similar to: /etc/resolv.conf changes

Hello all, I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for my lab. Brief configuration: Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network) 1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the above network to our corporate domain (no firewalls between our 192.168.16.x network and the corporate network. The domain

Hi, I am facing issue stoping NetworkManager to update resolv.cfg, I am using below configuration for eth0 interface: TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy NAME=eth0 UUID=93b90a46-dab5-4a67-8fd0-fefe8874a8b9 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=no PEERDNS=no PEERROUTES=yes

On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >> >> unbound running on localhost. >> >> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >> the localhost for name resolution - whenever NetworkManager gets >> restarted (usually only a system boot) it

CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. unbound running on localhost. Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using the localhost for name resolution - whenever NetworkManager gets restarted (usually only a system boot) it gets over-written. It seems every distro has a different way of preventing NetworkManager from replacing that file. I found instructions for Fedora that

> On 11/17/18 8:31 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >>>> >>>> unbound running on localhost. >>>> >>>> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >>>> the

given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and probably still present on C6.7) only 1 interface, there is dhcp on this network (for kickstarting) but the machines have static ip's, and NO networkmanager installed contents of resolv.conf search some.domain.here nameserver x.x.x.x #dns1 nameserver y.y.y.y #dns2 change resolv.conf to: search some.newdomain.here nameserver

Hi all, I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down how often, but I think it's on the hour, or something. This is the conents of the file right now: # Generated by NetworkManager # No nameservers found; try putting DNS servers into

Every now and again the nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf on my CentOS-6.5 server are commented out. I used to think this was the fault of NetworkManager, but I've stopped running that on the server (using the network service instead) and the nameserver removal still occurs. I'm baffled by the motivation for this, as I can't think of any situation where it would be of advantage to have

Hello, I changed ISPs and need to update name servers in resolv.conf. I have tried nano, gedit, Webmin, system-config-network and it won't allow me to make the changes. I have Network Manager turned off and when I enable it , eth0 and eth1 have no entries. I enabled it, added the connections, but still no changes. I'm stuck TIA

Hi all, I find that in my CentOS, which is installed in vmware, I can use yum to install software from Internet, and I can also ping websites, but I cannot download stuff using wget. I receive error msg unable to resolve host address ?xxxxx?. The IP address is 192.168.80.128, and this is the content of /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager domain localdomain search localdomain nameserver

Hello, Am running Bind 9 in Cent OS 5.1. I have a DNS server, that: - DNS server to hosts in lab.company.com - 192.168.17.x - forwards query to company.com - 10.100.x.x. Problem: 1. FQDN and by-IP-address ping and nslookup is successful. 2. ping/nslookup by host-name-only --- from any 192.168.17.x hosts to any 10.100.x.x hosts fail and vice versa. I have setup the DNS of lab.company.com

Hello list - http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90035/how-to-set-dns-resolver-in-fedora-using-network-manager That says it works for CentOS 5 and I *suspect* the methods there (3 listed) would work, but what is the best way with NetworkManager to set it up to use the localhost for DNS ? I'm paranoid about DNS spoofing and really prefer to have a local instance of DNSSEC enforcing

Le 18/02/2020 ? 12:28, Anand Buddhdev a ?crit?: > Neither. The DNS configuration should not normally be bound to a > specific interface, so don't configure it with any interface. If you do, > and that interface goes down, your DNS config also disappears. I would like to do that very much, only NetworkManager makes you jump through burning loops to do so. With network-scripts, it

Thank you, Louis, for your reply. By simply asking me to provide outputs of the aforementioned files, I found the cause of my first problem (auth failing). It was my /etc/hosts file on dc1. All of them should look like this, and indeed DC2 and DC3's *did* look like this: # cat /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 ? ? ? localhost.samdom.mycompany.net ?localhost > 192.168.3.201

Hello, On my systems I have after update to last centos 1810 a big Problem with the network?? Om my system I have three NIC two are connected from hardware (hostdev) the last is connected from the bridge on the host. (NetworkManager was disabled) Now after the update the client can't start the NIC's correctly :-( My Problem is the bridged NIC ethX I must Install and activate the

My machine has a static IP, with dhcp and IPv6 disabled. Every time I reboot, some process rewrites /etc/resolv.conf, including a comment about dhcpclient. The only package I have installed that shows up in "rpm -qa|grep -i dhcp" is dhcpv6-client-1.0.10-16.el5, and nothing in there is named dhcpclient. I'd like to figure out what software is rewriting this file and why. man 5

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on all my servers, in three different contexts : 1. simple local server 2. public facing server 3. router/gateway/firewall I'm currently in the process of moving my KISS-style network-scripts-style configurations to something more orthodox based on NetworkManager. Scenarios (1) and (2) caused no problems, but (3) is giving me some headache. Let me

NetworkManager used to work fine for me but during the last few installations its a big hurdle in the wireless connectivity. I'm using Madwifi and its interface is correctly listed and working but I cannot connect to any wifi AP without NetworkManager. I've two interfaces: eth0 and wifi0. Starting NetworkManager doesn't show any notification icon in the top right in gnome and I believe

Hai, And Omg... Your right, its my fault. :-/ I didnt say to you, you needed make the changes, to change what Rowland showed. Im really sorry.. ;-) when im in austria i'll buy you a beer. Or if you want teach you snowboarding.. I have an other guy in austria that cant ski/board. Im going to teach him also. .. So funny a dutch guy teaching to austria guys.. :-) And how is it running

On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 >> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >> echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf > > Oh okay, you really do want to back away from Redhat entirely. That's