similar to: Questión about DNS config on dnsmasq

On dovecot 2.2.12 compiled from source I use ActiveSync with kolab-syncroton. When running a test i have this imap log: [29-Mar-2014 22:58:25 +0200]: [F658] S: A0004 OK Getmetadata completed. [29-Mar-2014 22:58:25 +0200]: [F658] C: A0005 SETMETADATA INBOX (/private/vendor/kolab/activesync "{\"DEVICE\":{\"601099122\":{\"ID\":

On 04/10/2014 08:12 PM, Johannes Kastl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10.04.2014 13:08 Laine Stump wrote: >> On 04/06/2014 08:33 AM, Johannes Kastl wrote: >>> There was a bug in libvirt for quite awhile that caused >>> locally-unresolved requests for hostnames in the domain given by >>> the network's <domain

On 04/06/2014 08:33 AM, Johannes Kastl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi everyone, > > maybe this is an old fart, but I cant get it to work. > > I am running libvirt on a laptop, where a dnsmasq is already running > to delegate dns info for my local (not-public) network. My resolv.conf > (on the host) lists the system-dnsmasq as first

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10.04.2014 13:08 Laine Stump wrote: > On 04/06/2014 08:33 AM, Johannes Kastl wrote: >> There was a bug in libvirt for quite awhile that caused >> locally-unresolved requests for hostnames in the domain given by >> the network's <domain name='xyzzy'/> element to be dropped rather >> than forwarded. Is

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dnsmasq A dnsmasq log about DHCP events has the interface name in it. Interface names are allowed to have a dash (-) in them, but the logcheck filter does not have the dash in it. Please add the dash. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500,

Dear all, I'm currently trying out Samba4.0.0-alpha10. Because I'm unfamiliar with the Berkeley Internet Name Demon (bind), I've so far been using dnsmasq on my home network. I just want to inform eveybody who cares that it's possible to set up Samba4 and dnsmasq so as to allow domain logons from a Windows 7 workstation. Generally, I followed the how-to on the samba-wiki

Hello-- I'm trying to work through the last piece of the puzzle regarding dns resolution for my guests. To do so I'd like to be able to pass the following to the dnsmasq child process: -S /private.net/127.0.0.1 (as referenced in the dnsmasq man page) -S /sub.private.net/127.0.0.1 However, I cannot find any documentation that suggests the xml schema defining the virtual network supports

Package: logcheck I'm running dnsmasq-2.52 on a Gentoo Linux server, and the default rules for dnsmasq needed a few minor updates. See attached patch for suggested changes. Here are the relevant log lines: Jan 1 12:07:11 hq dnsmasq-dhcp[4093]: DHCPNAK(eth0) 192.168.20.107 00:26:37:a0:75:57 wrong server-ID Jan 1 12:28:39 hq dnsmasq-dhcp[4093]: DHCPNAK(eth0) 192.168.20.107

Hi list, On updating my server today, I noted that dnsmasq was updated, I do not recall installing this onto my server as it is running bind/named and dhcpd, thus why does it need dnsmasq? So I did a $> sudo yum remove dnsmasq to find out what rpm / yum thinks about it - I get a list of NetworkManager(-glib) removals evolution(-connector) removals krb5-auth-dialog also...... I think I can

libvirtd is starting dnsmasq! This is on RHEL5.5 I don't see it mentioned in /etc/init.d/libvirtd or /etc/libvirt/* or /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd 4337 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/dnsmasq --strict-order --bind-interfaces --pid-file=/var/run/libvirt/network/default.pid --conf-file= --listen-address 192.168.122.1 --except-interface lo --dhcp-range 192.168.122.2,192.168.122.254

> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:11:44 -0400 > From: laine at laine.org > To: libvir-list at redhat.com > Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq > > On 03/22/2012 09:10 AM, Daniele Milani wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have the following situation: > > -I replaced the standard bridge driver with the Open VSwitch one; > > I'm curious what

Virtual networks can now be created and destroyed with a r/o filesystem. Signed-off-by: Michael Burns <mburns at redhat.com> --- common-post.ks | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-post.ks b/common-post.ks index 44a0270..5531e08 100644 --- a/common-post.ks +++ b/common-post.ks @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ rm -f /etc/cron.daily/logrotate sed -i

On 04/13/2014 10:23 PM, Johannes Kastl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Laine, > > thanks for the answer. > > On 13.04.14 16:13 Laine Stump wrote: > >> There is no provision for that. If you want additional hosts to be >> known by the libvcirt instance of dnsmasq, you must enter them into >> the xml. > I can set the

List, Per someone's suggestion (thanks, whoever you were) from this list, I implemented dnsmasq to prevent the issue of resolving DNS when the net connection goes down. This morning the net connection was down, and our * server didn't miss a beat. I recommend looking into: http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html And http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/3377351

Thanks All for the suggestions. I was still using iptables - not firewalld - I did miss the UDP port 53. That was my issue. Thanks Niki for the article and everyone. Thanks again. Jerry

Hi Niki, Thanks good article... I was close in what I did - but still not working. I made this config file in /etc/dnsmasq.d more lsi.conf domain-needed bogus-priv interface = eth0 expand-hosts local = / LayeredSolutionsInc.com / domain = LayeredSolutionsInc.com # The address 192.168.1.14 is the static IP of this server # You can find this ip by running ifconfig and look for the # IP of the

Are you sure you have opened 53/udp ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov ? ??????, 31 ???????? 2020 ?., 16:15:10 ???????+2, Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> ??????: Hi Niki, Thanks good article... I was close in what? I did - but still not working. I made this config file in /etc/dnsmasq.d more lsi.conf domain-needed bogus-priv interface = eth0 expand-hosts local = /

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 15068053a0aeea31232c06e17b88d2e7 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.i386.rpm Source: 88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm --

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm Source: 88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm --

On 24.04.2015 12:45, mimicafe@gmail.com wrote: > I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged > network mode, however I still have the default virtual network > bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand > is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*) > still play any role. If not, can I