similar to: Rejecting valid mail (including this mailing list)

Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',

Dear All, its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help i have been running a mil server with sendmail and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl. i had other servers which are alredy out now that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already been out of my sendmail config. any one knows of ny other servers i could add in my sendmail config apprecite ur help

Dear Friend, I done configuration using RBLSMTPD with WHITELIST, but I don't know it is correct. Please check files below are corrects. Thanks Adriano === FILE WHITELIST.DOMINIO.RBL. ==== $ttl 900 whitelist.dominio.rbl. IN SOA host1.xxxxxx.com. root.xxxxx.com. ( 2006112002 ; serial; 3600 ; refresh period (1 hora); 900 ; retry time (15 minutos); 1800 ; expire tiem (30 minutos); 900 ;

I have a problem getting spamd and sendmail (both stock CentOS4 rpms) to work together on a couple of smtp relay machines. This is clearly a configuration issue and no doubt revolves around my lack of comprehension of how this is to work. Basically, the setup consists of two frontend public smtp transports that redirect all email through a firewall to an internal imap server for final

Someone got ahold of my information (actually, I know who they are - t2net.net - just not how to get back at them) and now I'm getting 4 phone calls a week upwards of 20 spams a day. I'm trying to put an end to the spam at least and the built-in stuff for Evolution isn't working as well as it should I did some Googling on procmail and fetchmail and spamassassin config files and much

All of a sudden I am getting this error this morning. -------------------------------------- <<< 553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see: http://ordb.org/lookup/?host=mp;{client_addr} 501 5.6.0 Data format error Content-Type: message/delivery-status Action: failed Status: 5.3.0 Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see: http://ordb.org/lookup/?host=mp;{client_addr} Last-Attempt-Date: Thu,

Hello to all members. I am using Dovecot for 5 years, but this is my first post here. I am aware of the various autoresponder scripts for vacation autoreplies (I am using Virtual Vacation 3.1 by Mischa Peters). I have an issue with auto-replies - it is vulnerable to spamming with forged email address. Forging can be prevented with several Postfix settings, which I did in the past - but was forced

Hi everybody, I am trying to work with quota. I use postfix and dovecot with a sql backend. Below you'll find my configuration. Everything works except for the quota part. It doesn't seem to see the quota and doesn't respond to the sender that the client is over its quota. versions: postfix-2.5.20070531-mysql dovecot-1.0.2-mysql Thanks for the help in advance. My Settings: #

Running CentOS 4.2 with all updates. I've been using sendmail for my MTA since forever. I've grown used to it and I can make it do what I want it to. However (there's always a catch, isn't there)... Lately it seems that some mail is being lost. I've noticed some instances when a message was sent to myself and others which I will only see if someone replies back to

Hello, I'm trying to configure sieve plugin on my mail server so that people can do mail filtering (and mostly vacation notification) on their account. The mail server is running fine since 5 years and is based on :- sendmail- dovecot- roundcube It serves 2 differents domains. I've recently installed pigeonhole for fc17, and managed to configure managesieve plugin in roundcube

I know this is a "generic" question, but fully CentOS related. I attempted to set up i386 v.4.1 on my primary computer at the co-located site, and thought I had everything squared away till I discovered the machine was refusing mail connections. AFIK, I had no firewall or other objects blocking port 25. It has been my experience that with most arch's and versions where sendmail is

Currently, we have two mail relays for inbound messages, and a third for POP. The inbound messages go thru all the CPU-intensive anti-spam stuff, and then they relay it to the POP server for pickup. Currently, one of these is the "primary", and the other is "secondary", and I'd like them to be considered more or less as equals, since the "primary" system is

On 11/04/2019 14:33, Anton Dollmaier via dovecot wrote: >> Which is why a dnsbl for dovecot is a good idea. I do not believe the >> agents behind these login attempts are only targeting me, hence the >> addresses should be shared via a dnsbl. > > Probably there's an existing solution for both problems (subsequent > attempts and dnsbl): > >>

On 11/04/2019 11:43, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote: > A. With the fail2ban solution > - you 'solve' that the current ip is not able to access you It is only a solution if there are subsequent attempts from the same address. I currently have several thousand addresses blocked due to dovecot login failures. My firewall is set to log these so I can see that few repeat, those

I am used to sendmail and am using Postfix now and am uncertain of some features. I typically would comment out the line in sendmail.mc that went something like 'accept unresolvable domains' I tried using smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unverified_sender reject_unverified_smtp and this seems a bit too restrictive and got some bounces on legitimate senders so I'm

Hi all, Just out of curiosity: is there anything we can do, on the samba side, to counter the recent ransomware attacks? (or limit the damage done) I'm thinking like: limit the number of files per second a client (workstation) is allowed to edit, or some other smart tricks..? It would be nice if samba could be an extra layer of defense. Something perhaps a vfs module could help with..?

Don't know if this might be hardware or software related, but it seems that every time I attempt to do a remote reboot of the machine, everything shuts down normally, and it never comes back. Just returned from the co-lo site, and when I plugged the monitor in, it had gone to the point of "rebooting" and hung. This is 4.3 on x-86. Sam -- Sam W.Drinkard -- sam at wa4phy.net

Hi list, I have noted over the last week or so my DNS servers are dumping lots of messages for bogus domain lookups. Examining the postfix queue with postqueue -p: I see many (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com type=MX: Host not found, try again) Jake at bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com My question - why does this

On 12/04/2019 08:24, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > Weakforced uses Lua so you can easily integrate DNSBL support into it. How does this help Dovecot block? A link to some documentation or example perhaps? > We will not add DNSBL support to dovecot at this time. Is there a reason why you will not support this RFE?

On 04/27/15 11:08 AM, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:46:30PM +0100, Jorge Bastos wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Some extra help. >> >> How would I make hotmail accept my emails and not make them go to junk >> folder? >> >> Is there any trick to do this? > This isn't really a dovecot issue, but you can start with