similar to: Specify mount option for Storage-Pool

On 09/08/2013 10:19 PM, Osier Yang wrote: > Could you paste the bug number? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924672 -- Jorge

On 09/09/2013 02:42 AM, Osier Yang wrote: > And we have the bug to support the thin pool, sorry you won't be able > to use it until the bug is fixed. Could you share the bug number so I can follow it? Thanks, Jorge

Hi, Is it possible to create a storage pool based on an LVM thin pool? I read a recent bugzilla but the problem there was that the storage-pool became unusable AFTER creating a thinpool which is a different case. Thanks, Jorge

On 09/09/13 11:14, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 09/08/2013 10:19 PM, Osier Yang wrote: >> Could you paste the bug number? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924672 > > The error pasted by Cole in the bug should be the real reason, which is overridden by the later pool stopping. And we have the bug to support the thin pool, sorry you won't be able to use it until

Hi all, Presently writing up "Storage Pool" docs for the Fedora Virtualisation Guide. (using both virsh and virt-manager) Having trouble finding out how to specify mount options for fs type storage pools. For example: # virsh pool-define-as guest_images_fs fs - - /dev/sdc1 - "/guest_images" Pool guest_images_fs defined # virsh pool-build guest_images_fs Pool

On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:10:46 -0600 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/01/2013 06:04 AM, James Gibbon wrote: > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > I have a KVM guest VM which is a clone of a production machine > > running on a different physical server, incarnated from an > > image backup. > > Careful. You need to scrub more than

Hi all, I was trying to mount root-partition which is ext3 partition with noatime and ro option. I included "ro" in the kernel command line But for mounting it with "noatime" option when I searched for some solution I came across a patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/5/38 But after applying this patch and including option "noatime" in

Hi, I have some guests running in the "default" network (virbr0) and I've also created a similar (NAT) network (virbr1). Therefore, the FORWARD chain for the CentOS 6.4 host looks like this: http://fpaste.org/29229/75281379/ ...where line 3-7 are related to virbr0 and 8-12 to virbr1. My 2 questions: 1) I've noticed that I can ping from a guest within virbr0 to any guest on

Hello, I was wondering while playing with the mount type if there is a way to just add options to mountpoint without touching anything else. For exemple : # prevent kernel bug mount { proc: options => [ ''noexec'',''nosuid''] } or mount { var: options => [ ''noatime'',''usrquota''] } as i want to add and

On 09/09/13 03:53, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to create a storage pool based on an LVM thin pool? I > read a recent bugzilla but the problem there was that the storage-pool > became unusable AFTER creating a thinpool which is a different case. Could you paste the bug number? > > Thanks, > Jorge > >

Greetings - I'm now in the last couple of weeks before going live with Dovecot (v1.0.3) on our revamped IMAP service. I'd like to double-check about the best mount options to use; could someone advise, please? I have three separate directory trees for the message store, the control files and the index files. These are arranged as follows: Message Store Mounted over NFS from

On 08/06/2013 06:38 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 07/31/2013 11:01 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: >> That is, the first network can reach all other networks (just because it >> happens to be the first one defined). Is this the intention (only >> default can talk to the others but not the other way around)? > *Bump* > > I found this excellent post by Daniel Berrange: >

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:41:51PM -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 01/22/2014 09:44 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > > Is the solution to it addition of 5 separate "networks" in libvirt, and > > then connecting each guest to its own "network"? > > Yes, that's it. Right now I suggest you create 5 separate "isolated" > networks if

On 2/6/2017 1:46 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > After a bit of search, I found the associated reports: > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13351 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454876 > > No solution yet, but -as a workaround- it seems that -at least- nfs > problems are indeed solved with downgrading. I have been working fine with CentOS 7.3, since I

2013/10/2 Jorge Fábregas <jorge.fabregas@gmail.com> > On 10/01/2013 09:29 AM, James Gibbon wrote: > > Would be grateful if someone could suggest a way to disable the > networking in the > > cloned VM within the XML, if that's possible. > > I have no idea if it's possible to "disable" the NIC on the VM > definition but you could boot into

Hi Is there clean way to ensure that a glusterfs mount point specified in /etc/fstab is mounted automatically on boot under debian lenny when referencing a remote node for the volfile? In my test case everytime I reboot, the system tries to mount the filesystem before the backend 10ge interface comes up so it gets a "No route to host" and immediately aborts. I know I can dump a mount

Hello All, I finally compiled xen 3.3.0 using make World, installed it but I cannot get it to Boot, I always get kernel panic, kernel not sync kind of errors, I suppose it''s some hard disk or partition issue, my setup is as follows. CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on a HP ML-115 Grub, menu.list Entries CentOS xen''s line title CentOS (2.6.18-92.1.22.el5xen) root

Which disk is it? /dev/sda6 or /dev/sdb8 or /dev/sdc6? >From my log: Jun 10 21:25:39 postamt1 kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device Jun 10 21:25:39 postamt1 kernel: 08:06: rw=0, want=1680353324, limit=59954548 Jun 10 21:25:39 postamt1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,6)): ext3_readdir: directory #3473659 contains a hole at offset 1852399616 $ mount /dev/sdb6 on / type auto (rw)

I set up a 3.3 gluster volume for another sysadmin and he has added it to his cluster via automount. It seems to work initially but after some time (days) he is now regularly seeing this warning: "Too many levels of symbolic links" $ df: `/share/gl': Too many levels of symbolic links when he tries to traverse the mounted filesystems. I've been using gluster with static mounts

Hi I have a single filesystem i don't mount noatime because mutt would work very good otherwise. Today, in a discussion about mkisofs, i learned that Linux since 2.6.8 supports "O_NOATIME" as an option to open. (see "man 2 open") So how comes that rsync doesn't do that and/or there is no option to switch on that behaviour? Bis denn -- Real Programmers