similar to: DHCP and Secure Containers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 Bug ID: 84880 Summary: [NV94] X freeze on nouveau list_del corruption / unable to handle kernel paging request Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87244 Bug ID: 87244 Summary: [NV94] X hangs, logs show kernel: nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] still angry after 101 spins, halt followed by an X trace Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: All Status: NEW

Hi I have got confused by ruby/gems etc as i seem to have some kind of path issues somehow. First issue is i seem to have 3 flavours of ruby installed ... # ruby -v ruby 1.9.3p374 (2013-01-15) [i686-linux] # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2012.01/bin/ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2011-12-28 MBARI 8/0x8770 on patchlevel 357) [i686-linux], MBARI 0x8770, Ruby Enterprise Edition 2012.01 # /opt/ruby/bin/ruby

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98129 Bug ID: 98129 Summary: X hung with nouveau 'INVALID_CMD' and 'INVALID_ADDRESS_ALIGNMENT' errors on GeForce 9600 GT [10de:0622] Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: All Status: NEW

I am a relative newcomer to using extlinux. I am running Fedora 20 which means I am using syslinux 4.05. When I noticied that all of your documentation said that booting off ext234 and btrfs was supported, I gave it a try. Indeed, this does work with the boot files and the extlinux directory installed into the btrfs (root) volume. Has any thought been given to supporting supporting

I was under the impression that the value of /etc/machine-id was unqiue for every OS installation on a system. This seems to be the case on real hardware. That is, if I install Fedora 19, Fedora 20, and Fedora-rawhide on a system, they will each have a different value for /etc/machine-id. This does not seem to be the case for qemy-kvm-libvirt virtual systems. SOmetimes they are different

On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 02:54 +0300, Ady wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2015 1:34 PM, "poma" <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It works OK as whole, for the current git: > > > > Excellent! This problem is solved. Now to commit a patch. > > > > --Gene > > Considering the different results that Adam got before,

On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 05:06 +0300, Ady wrote: > @Adam, > > Any news / results after applying Genec's proposed patch? > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-July/023727.html?; > > TIA, > Ady Sorry for the delay - I built a Fedora live image with that patch applied and it did boot OK. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter:

Adam Williamson (adamw) has done a fine job at determining how to get bridged networking working with NetworkManager: https://www.happyassassin.net/2014/07/23/bridged-networking-for-libvirt-with-networkmanager-2014-fedora-21/ According to Adam, he did the work on Fedora 21 whereas I did it on Fedora 20. the undesirable features (problems) I found may be corrected on F21 but I believe that

On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 > changes. I'm not an expert on the gcc package, but looking at the changelog it appears to be be following the upstream 5.x branch: * Thu Jun 18 2015 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com> 5.1.1-4 - update from the 5 branch - fix C++ ICE in

On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 22:39 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Adam Williamson > > I think it would be better if someone else confirms there's > > actually > > something to fix. > > There was indeed the shortcomming that byte values 128 to 255 > were treated as whitespace and mapped to "_" resp. "". > This would affect non-ASCII

Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 changes. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:02 PM Adam Williamson via Syslinux < syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 05:06 +0300, Ady wrote: > > @Adam, > > > > Any news / results after applying Genec's proposed patch? > > > >

Trying 5.2-rc now, will report back after the test case is run. On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 07:23 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: > > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 > > changes. > > I'm not an expert on the gcc package, but looking at the changelog it >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90145 Bug ID: 90145 Summary: [NV94] Corruption on very long (vertical) pages in Firefox Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Am 2017-03-07 13:01, schrieb Michal Privoznik: > On 03/07/2017 11:44 AM, Marko Weber | 8000 wrote: >> >> >> (sorry, dont know how i put my posting into an reply to an other issue >> before, >> new posting to sepearte it, big sorry) >> >> >> >> >> Hello list, >> >> i updated on a gentoo system from libvirtd 2.5 to

Still not working with gcc5.2 rc On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 11:08 William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> wrote: > Trying 5.2-rc now, will report back after the test case is run. > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 07:23 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: >> > Does fedora have gcc5

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:15 PM Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte at datenkhaos.de> wrote: > > On 2020 Jan 02, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Error in getting drive hardware properties > Error in getting drive reading properties > Error in getting drive writing properties > __________________________________ > > Disc mode is listed as: CD-DA > ++ WARN: error in ioctl

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: > Commit 1dce6264045cd23e9c07574ed0bb31c7dce9354f introduced a regression spotted > on several G94 (FDObz #85160). This device seems to expect the vblank period to I believe that's often done as a Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/bla annotation > be set after setting scale instead of before.

(sorry, dont know how i put my posting into an reply to an other issue before, new posting to sepearte it, big sorry) Hello list, i updated on a gentoo system from libvirtd 2.5 to 3.1.0 Now my windows machines cant access internet. I did a virbr1 with virt-manager and route it to the eth0, works fine on 2.5 Hello list, i updated on a gentoo system from libvirtd 2.5 to 3.1.0 Now my

As of the latest updates to anaconda and grub2 for Fedora 18, it is now possible to install with /boot as a btrfs subvolume. The way that grub2 is handling this is the "reach down" to the files it needs as if the subvolume was a directory. Is this OK? At this point I am not worried about snapshots or any other complexities. If the subvolume name is known. should grub2 be able to