similar to: IPv6 nwfilter

Hi, Libvirt's nwfilter ships a number of useful filter scripts by default, but none to handle IPv6 traffic. Is there a particular reason for that, or is that just because nobody has got around to that yet? One interesting thing about dealing with IPv6 traffic is that hosts often have several auto-configured addresses, usually at least one auto-configured link- local address under

On 05/27/2014 02:46 AM, Brian Rak wrote: > Make sure you have: > > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 That doesn't make sense. bridge-nf-call-iptables controls whether or not traffic going across a Linux host bridge device will be sent through iptables, but the rules created by nwfilter are applied to the "vnetX" tap devices that connect the guest to the

Looking at https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/virtualization_deployment_and_administration_guide/sect-virtual_networking-applying_network_filtering#sect-Applying_network_filtering-Usage_of_variables_in_filters, it sounds like the preferred approach is to use something like: <filter name='no-ipv6-spoofing' chain='ipv6-ip'

Hello, I have a nwfilter that I'm using to ensure that libvirt domains can't spoof IPv6 traffic. It looks like this: <filter name='no-ipv6-spoofing' chain='ipv6-ip' priority='-710'> <rule action='return' direction='out' priority='500'> <ipv6 srcipaddr='$IPV6' srcipmask='$IPV6MASK'/> </rule>

On 5/28/2014 10:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 05/27/2014 02:46 AM, Brian Rak wrote: >> Make sure you have: >> >> /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 > That doesn't make sense. bridge-nf-call-iptables controls whether or not > traffic going across a Linux host bridge device will be sent through > iptables, but the rules created by nwfilter are applied

Let's say I have some iptables rules defined to restrict guest traffic. If I restart the hosts firewall 'service iptables restart', all the guest-specific rules get blown away. Is there a way to reapply all the guest firewall rules, without restarting each individual guest? It looks like if I edit a nwfilter with `virsh nwfilter-edit` it goes and reapplies the rules to all the

On 03/30/2018 04:29 PM, Andre Goree wrote: > On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrang? wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >>> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply >>> nwfilter rules >>> at runtime?? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >>> nwfilter to >>> the VM

[Please keep the list CC-ed as it may help somebody from future when searching for solution to the same problem] On 5/6/19 6:08 PM, nakata@geekpit.org wrote: > Am 2019-05-06 16:26, schrieb Michal Privoznik: >> On 5/6/19 3:44 PM, nakata@geekpit.org wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i want to disable the nwfilter functionality of libvirt. >>> It's surely nice

On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter >> rules >> at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >> nwfilter to >> the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've

On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter >> rules >> at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >> nwfilter to >> the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: > I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter rules > at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a nwfilter to > the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've not > come across a way to do so, but I thought I'd ask here before I chase my

Hi, I contact you as i have difficulties to use nwfilter with KVM host. I want to implemente flow filtering between my Linux guests. I created the following filter : cat admin-dmz-internet.xml <filter name='admin-dmz-internet'> <!-- this zone is an SSH ingoing only zone --> <!-- but SSH can go to an other SSH proxy --> <filterref

Hi All, I have two kvm guests running with a bridged configuration bound separately to br0 and br1 on my Fedora 15 host. I'm attempting to create some nwfilter rules on br1 and am running into a bunch of problems that have me scratching my head. libvirt version: 0.8.8-7 What I've noticed on the second host is as follows: - Most all nwfilter rules that I create for the host on br1

I'm trying to apply a nwfilter rule for two networks on the same guest interface, like so: ~ # virsh nwfilter-dumpxml 1081532-private-both <filter name='1081532-private-both' chain='root'> <uuid>16004b94-2b62-4568-9467-169908eb4040</uuid> <rule action='accept' direction='in' priority='500'> <ip

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am running a webserver on the libvirt host and would like to add a > nwfilter such that a VM can access that server. The corresponding iptables > rule would look like this: > > iptables --append INPUT --in-interface virbr0 --destination 192.168.122.1 > --protocol tcp --dport 80

Hi, i want to disable the nwfilter functionality of libvirt. It's surely nice for some people, nevertheless i don't want libvirt to alter any netfilter rules, neither i want the according functionality even available. I know about nwfilter-undefine, but what i'm looking for is an option to globally disable this functionality at all. Some config flag or similar. How can i achieve

Hi, I am running a webserver on the libvirt host and would like to add a nwfilter such that a VM can access that server. The corresponding iptables rule would look like this: iptables --append INPUT --in-interface virbr0 --destination 192.168.122.1 --protocol tcp --dport 80 --jump ACCEPT where the network is using virbr0 and sits at 192.168.122.1. I don't want to hardcode the host IP

On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 08:09:49PM -0400, Dan wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am running a webserver on the libvirt host and would like to add a > > nwfilter such that a VM can access that server. The corresponding iptables > > rule would look like this: > > > > iptables

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:30:46AM -0400, Nicolas Bock wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:35:19PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 08:09:49PM -0400, Dan wrote: > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am running a webserver

Hi, Over the past few days I've been trying to get a prototype working of a stateful firewall for a Virtual Machine using Libvirt's network filters. My goal is to replace the current custom Python/Java code in the Apache CloudStack [0] project by Network Filters of Libvirt. Both IPv4 and IPv6 should work, but I started off with IPv4 and I have issues with accepting back