Hi, Is it possible that "virsh destroy" does not stop a domain ? I'm asking because i have some domains running in a two-node HA-Cluster (pacemaker). And sometimes one node get fenced (killed) because it couldn't stop a domain. That's very ugly. This is also the reason why i asked before what "virsh destroy" really does ? IIRC a kill -9 can't terminate a