similar to: How to use blockcopy in libvirt-java

Dear Michal After I fix the local libvirt master branch follow your patch, and build rpm for CentOS 7.4. virDomainUpdateDeviceFlags as bellow: ================================================ 2018-02-27 09:27:43.782+0000: 16656: debug : virDomainUpdateDeviceFlags:8326 : dom=0x7f2084000c50, (VM: name=6ec499397d594e f2a64fcfc938f38225, uuid=6ec49939-7d59-4ef2-a64f-cfc938f38225), xml=<disk

I know pc-lint is working fine on detecting some nasty coding fault. But is it illegal implement it in clang? And also there is so much other tools for code analyze:) 2010/3/26, yiqiuping1986 <yiqiuping1986 at 126.com>: > 呵呵，不急，还有一学期的时间。 > > > 2010-03-26 > > > > yiqiuping1986 > > > > 发件人： 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) > 发送时间： 2010-03-26 15:05:33 > 收件人：

Hi, ALL, I just look for the class and method to use blockcopy in libvirt-java on this page: http://libvirt.org/sources/java/javadoc/ However, I can not find out. Libvirt-java Support blockcopy ? Thanks. Best Regards, Star Guo

or you can just add a built-in function in c frontend "readadcreg()" and emit it as llvm.zhu.readadcreg(), so you can just call the built-in function to get the adc register value. On 2010-1-4 21:27, Demon(Xiangyang) Zhu 朱向阳 wrote: > Hi Ether, > > Thank you very much. I will try it soon as your description. > > Regards > > ________________________________________

Hi Martin: Actually, I have installed all the debuginfo for this coredump file. But the netcf debuginfo report "mismatch" as below: warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libnetcf.so.1.4.0.debug" does not match "/lib64/libnetcf.so.1" (CRC mismatch). So I ignore this warning before. You can check what I did on the attachment

Thanks. I have already previewed the xenctrl.h. The following is what I understand: libxc is compiled to a file name after 'xc**' endding with '.so', xend communicates with domain0 through xc and domain0 communicates with hypervisor through privcmd. What's the privcmd? ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Wei

Thanks for your response, I found that the server's kernel has been changed so I installed the official kernel by yum. but there still question: /usr/bin/virsh -c lxc:/// start instance-00000011 error: Failed to start domain instance-00000011 error: internal error Child process (PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin LIBVIRT_DEBUG=3 LIBVIRT_LOG_OUTPUTS=3:stderr /usr/libexec/libvirt_lxc --name

Hi Keir: I am sorry trouble you again. I want to emulate instruction "push %ebp" in Xen. I found the function emulate_privilege_op does not satisfy this requirement. Then I resort to x86_emulate. I construct the x86_emulate_ctxt and reuse the "ptwr_emulate_ops". code like this: extern const struct x86_emulate_ops ptwr_emulate_ops; in do_general_protection { .... struct

Hi, Olly: I post the error in the attachment, any methods to fix it? Run the command (.\lemon.exe -q -oqueryparser_internal.cc -hqueryparser_token.h queryparser.lemony) will get the error. If it is hard to fix, I will upgrade xapian to 1.4. But I worry it will cost me too much time to modify my application code. Thanks a lot. Here is the error details: lemon.c: #define LISTSIZE 30

Hi, dear LLVMers I am Qiuping Yi. I am interested in John's SoC project idea, developing Clang's support for detecting undefined behaviors in C/C++, and hope John to be my mentor. I wish to implement detecting some undefined behaivors ranging from easy (such as detecting divide by zero) to rather troublesome ones (such as detecting references to out-of-scope automatic variables). I

John, Many thanks for your prompt reply! You think it a better idea than a new implementation of bounds overflow checking, that integrating previous work such as this: http://llvm.org/pubs/2006-05-24-SAFECode-BoundsCheck.html into current LLVM. Yes? 在 2010年3月31日 下午12:11，John Regehr <regehr at cs.utah.edu>写道： > Hi Qiuping, > > I don't know much about SAFECode, you should

Hi, I am sorry that just now I give the wrong URL which is a private mood. The next URLs are right: Update the SAFCode project to the new LLVM API http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/easyqiu/t127038894856 Check bounds overflow bugs in C programs based on LLVM http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/easyqiu/t126993884556 ABCD:

On 7/27/16 8:54 PM, ZhaoKang wrote: > Jon, > > Thanks a lot for your reply! > We will look the detailed implementation in LLVM. > In my opinion, it seems that SetVector class just defines such type, which is has the same efficiency with set, but stays a stable order. Time-efficiency for set lookup should be the same. Space-efficiency on the other hand is lost because the addition

----- Forwarded message from 雁渡寒潭 <chnlcq@qq.com> ----- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:38:41 +0800 From: 雁渡寒潭 <chnlcq@qq.com> To: rjones <rjones@redhat.com> Subject: 回复： [Libguestfs] 回复： virt-builder problem thank you vrey much! problem is&nbsp;Resolved！ http://archive.libguestfs.org/builder/index.asc&nbsp; &nbsp;is blocked! I'M disables it! But i can&nbsp;

thanks your mail，now below： If the KVM supports nested VMX and QEMU starts with the arguments -enable-kvm and -cpu ..., + vmx, then the LOCK bit of the guest MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL and Enable VMX out of SMX operation bit will be set. Well, I should add -enable-kvm parameters of the document which xml position, Exactly speaking, how to amend xml configuration file?

Where is the patch?I can help to get this integrated -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jra at samba.org] 发送时间: 2016年9月1日 7:57 收件人: Michael Adam 抄送: zhengbin 08747 (RD); weidong 12656 (RD); 'samba at lists.samba.org' 主题: Re: [Samba] status of Continuous availability in SMB3 On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Michael Adam via samba wrote: > On 2016-08-31 at 08:13 +0000,

Hi Jeremy Sorry to disturb you. I notice that at several months ago, you offered a patch about the frontend SMB support for the CA feature at mailing list(as shown below). Thanks for your help and thanks for the generosity of Simplivity. It benefits me a lot. Then, up to now, 1) Are there any updated versions about this frontend patch? 2) Are there any patches about

Hi: In the using the speex software, we found that the "speex_alloc" of the code did not check whether the memory was allocated and used it directly. Is there a security risk? Is there a solution for this? For example(Attached code screenshot): speex-1.2rc1: sb_celp.c Line From 242 to 251. (in function sb_encoder_init) -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jmvalin at

Hi, the problem is as follows:(And then, others can't login mostly because of the os' busing and you can't do anything else.) [**@xentest ::三 12月 21::~]$ sudo xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 1748 2 r----- 29396.3 xp-101 1 256

On 06/10/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: > Am 10.06.13 09:07, schrieb Kashyap Chamarthy: >> On 06/09/2013 02:46 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I just tried the following: >>> >>> virsh dumpxml --security-info gentoo-template > gentoo-template.xml >>> virsh snapshot-create gentoo-template >>> virsh undefine