similar to: snapshots and qcow2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "snapshots and qcow2"

2014 Dec 08
0
Re: snapshots and qcow2
On 12/08/2014 03:03 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into a strange behavior with libvirt snapshots. I have some vms > running with thin-provisioned qcow2 disk images (libvirt 1.1.3 with fedora > 20). > * When I create a snapshot on the VM, the qcow file suddenly grows big, > somewhat bigger than the maximum size of the disk. The maximum (guest) size of a disk is
2013 May 08
9
blktap2 and qcow2 images
Hi There, I''ve been trying to get this to work for the last couple of days, but found no information on the internet that would help. Essentially, a tap-ctl opencommand with a qcow2 image does not work (error code 2) and produces the following line in syslog: tap-ctl: tap-err:tap_ctl_open: open failed, err -2 I have attached a shell script that reproduces the problem on my machine. The
2019 Aug 13
2
Recover snapshots from qcow images
Hi guys, I had to move to the new laptop week ago and I screw migration of my virtual machines. I recovered my virtual machines on the new laptop (virsh define) using the backed up xml files, but I am missing any file with metadata about snapshots. The original storage is cleaned so I cannot take these files anymore. Using qemu-info I can see my snapshots inside the qcow images, but libvirt
2018 Jan 30
4
Create qcow2 v3 volumes via libvirt
Hi all, on a fully patched CentOS 7.4 x86-64, I see the following behavior: - when creating a new volumes using vol-create-as, the resulting file is a qcow2 version 2 (compat=0.10) file. Example: [root@gdanti-lenovo vmimages]# virsh vol-create-as default zzz.qcow2 8589934592 --format=qcow2 --backing-vol /mnt/vmimages/centos6.img Vol zzz.qcow2 created [root@gdanti-lenovo vmimages]# file
2014 Aug 21
2
Re: virsh snapshot
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com> To: "Adam King" <kinga@sghs.org.uk>, libvirt-users@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:17:09 AM Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] virsh snapshot On 08/20/2014 06:34 PM, Adam King wrote: > Hi, > [Can you convince your mailer to wrap long lines?] > > I had a 'domain' called
2016 Sep 03
2
Re: internal snapshot question
hi Martin, thanks again for the feedback. maybe you have noted that I am not yet all too familiar with those tools. this is now sort of working for me. But I sense that you seem this method to be less then ideal. Reading through the virsh manual it looks like ... $ virsh snapshot-create [domain] --disk-only --live ... might be doing a similar thing. Maybe more elegant (pure virsh) and on a
2014 Aug 21
1
Re: virsh snapshot
> Your quoting is horrible. You used the same prefix for your original > content as for my reply (">> >" in both cases). I'm not sure what > mailer you are using, but it is making conversation difficult. OK, let's see if this is better. Turned out my email app wasn't doing text wrap and quoting prefix default was bizarre....my apologies. > > >
2011 Sep 27
2
Snapshot Error
Hey When I want to take a snapshot for a Domain by using virDomainSnapshotCreateXML. The Error as below happen: libvir: QEMU error : Requested operation is not valid: Disk '/var/lib/libvirt/images/fedora-qcow.qcow2' does not support snapshotting The snapshot Configuration is : <domainsnapshot> <description>Snapshot of OS install and updates</description>
2017 Jul 13
1
compression method for qcow2?
I found guestfs_compress_out do the compression to gzip, bzip2, compress...etc. I want to compress qcow2, and I found details about qcow2 compression in https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/qcow-image-format.html The QCOW format supports compression by allowing each cluster to be > independently compressed with zlib. Can I do that with guestfs_compress_out?
2018 Dec 08
1
import qcow with snapshots
All, is it possible to create a new KVM machine from an existing qcow (v3) image with snapshots? snapshot-list doesn't show them, when using virt-manager 1:1.5.1-0ubuntu1.1 to create the machine. * t-ad5.img: QEMU QCOW Image (v3), 42949672960 bytes chris@cd:/data/md0$ qemu-img snapshot -l t-ad5.img Snapshot list: ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1
2017 Jul 11
2
Is there still no easier way to shrink a VM image?
I have numerous qcow2 images which need to be reduced in size and have their maximum size (virtual size) reduced. Physical disk space became so low that VMs "auto-paused" themselves, I moved enough images to solve the immediate problem but need to rectify the underlying issue. It seems that qcow[2] files are grown in size such that the data inside of them takes about 50-60% of the
2017 Jul 11
2
Re: Is there still no easier way to shrink a VM image?
Thanks for letting me know I'm not making myself clear, let me try again with a few more specifics, These are Windows VMs with three disk images for C:, D: and L:. To simplify I'll focus on the image for C: which had grown to 77G physical size on the hypervisor's ssd (I just double-checked that with 'ls -al' because qemu-img below says 70G, this image had two snapshots at one
2016 Sep 03
2
internal snapshot question
I take an internal snapshot (VM is 'shutdown' when taking it) of a qcow2 image like this: $ qemu-img snapshot -c sn1 [my_image].qcow2 I see that snapshot when asking for: $ qemu-img info [my_image].qcow but do NOT see it with: $ virsh domblklist [my_domain] is that how it is meant to be?
2011 Oct 14
21
xl create PV guest with qcow/qcow2 disk images fail
Hi, List, I''m trying xl create a pv guest with qcow/qcow2 image, it always fails at libxl_device_disk_local_attach. #xl create pv_config_file libxl: error: libxl.c:1119:libxl_device_disk_local_attach: cannot locally attach a qdisk image if the format is not raw libxl: error: libxl_create.c:467:do_domain_create: failed to run bootloader: -3 disk configuration is: disk=[
2017 Jul 31
1
claiming unsused space back
If you are using XFS - there is mount option "discard|nodiscard" From XFS man page: discard|nodiscard Enable/disable the issuing of commands to let the block device reclaim space freed by the filesystem. This is useful for SSD devices, thinly provisioned LUNs and virtual machine images, but may have a performance impact. Note: It is currently
2017 Apr 23
1
External snapshot issue
I have used virsh snapshot-create-as <VM name> <snapshot name> "<snapshot description>" --diskspec "vda,snapshot=external,file=/path/to/external-snapshot" --disk-only --atomic to create an external snapshot of a running VM. I followed it with virsh blockpull <VM name> --path /path/to/external-snapshot and monitored it until done.
2009 Dec 21
26
Questions on qcow, qcow2 versus LVM
I''ve been using lvm under centos to create the backing store for domUs and although the performance seems acceptable it has some shortcomings. The biggest of which is the LVM bug which prevents me from removing an lv (it says it is still mounted and it definitely isnt). I thought this was just a centos bug but it appears to be evident in debian and ubuntu too and I really can''t
2013 Apr 12
1
after snapshot-delete, the qcow2 image file size doesn't decrease
After snapshot-delete, the qcow2 image file size doesn't decrease, isn't that a waste of disk space? Would someone please tell me how to decrease the file size when snapshot-delete, if that's possible? The image file name of my virtual machine is d0.qcow As follows: [root at test1 ]# virsh list Id Name State
2017 Apr 04
2
Live migration with non-shared ZFS volume
Hi all, I'm using ZFS on Linux block volumes as my VM storage and want to do live migrations between hypervisors. If I create ZFS snapshot of used volume on source host, send it do destination host (zfs send/recv) and then run live migration with VIR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_DISK flag, the migration works OK. But this procedure copies the whole disk twice which is a huge downside. The best
2017 Jul 31
5
claiming unsused space back
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:28:49AM -0500, Leroy Tennison wrote: > I realize this is wandering off-topic but, if you have found Debian commands, you're doing better than me. What are they? Also, are you allowing dd to totally fill the partition (what I have found on the web as a recommendation)? If so, is the OS surviving acceptably? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: