similar to: event-test.py cannot detects domain shutdown

2014년 2월 11일 오후 10:00에 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> 작성: On 02/11/2014 12:20 AM, Kim Larry wrote: libvirtd version is 1.1.4 and using Xen for hypervisor. I'm not as familiar with the xen hypervisor as with qemu; it may just be the case that no one has coded the xen driver to send a shutdown event. At any rate, I can confirm that with the qemu driver, shutdown events are delivered. It

On 02/18/2014 05:12 AM, Kim Larry wrote: > 2014년 2월 11일 오후 10:00에 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> 작성: > >> On 02/11/2014 12:20 AM, Kim Larry wrote: >> >>>>> libvirtd version is 1.1.4 and using Xen for hypervisor. >>>> I'm not as familiar with the xen hypervisor as with qemu; it may just be >>>> the case that no one has coded the

On 02/18/2014 10:45 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Cole Robinson wrote: >> On 02/18/2014 05:12 AM, Kim Larry wrote: >> >>> The thing I found today is that if libvirt uses xend driver, shutdown events >>> are delivered, but if libvirt uses libxl drvier, doesn't show up anything. It >>> seems there are bugs on shutdown event, so I did dig into the libvirt

Cole Robinson wrote: > On 02/18/2014 05:12 AM, Kim Larry wrote: > >> The thing I found today is that if libvirt uses xend driver, shutdown events >> are delivered, but if libvirt uses libxl drvier, doesn't show up anything. It >> seems there are bugs on shutdown event, so I did dig into the libvirt source >> briefly, but I couldn't find where libxl driver

Cole Robinson wrote: > On 02/18/2014 10:45 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> Cole Robinson wrote: >> >>> On 02/18/2014 05:12 AM, Kim Larry wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The thing I found today is that if libvirt uses xend driver, shutdown events >>>> are delivered, but if libvirt uses libxl drvier, doesn't show up anything.

Hi LLVMers, The root of my SRC_DIR is: /home/hb/projects/src/llvm-1/llvm/ and the root of my OBJ_DIR is: /home/hb/projects/build/FC1/llvm-1-1. However, the configure script seems to have stripped some of the / from the paths: Makefile.common:63: /home/hb/projects/buildFC1llvm-1-1/Makefile.config: No such file or directory Makefile.common:69: /home/hb/projects/srcllvm-1/Makefile.rules: No such

On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 10:32 +0200, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > The root of my SRC_DIR is: /home/hb/projects/src/llvm-1/llvm/ > and the root of my OBJ_DIR is: /home/hb/projects/build/FC1/llvm-1-1. > > However, the configure script seems to have stripped some of the / from the > paths: > Makefile.common:63: /home/hb/projects/buildFC1llvm-1-1/Makefile.config: No

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:12:42AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So I was now thinking of hashing the lock pointer; let me go and quickly > put something together. A little something like so; ideally we'd allocate the hashtable since NR_CPUS is kinda bloated, but it shows the idea I think. And while this has loops in (the rehashing thing) their fwd progress does not depend on other

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:12:42AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So I was now thinking of hashing the lock pointer; let me go and quickly > put something together. A little something like so; ideally we'd allocate the hashtable since NR_CPUS is kinda bloated, but it shows the idea I think. And while this has loops in (the rehashing thing) their fwd progress does not depend on other

smbclient (and smbtar) in version 2.2.7a (and prior) has problems with large files (> 4GB). The following patch (against 2.2.7a) fixes all known problems with this. This code has been checked into the CVS tree in all branches as well. -- ====================================================================== Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics Networking Engineer

On 1/24/20 4:34 PM, Guy Godfroy wrote: > I don't really understand what new hook this would be. Libvirt's migration happens in phases [1]. The last one is 'Confirm' where either the domain is either killed (because it's running on the destination successfully), or resumed (because there was an error). If you make a lock shared at the beginning of the migration, but

Hi guys, I ran into a problem of not being able to create unique labels when creating a factor. Consider an example below: hb <- factor(c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3), levels=c(1,2,3),labels=c(1,1,2)) > hb [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Levels: 1 1 2 > unique(hb) [1] 1 1 2 Levels: 1 1 2 How come there are three unique levels, I thought this would only create one unique level? >

Hi, Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the attached results. Summarized as follows: # of expected passes 1081 # of unexpected failures 26 # of expected failures 32 I configured llvm with following options: '--prefix=/home/hb/llvm/ --enable-targets=host-only'. I used gcc version 3.4.2 to build the tools and cfe. The cfe is version:

On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:55:44PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h > @@ -0,0 +1,321 @@ > +#ifndef _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH > +#error "do not include this file" > +#endif > + > +/* > + * Implement paravirt qspinlocks; the general idea is to halt the vcpus instead > + * of spinning them. > + * > + * This relies on the

On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:55:44PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h > @@ -0,0 +1,321 @@ > +#ifndef _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH > +#error "do not include this file" > +#endif > + > +/* > + * Implement paravirt qspinlocks; the general idea is to halt the vcpus instead > + * of spinning them. > + * > + * This relies on the

Hi Henrik, You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update from CVS to get the fix for the 2005-06-15-ExpandGotoInternalProblem.c test. Note the date of the test (5 days ago). Reid. On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:42 +0200, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the > attached results.

Hi Reid, Now, I've removed the file and updated the source tree with this command: cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:/var/cvs/llvm update -PdR llvm However, the file still exits. Henrik. >From: Reid Spencer >Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:57:54 -0700 > >Hi Henrik, > >You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update >from CVS to get

r-help-es@r-project.org Hola!! Estoy trabajando con una función del tipo h(x)''B, donde h(x) es un vector columna de q entradas, de igual manera B es un vector columna de dimensión q. Quiero graficar h(x)''B para alguna h(x), por ejemplo h<-function(x) matrix(c(1,x,x^2,x^3), ncol=1) B es un vector columna fijo B=matrix(c(1,2,1,3),ncol=1) Para graficar la función

Dear list, i'm trying to test if a linear combination of coefficients of glm is equal to 0. For example : class 'cl' has 3 levels (1,2,3) and 'y' is a response variable. We want to test H0: mu1 + mu2 - mu3 =0 where mu1,mu2, and mu3 are the means for each level. for me, the question is how to get the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters from glm. but perhaps there

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:20:30PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > After more careful reading, I think the assumption that the presence of an > unused bucket means there is no match is not true. Consider the scenario: > > 1. cpu 0 puts lock1 into hb[0] > 2. cpu 1 puts lock2 into hb[1] > 3. cpu 2 clears hb[0] > 4. cpu 3 looks for lock2 and doesn't find it Hmm, yes. The only