similar to: Libvirt and Glusterfs pool

Hello Nithya! Thank you for your help on figuring this out! We changed our configuration and after having a successful test yesterday we have run into new issue today. The test including moderate read/write (~20-30 Mb/s) and scaling the storage was running about 3 hours and at some moment system got stuck: On the user level there are such errors when trying to work with filesystem: OSError:

Hello Nithya! Thank you so much, I think we are close to build a stable storage solution according to your recommendations. Here's our rebalance log - please don't pay attention to error messages after 9AM - this is when we manually destroyed volume to recreate it for further testing. Also all remove-brick operations you could see in the log were executed manually when recreating volume.

Fellow gluster users, trying to extend a 3 node cluster that is serving me very reliably for a long time now. Cluster is serving two volumes: Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 9bafc4d2-d9b6-4b6d-a631-1cf42d1d2559 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 6 x (2 + 1) = 18 Transport-type: tcp Volume Name: gv1 Type: Replicate Volume ID:

Hey, Did the heal completed and you still have some entries pending heal? If yes then can you provide the following informations to debug the issue. 1. Which version of gluster you are running 2. gluster volume heal <volname> info summary or gluster volume heal <volname> info 3. getfattr -d -e hex -m . <filepath-on-brick> output of any one of the which is pending heal from all

Hi Karthik, Thank you for your reply. The heal is still undergoing, as the /var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log keeps growing, and there's a lot of pending entries in the heal info. The gluster version is 3.10.9 and 3.10.10 (the version update in progress). It doesn't have info summary [yet?], and the heal info is way too long to attach here. (It takes more than 20 minutes just to collect

Hi Karthik, Thank you very much, you made me much more relaxed. Below is getfattr output for a file from all the bricks: root at gv2 ~ # getfattr -d -e hex -m . /data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack

Hi folks, I'm troubled moving an arbiter brick to another server because of I/O load issues. My setup is as follows: # gluster volume info Volume Name: myvol Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 43ba517a-ac09-461e-99da-a197759a7dc8 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: gv0:/data/glusterfs Brick2: gv1:/data/glusterfs Brick3:

Hi, I upgraded to a Fedora 29 host using virt-preview repo to libvirt-daemon-5.6.0-1.fc29.x86_64 The host was using plain Fedora 29 without virt-preview before that. After the upgrade, starting some vms that were running fine fail now with this error: Error starting domain: internal error: child reported (status=125): Requested operation is not valid: Setting different DAC user or group on

Hi, On a Fedora 18, I try to launch a VM with QEMU-GlusterFS native integration. I have enable fedora-virt-preview repo, and gluster-alpha3 repo. Below the list of installed package : glusterfs-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-devel-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64 glusterfs-server-3.4.0-0.3.alpha3.fc18.x86_64

Hello, we are trying to configure a CTDB-Cluster with Glusterfs. We are using Samba 4.5 together with gluster 3.9. We set up a lvm2 thin-provisioned volume to use gluster-snapshots. Then we configured the first share without using shadow_copy2 and everything was working fine. Then we added the shadow_copy2 parameters, when we did a "smbclient" we got the following message: root at

I believe you should support authorized_keys as well. On Wednesday 09 September 2009 19:01:06 ovirt-devel-request at redhat.com wrote: > Send Ovirt-devel mailing list submissions to > ovirt-devel at redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ovirt-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or

Please help troubleshooting glusterfs with the following setup: Distributed volume without replication. Sharding enabled. [root at master-5f81bad0054a11e8bf7d0671029ed6b8 uploads]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 1a7e05f6-4aa8-48d3-b8e3-300637031925 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 27 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

Please help troubleshooting glusterfs with the following setup: Distributed volume without replication. Sharding enabled. # cat /etc/centos-release CentOS release 6.9 (Final) # glusterfs --version glusterfs 3.12.3 [root at master-5f81bad0054a11e8bf7d0671029ed6b8 uploads]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 1a7e05f6-4aa8-48d3-b8e3-300637031925 Status:

On 5 February 2018 at 15:40, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: > [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] > 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing > [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] > [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no

Hi, I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 122440868 [2018-02-04 07:41:16.244261] W [fuse-bridge.c:2398:fuse_writev_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse:

Background .... Three Fedora servers, 34 and two 37.? Upgraded on of the servers to Fedora 39.? For some reason the 39 server would not rejoin the party.? So I deleted the Fedora 39 server, manually tidied up the brick on Fed39 (192.168.3.31).? I run peer probe and all three serves are connected. Now the volume displays [FQDN switched to IPs] as below. So I think I just need to add the brick

Hi all, I have a distributed / replicated pool consisting of 2 boxes, with 3 bricks a piece. Each brick is mounted via a RAID 6 array consisting of 11 6 TB disks. I'm running CentOS 7 with XFS and LVM. The 150 TB pool is loaded with about 15 TB of data. Clients are connected via FUSE. I'm using glusterfs 3.12.1. I've found that running large rsyncs to populate the pool are taking a

Hi Strahil, This is the output from the commands: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# du -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick 2.2G /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.glusterfs 24M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/scalelite-recordings 16K /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/mytute 18M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.shard 0

Thanks for the clarification. That behaviour is quite weird as arbiter bricks should hold?only metadata. What does the following show on host?uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01: du -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brickdu -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick3/brickdu -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick2/brick If indeed the shards are taking space -?that is a really strange situation.From which version

The ovirt-server package has started to slip behind the curve WRT Ruby on Rails development; i.e., the current version of ovirt-server is not quite runnable as is on F12. And with F13 coming, the gap's only going to widen. So I'm considering the idea of freezing the version of Rails on the ovirt-server project for the time being. I'll check with the Fedora packaging team to see if