similar to: libvirt networking using VLAN Tag basics

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

Greetings all, I've setup a new gretap device as per Herbert Xu's new patches and it works as expected for smaller MTU. I'm wondering if gretap tunnels handle fragmentation at all or if this might be a bridge related issue. The same setup works quite well if I use vtun with a tap device however, so while this isn't entirely bridge-related, Maybe someone here might have

Hi all, I am trying to setup a configuration of Tinc to allow multiple tincd daemons for a same network (mixing bonding, etc...). I will post my solution later if I found one. This is to get better speeds in multiple gigabit/sec networks. So my question is not about this directly. I would like to know if the "netname" configured on each node, is used somewhere in communications

Dear all, i have a query about the related subject. As per stated, i have created the filter rules using handle selector for packet shaping purpose of ssh , www, etc. its working nicely.Again i want to this rule to work as global for the two different network. If i was not wrong , i have created the rules as tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src

On 09/04/2016 05:00 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> IPADDR2=192.168.1.10 >> BROADCAST2=192.168.1.255 <-- >> NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 >> NETWORK2=192.168.1.0 <-- >> GATEWAY2=192.168.1.1 <-- >> >> in case they don't match the first IP address? > > I'm not sure at this point. If you have to add a second ip in another > different network

0 *H 010 +0 *H $Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi ALL, I''m new to TC and IPTABLES and i need help in setting up a filter/routing solution to an ISP. I''ve read all the HOWTOs and i''ve reading LARTC messages for a month now. I still don''t have a clue on how to do it ''cause sometimes people say

Hi all, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090722/30afa9ee/attachment.htm

Hi, I have multiple ppp interfaces that does not correspond to the same network usage. Do you know anything about trying to set definitively the ppp+ name ? or anything to adapt automagically iptables to the real network which is behind each ppp+ interface ? I''ve tooken a look into the IFNAME env var... but it doesn''t seems to work :c/ regards, -- BeTa

On 04.09.2016 17:33, Ulf Volmer wrote: > > OK, some testing has been done. you have to specify > > IPADDR=192.168.0.10 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK=192.168.0.0 > GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 > IPADDR2=192.168.2.10 > NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK2=192.168.2.0 I tried this way; but 'ifconfig' doesn't show these additional addresses ... > please note, that

I am hoping that someone with more experience and knowledge than I can assist me in finding a solution ;) We have a RedHat AS4 box with 5 interfaces. Two interfaces serve two different networks and two interfaces connect to two different uplinks. The fifth interface is our management interface. Since a picture is worth a thousand words I attempted to come up with a diagram:

On 04.09.2016 15:18, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 09/03/2016 07:34 PM, Walter H. wrote: > >> if I would need an additional IPv6 address I'd just add >> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="ipv6addr" >> to this file; if I would need an additional IPv4 address this works only >> by a virtual device >> e.g. eth0:1 like this: > That's not true, you can add ipv4

Hi List; I am using Firefly softphone Version 1.9.9 Build 4521 and I select IAX protocol and did the configuration in Network1 (and I checked the Active checkbox) as following: Server: 192.168.8.4 username: iax2user1 password: password In the Asterisk, I did the following configuration on the /etc/asterisk/iax.conf: [iax2user1] type=friend context=internal username=iax2user1 secret=password

Hí everybody, you have a nice day. I am configuring accounting in shorewall /etc/shorewall/accounting and the traffic between eth0 (local network)1, eth2(local network2) and eth3(local network3) &lt;--&gt; eth1(ip public network), works fine. I make the accounting because y want to control the remote vpn access(pptpd) throught shorewall. Which is the way to control vpn /ip/access in

Hello List, I have a special L2 VPN connected samba deployment setup and I want to make sure the name resolution arrangement is the best for the network. Setup : network 1 + Samba1<<SAME IP range>> <L2 VPN> network2 <<SAME IP range>> + Samba2 I have noticed that the wins server and wins support options are non-inclusive. Samba2: name resolve order =

I need to be able to set up several server settings (DNS/Zabbix/etc) based on the network that a server is connected to. Could someone show me a straight forward way of doing this? if generate supported pipes I might be able to swing this but apparently I need some help. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

On 09/04/2016 04:40 PM, Walter H. wrote: > On 04.09.2016 15:18, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> That's not true, you can add ipv4 address to the interface in the same >> way: >> >> | IPADDR2=172.17.170.101 >> | NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 >> >> There is no need to create a virtual network device. > ah ok, and the other values? no other values needed. i assume

On Sun, September 4, 2016 9:40 am, Walter H. wrote: > On 04.09.2016 15:18, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> On 09/03/2016 07:34 PM, Walter H. wrote: >> >>> if I would need an additional IPv6 address I'd just add >>> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES="ipv6addr" >>> to this file; if I would need an additional IPv4 address this works >>> only >>> by a

On 7/25/17 10:51 PM, Bright Zhao wrote: > I can think of run two tinc network which are two processes, other than this, any other easier way to make it as one network, but B doesn’t advertise the info from one side to the other side? Yep, create a different network ( /etc/tinc/network2 ) and make it listen (if listening) on a different port. A <---------------> B <-----------> C

Hi, Raul Thank you. In addition, there’s another information I didn’t mention earlier that B have the default route to Internet, where B will advertise this default route to both A and C, so that A and C can go to Internet through B, but A and C wouldn’t have each other’s route accordingly. You can think about A and C share the same internet gateway, but they wouldn’t know each other. Assume A

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:19:50 +0200 freebsd at tango.lu wrote: > On 2018-06-18 10:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:58:07 +0200 > > FreeBSD User via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hello List, > >> > >> I have a special L2 VPN connected samba deployment setup and I want > >> to make sure