similar to: Libvirt-LXC + systemd + user namespace

On 28.01.2014 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote: >> Hi there! >> >> I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the >> config: >> >> >> >> <idmap> >> >> <uid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> >>

Hi, I want to switch from our Windows NT server ( which works as our PDC ) to Linux - Samba. Could you advice a step-by-step guide about this process, or is that possible, at all? Can I use Samba as a BDC, convert the user DB and than promote it to PDC? Thanks in advance! Regards; Istvan

Hi there! I'm building libvirt-1.1.4 on Tizen. I had to modify the spec file: 1. Comment out requirements: xhtml1, scrub, shadow-utils 2. Added defines: %define _without_selinux 1 %define _without_hal 1 %define _without_libnl 1 %define _without_macvtap 1 %define _without_storage_fs 1 %define _without_network 1 %define _without_sasl 1 %define _without_qemu 1 %define

Hi there, I'm interested in using libvirt-lxc on armv7l architecture and I have a hard time building libvirt. 1. Are there any prebuild rpms for ARM? 2. I have many dependency issues during build: error: *** Error Summary *** === the following packages failed to build due to missing build dependencies === libvirt: nothing provides hal-devel nothing provides

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:46:39AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/05/2013 09:18 AM, Jan Olszak wrote: > > Hi there! > > > > I'm building libvirt-1.1.4 on Tizen. I had to modify the spec file: > > > > 1. Comment out requirements: xhtml1, scrub, shadow-utils > > Why? Are these prerequisites not available for you? Tizen is lacking loads of stuff

Hi there! Does anyone have a config file for libvirt-LXC, that makes it possible to: 1. Use all namespaces (user namespace in particular) 2. Run systemd inside a container. Thanks! Jan

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote: > Hi there! > > I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the > config: > > > > <idmap> > > <uid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> > > <gid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> > >

Oh, sorry. I try to build libvirt on Tizen, with gbs. Unfortunately Tizen doesn't have the packages from the "snip list of rpms":) I tried to install dependencies from http://ftp.pbone.net/pub/fedora/linux/development/20/armhfp/os/Packages/ but that just doesn't work... Thanks! Jan -----Original Message----- From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berrange@redhat.com] Sent:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi lxc folks, the symptom my libvirt LXC container suffers from is: root@depot:/dev/net# ls -la total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Jun 29 16:26 . drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 480 Jun 29 16:26 .. root@depot:/dev/net# mknod tun c 10 200 mknod: `tun': Operation not permitted The host is an up-to-date AMD64 Ubuntu raring on 3.8.0-25-generic that was

Hi there! 1. Is it possible to build libvirt-lxc driver without building libvirt? How do I do it? 2. Do I understand it correctly, that I can use libvirt-lxc as a substitute of lxc? Thanks, Jan

Hi there! Can libvirtd (lxc driver) run as a non-root user, but with the right CAPs? Thanks, Jan

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 10:48, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:45:03AM +0100, Peter Crowther wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 10:40, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > Is there any problem running libvirtd as root? > > > > > > Yes, in the regulated environment in which I

I have created a LXC container with debootstrap followed by virt-install like this: host=mylxc1 debootstrap wheezy /home/lxc/$host virt-install -c lxc:// -n $host --filesystem /home/lxc/$host,/ --ram 1024 I am confused about the /dev filesystem in this container. Specifically the device '/dev/tty'. >From inside the container: ~# ls -la /dev/tty ls: cannot access /dev/tty: No such

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, On 07/08/2013 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> the symptom my libvirt LXC container suffers from is: >> root@depot:/dev/net# ls -la total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 >> Jun 29 16:26 . drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 480 Jun 29 16:26 .. >> root@depot:/dev/net# mknod tun c 10 200 mknod: `tun': Operation >>

Good afternoon I would like to ask if is possible somehow give more relevance to the recent documents in search results. I dont want to sort results according to the date, I still prefer relevance, but I would like to see recent documents with better scoring. I was trying to add search query using AND_MAYBE, which should use relevance from both subqueries, but it didnt add any benefit to the

This patch adds the ability to kinit to allow the dropping of POSIX capabilities. kinit is modified by this change, such that it understands the new kernel command line "drop_capabilities=" that specifies a comma separated list of capability names that should be dropped before switching over to the next init in the boot strap (typically on the root disk). When processing capabilities

Hi. I need to use /dev/ppp inside the lxc container, for very ancient software. Problem solved this way: 1) virsh edit container name and add section: <features> <capabilities policy='default'> <mknod state='on'/> </capabilities> </features> 2) start container 3) attach or ssh container, be root: #mknod /dev/ppp c 108 0 4) inside

I am working on my thesis in which i have couple of independent variables that are categorical in nature and the depndent variable is dichotomus. Initially I run univariate analysis and added the variables with significant p-values (p<0.25) in my full model. I have three confusions. Firstly, I am looking for confounding variables by using formula "(crude beta-cofficient - adjusted

This patchset applies to klibc mainline. As is it will probably collide with Maximilian's recent patch to rename run-init to switch_root posted last week. To boot an untrusted environment with certain capabilities locked out, we'd like to be able to drop the capabilities up front from early userspace, before we actually transition onto the root volume. This patchset implements this by

On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:07:37 +0100 Vegard Vesterheim <vegard.vesterheim at uninett.no> wrote: > # mknod -m 666 /dev/tty c 4 0 > mknod: `/dev/tty': Operation not permitted In the manual for the LXC driver this part of my question is answered: "The container init process will be started with CAP_MKNOD capability removed and blocked from re-acquiring it. As such it will