Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Error when building from source"
2016 Apr 24
2
IBM 5396-1Kx ups nearly recognised.
On 17/04/2016 21:49, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Andy R - (NUT-List)
> <spinner+NUTlist at delphinidae.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like you were right. I've tried building both the patch
>> against the stable 2.7.4 source and using the latest source tarball
>> you've just created. The builds both went fine and seem to run as
2017 Apr 19
4
R 3.4 has broken C++11 support
Hi Dirk and Martyn,
> That looks fine. Can you please give a reproducible example of a package
> that compiles correctly on R 3.3.3 but not with R 3.4.0 or R-devel.
here you go, it?s pretty much the simplest package possible that needs C++11:
https://github.com/flying-sheep/cxx11test
> Maybe you can share with us how you configure the build of R-devel?
Sure, in the mail you quoted, I
2017 Apr 19
5
R 3.4 has broken C++11 support
Hi!
Well, my linux distribution has very recent versions
of everything, so a working C++11 compiler exists:
$ gcc --version | head -n1
gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20170306
Could wrong ./configure options be at fault here? See:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=r-devel#n40
My sessionInfo():
$ R-devel --slave -e 'sessionInfo()' | head -n3
R Under development (unstable)
2014 Aug 11
4
Re: issue when building/making package from git
> You can avoid testing gnulib (not very interesting anyway) by running:
>
> ./configure --disable-gnulib-tests
I personaly do not care, but in case i make a libguestfs-git PKBUILD,
I want everything be OK.
I just realised than I followed the libguestfs PKGBUILD, but NO
virt-p2v and virt-v2v binaries are installed in /usr/bin.
Shame. I am rewriting the git PKGBUILD.
2014 Aug 11
3
Re: issue when building/making package from git
Patch applied.
-------
==> Creating package "libguestfs-git"...
-> Generating .PKGINFO file...
-> Generating .MTREE file...
-> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: libguestfs-git 1.27.25.12.gbbae613-1 (Mon Aug 11
18:24:54 CEST 2014)
----------------------
martinus@gerbillous ➤➤ ~aur/libguestfs-git % ls -al
2013 Jul 02
2
LDFLAGS and distro overrides
This just came up on IRC,
15:01 < chithead> the first one that fails is ld -m elf_i386 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Bsymbolic -pie -E --hash-style=gnu -T /var/tmp/portage/sys-boot/syslinux-6.01_pre5/work/syslinux-6.01-pre5/core/i386/syslinux.ld -M -o ldlinux.elf ldlinux.o \
15:01 < chithead> --start-group libcom32.a --whole-archive
2016 Jun 08
0
IBM 5396-1Kx ups nearly recognised.
Hi Andy,
trying to catch my late here and there, keep in mind that my below comments
may be missing things...
2016-04-24 23:30 GMT+02:00 Andy R <spinner+NUTlist at delphinidae.org.uk>:
> On 17/04/2016 21:49, Charles Lepple wrote:
>
>> On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Andy R - (NUT-List)
>> <spinner+NUTlist at delphinidae.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>
2014 Aug 12
2
Re: issue when building/making package from git
> There's probably a dependency missing. Look closely at the
> ./configure output and the README file.
>
I have checked all packages in README and
libguestfs/appliance/packagelist. All are installed.
>
> You should test this first of all by building from source, and
> without installing,
I first run makepkg, so no install
>
> ./run guestfish -N fs -m /dev/sda1
2017 Apr 19
0
R 3.4 has broken C++11 support
Hi Philipp,
Fellow Archlinux user here. I think the problem is with the r-devel
PKGBUILD file, rather than anything wrong in R itself. The PKGBUILD
file does this:
ln -s /etc/R/${i} ${i}
when it should do
ln -s /etc/R-devel/${i} ${i}
You can fix your installed version with
cd /opt/r-devel/lib/R/etc/
sudo rm ./*
sudo ln -s /etc/R-devel/javaconf
sudo ln -s /etc/R-devel/ldpaths
sudo ln -s
2016 Apr 17
2
IBM 5396-1Kx ups nearly recognised.
On 17/04/2016 00:50, Charles Lepple wrote:
> [as this list does not set or alter the Reply-To header, please use "reply all". Thanks!]
>
>> On Apr 16, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Andy R - (NUT-List) wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently using the usbhid-ups driver but as the ups usb-ID isn't recognised in the udev rules I run it as root. Running usbhid-ups gives a "device
2019 Nov 21
2
Fail to build upstream libvirt on rhel8
Hello,
A compilation failure happened when I tried building libvirt latest code on
rhel8
Version:
gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64
libvirt v5.9.0-352-g5e939cea89
Steps:
1. Clone libvirt source code
2. Create build dir, and run autogen.sh
# cd libvirt
# mkdir build && cd build
# ../autogen.sh --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix=
2013 Sep 23
1
tar warnings in R-3.0.2 RC when R is installed by a different (non-root) user
Hi,
I created a package as follows:
> a = 1
> package.skeleton()
Then I got the following output when building the package:
* checking for file ?anRpackage/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* preparing ?anRpackage?:
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking for LF line-endings in source and make files
* checking for empty or unneeded directories
* looking to see if a ?data/datalist?
2015 Jan 17
0
[libvirt]configuration question about usinf for [xen4.5][libxl]
What configuration should be set in a custom compiled libvirt to get the most out of the xen libxl?
[ -f Makefile ] || ./configure --prefix=/usr --libexec=/usr/lib/"$pkgname" --sbindir=/usr/bin \ --with-storage-lvm=yes --with-udev=yes --without-hal --disable-static \ --with-init-script=systemd --with-systemctl=yes --with-systemd-daemon=yes \ --with-qemu-user=nobody
2017 Oct 03
2
Re: error: internal error: missing backend for pool type 11 (zfs)
@Michal: Thanks for your reply!
Indeed I have found a package in the AUR (libvirt-zfs) and only had to
change to the current version and add zfs-utils as dependency in the
PKGBUILD. Now I don't get the previous error anymore but I still cannot
setup a VM because I constantly get errors due to wrong permissions.
I have tried to change the permissions in:
- /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf
-
2014 Aug 12
3
Re: issue when building/making package from git
My current version is supermin 5.1.8-1
>
> If the tests *don't* run successfully, then you've most likely found a
> bug in supermin. That has to be fixed before continuing.
>
tests failed. See the log below.
==========================================
supermin 5.1.9: tests/test-suite.log
==========================================
# TOTAL: 8
# PASS: 5
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL:
2004 Apr 30
0
buildpkg.sh enhancements
I've made some changes to buildpkg.sh to make it easier for package
builders to add their local changes.
I'd like people that use buildpkg.sh to test and comment on these
changes before I commit them to CVS.
None of the defaults have changed.
Some of the patch is is just moving chunks of code to a different
location to make some of the enhancements work.
Some things you may find
2019 Nov 26
0
Re: Fail to build upstream libvirt on rhel8
On 11/21/19 3:18 AM, Han Han wrote:
> Hello,
> A compilation failure happened when I tried building libvirt latest code
> on rhel8
>
> Version:
> gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64
> libvirt v5.9.0-352-g5e939cea89
>
> Steps:
> 1. Clone libvirt source code
> 2. Create build dir, and run autogen.sh
> # cd libvirt
> # mkdir build && cd build
> # ../autogen.sh
2017 Apr 19
0
R 3.4 has broken C++11 support
On 19 April 2017 at 12:42, Angerer, Philipp via R-devel wrote:
| Well, my linux distribution has very recent versions
| of everything, so a working C++11 compiler exists:
|
| $ gcc --version | head -n1
| gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20170306
|
| Could wrong ./configure options be at fault here? See:
|
| https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=r-devel#n40
|
| My sessionInfo():
|
| $ R-devel
2017 Apr 19
0
R 3.4 has broken C++11 support
Hmm, doesn?t look like my R was configured incorrectly:
R is now configured for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Source directory: .
Installation directory: /opt/r-devel
C compiler: gcc -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
Fortran 77 compiler: gfortran -g -O2
Default C++ compiler: g++ -march=x86-64
2017 Apr 19
0
R 3.4 has broken C++11 support
On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 16:32 +0200, Angerer, Philipp wrote:
> Hi Dirk and Martyn,
>
> > That looks fine. Can you please give a reproducible example of a
> > package
> > that compiles correctly on R 3.3.3 but not with R 3.4.0 or R-devel.
>
> here you go, it?s pretty much the simplest package possible that
> needs C++11:
>
>