similar to: hostdev a Xeon Phi

hi everybody I'm having I pretty regular setup, so I'd like to think. Guest network is to use passthrough and a DNS+DHCP on a neighbour system gets requests and then DHCP updates DNS records but with libvirt host's name instead of guest's. Am I missing something here? How do make a guest claim DNS update and the not host on which that guest is running? many thanks P.

virt-v2v obviously cannot convert this kind of devices, since they are specific to the host of the hypervisor. Thus, emit a warning about the presence of passthrough host devices, so at least this can be noticed when converting a guest. --- v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml b/v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml index

SimplifyCFG FoldTwoEntryPhiNode looks to simplify all 2 entry phi nodes in a block, if it can't do them all then it won't do any and returns. There is a lot of code that is directly in this function geared toward this requirement. Is it possible currently to get this function (or pass) to simply fold "some" of the phis (without having to fold them all?). I understand that

I guess I thought that once I redirected the branches and created new PHIs that LLVM would correct the variable usage when I return true (changed CFG) from the pass. Is this not the case? On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the code snippet that I am using to create the PHIs in the loop > according to the PHIs in the new preheader. At

> the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL. If you're doing a conversion from LLVM IR to some other non-SSA IR (like the tool's), you can do the phi node removal yourself as you convert. Basically, every predecessor block referenced by a phi node will have an assignment to that variable before branching. There are techniques to make the resultant

Conditional on the target supporting cmov? Though that's probably not optimal. On Wed, Feb 5, 2020, 7:47 AM Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:08 PM Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > SimplifyCFG FoldTwoEntryPhiNode looks to simplify all 2 entry phi nodes > in a block, if it

Here is the code snippet that I am using to create the PHIs in the loop according to the PHIs in the new preheader. At this point I have already redirected the loop backedge and removed the preheader from the loop. for (BasicBlock::iterator II = loopHeaderBB->begin(); (PN=dyn_cast<PHINode>(II)); ++II) { // remove loop back PHI and add it to split BB

On 30.8.2011, at 19.19, Eli Friedman wrote: > reg2mem won't do quite this transformation... not sure exactly what you need. I need to get rid of phis. This code is compiled from C++ and for some functions there are no phis, but multiple call instructions. I am targeting hardware in the end, and the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL. My questions may

Misha Brukman wrote: > LLVM Machine code is in SSA. This explains quite a lot. I though it's possible to just reduce convert phis into copy instructions in predecessors -- all of which will have the same destination register. > gets you two definitions of r. So we have machine PHI nodes merge the > two possible values into one for result of r. These phis get removed > after

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Misha Brukman wrote: > > > LLVM Machine code is in SSA. > > This explains quite a lot. I though it's possible to just reduce convert phis > into copy instructions in predecessors -- all of which will have the same > destination register. There are algorithms for eliminating PHI nodes, but they aren't quite so simple.

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Teemu Rinta-aho <teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com> wrote: > On 30.8.2011, at 19.19, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> reg2mem won't do quite this transformation... not sure exactly what you need. > > I need to get rid of phis. This code is compiled from C++ and for some functions > there are no phis, but multiple call instructions. I am

On Sep 13, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote: > On Sep 13, 2010, at 11:11 AM, John McCall wrote: >> On Sep 13, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote: >>> >> We do emit phis when the semantics aren't defined in terms of memory, >> e.g. with expressions that have multiple paths of control flow (like the >> conditional operator or null-checked

It sounds like Transforms/Utils/SSAUpdater may be what you are looking for. A good example of how to use it -- one that sounds very similar to what you're doing -- can be found in Transforms/Scalar/LoopRotation.cpp On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am splitting a one BB loop into two BB. > > Basically, the one loop BB has 3 incoming

I have attached a case of what I am trying to do, I'm pretty sure I'm just missing some simple API call. In the cfg you can see that although Im setting "lsr.iv441" as "lsr.iv44" from for.body.387.i it's not propagating that through the block or graph. On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am splitting a one BB

I guess not since Value is a superclass of Instruction. On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:36 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Updating PHI for Instruction Domination? > To: Eric Christopher <echristo at

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> Date: Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Updating PHI for Instruction Domination? To: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> Since I'm not sure which instructions I might want to replicate, would it be possible to cast the Value from "PHINode::getIncomingValue" to

You're creating a new path that doesn't include L. For all values defined in L and used outside of L, you need to determine the new reaching def. That's specific to your transformation and can't be automated. Once you do that, creating the phi in F is natural. -Andy On Feb 6, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > I guess not since Value is a

I am splitting a one BB loop into two BB. Basically, the one loop BB has 3 incoming values, one form back edge two from other edges. I want to extract the PHIs from the other two edges out into it's own BB and delete that from the loop, then redirect the backedge to the loopbody (non extracted portion) and create a new PHI coming from the extracted BB and the backedge. I can do this;

On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:12:58AM -0500, Vikram Adve wrote: > PHI nodes within machine code were originally used by the Sparc > back-end but they turned out not to be necessary. Actually, they are currently used in non-SparcV9 backends (see below). > Instead, LLVM phis are lowered to copy instructions in the machine > code (I believe this happens just after instruction selection).

Summary ======= I'm planning on adjusting SimplifyCFG so that it doesn't turn two-entry phi nodes into selects until later in the pass pipeline, to give passes which can understand phis but not selects more opportunity to optimize. The thing I'm trying to do which made me think of doing this is described below, but from the benchmarking I've done it looks like this is overall a