similar to: virsh: cannot start domain with channel device,

I have two domain controllers running ubuntu (12.04 and 13.10) both with samba (4.1.6 and 4.1.7) installed and running (and with sssd on both machines to retrieve uid/gid from AD). I wish to set a share on ubuntu2 in the way so it could be accessible only from ubuntu1 (and by any user from ubuntu1, for instance by local root). I have found this solution though I'm not sure it solves my issue:

Thanks again Keith. I disabled UFW and flushed iptables completely, but same result. Pings from the external node are reaching the internal node on the tinc0 interface but nothing happens after that. Now that I'm thinking of it, I did some masquerading in order to get OpenVPN to work on another box, I wonder if that would be applicable here? Very Respectfully, Kismet Agbasi

Thanks Keith. Here's the output: root at ubuntu2:~# iptables -vnL FORWARD Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 745 packets, 47680 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 6299 416K ufw-before-logging-forward all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 6299 416K ufw-before-forward all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0

I''ve gone over the documentation several times now and I can''t figure out how to ''apply'' a manifest to a client. The client does have a signed certificate but the only thing in the /etc/puppet folder on the client is an ssl directory. I have a manifest that works fine on the puppet ''master'' I have added the client into

CentOS 6.3, x86_64. I have noticed when building a new software RAID-6 array on CentOS 6.3 that the mismatch_cnt grows monotonically while the array is building: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md11 : active raid6 sdg[5] sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0] 3904890880 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]

Keith, Thanks for the reply and the pointers. > Did you remember to activate kernel ip forwarding? > i.e. echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward ? I actually forgot to do this, but I have enabled it now in /etc/systctl.conf and can confirm now after a reboot that it's enabled. Unfortunately, still can't ping the node on the LAN. > and when I saw that I was about to cancel

Here is the previous email that I sent directly to Charles Lepple. ?I am now sending to the correct email with cc to Charles. ---------------- I am looking at, and trying to understand the rest of the conf files. ?But first want to askabout something from this message:[CODE]root at debian:/home/john# upsdrvctl startNetwork UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.7.2Network UPS Tools - Megatec/Q1

Attempting to take snapshots of VM using virsh with the following command, # virsh -c qemu:///system snapshot-create CentOS6-x86-001 Results in the following error, error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'savevm': The command savevm has not been found The VM's virtual disks are qcow2. Below is the XML file for this vm ------------ <domain type='kvm'

Attempting to take snapshots of VM using virsh with the following command, # virsh -c qemu:///system snapshot-create CentOS6-x86-001 Results in the following error, error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'savevm': The command savevm has not been found The VM's virtual disks are qcow2. Below is the XML file for this vm ------------ <domain type='kvm'

Turns out I needed to masquerade the traffic coming into that INSIDE node. Since I use UFW to manage IPtables, adding this to my /etc/ufw/before.rules and restarting UFW fixed it for me: " -A POSTROUTING -s 10.9.0.0/24 -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE" Very Respectfully, Kismet-Gerald Agbasi IT/Systems Administrator Central Truck Center, Inc. Office: 240-487-3315 Toll Free: 1-800-492-0709

I have a very strange issue that has plagued our KVM-based hypervisor infrastructure. Environment: - All EL7-based libvirt releases since EL7.0 - Fully patched EL7-based KVM guest on a fully patched EL7-based KVM host. - Secondary disk attached via 'virsh attach-device guest /vm/guest-with-secondary-disk-01/disk2.xml --persistent' (note --persistent flag here) Problem Description: -

Moving to libvirt-users where it belongs. On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 06:47 +0000, Tal Attaly wrote: > Hi, > I have bridge type interface defined with slot 3 - > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> > but after running virsh domxml-to-native qemu-argv I get slot 2- > -netdev tap,fd=21,id=hostnet0 -device

On 08/12/2015 02:34 PM, Alex Holst wrote: > I would really appreciate some pointers on what I am doing wrong here. > > I have a need to run multiple virtual guests which have each their own GPU and > some USB controllers passed-through. I am able to run one of the guests like > this (assuming vfio stuff has happened elsewhere), but I would prefer to use > virsh: > > kvm -M

I am trying to work my way up the learning curve through a forest of conflicting and mostly non-working examples and help pages spread about the internet. I have had no trouble getting a basic vm to build and to then start it up. But I have utterly failed to gain access to the machine. The only host I have available that can run it is a remote server. I have not got the networking side working

On 11/30/2015 07:30 PM, Sundar Nadathur wrote: > Hello all, > > I find this curious behavior that libvirt will automatically insert a USB > controller and a memballoon virtio driver into the domain?s XML, when > defineXML is called. IOW, the original XML did not have these 2 devices but > they are present right after defineXML is called. Why should libvirt add a USB >

Hello all, I find this curious behavior that libvirt will automatically insert a USB controller and a memballoon virtio driver into the domain's XML, when defineXML is called. IOW, the original XML did not have these 2 devices but they are present right after defineXML is called. Why should libvirt add a USB controller? DETAILS: Here is a little Python snippet to show that behavior:

I have a 4 Node Tinc VPN setup with 2 nodes on my LAN and the other 2 outside the LAN in the cloud. Everything has been working great for about 5 years now, until today when I decided to move one of the nodes to another box. I basically, copied over the /etc/tinc folder to the new server and also moved the /etc/network/interfaces file, so that the new server was an exact mirror (more or less).

So I have Need For Speed Porsche Unleased and I have ubuntu 6.06 LTS and I have wine 0.9.90-ubuntu2 which I installed using the package manager . So I simply use wine and I get to play NFS on ubuntu simple right. I install NFS and everything goes fine. I then go to wincfg and add NFS and change it to run in 98. Error one I run the shortcut on my desktop in a terminal and I get this

I would really appreciate some pointers on what I am doing wrong here. I have a need to run multiple virtual guests which have each their own GPU and some USB controllers passed-through. I am able to run one of the guests like this (assuming vfio stuff has happened elsewhere), but I would prefer to use virsh: kvm -M q35 -m 8192 -cpu host,kvm=off \ -smp 4,sockets=1,cores=4,threads=1 \ -bios

This kind of behavior (on demand live streaming) is not supported by either oddcast or icecast2, and honestly, really shouldn't be...In your situation, I'd consider doing something closer to what live365 did back in the day to address this particular issue, which is store all their content locally on their servers, and basically build playlists that are customed for each user. I