similar to: [Query] Access procfs of guest VM using libguestfs

Hi all, I am using libvirt:qemu-kvm and I want to access(RO) the procfs of the guest vm. I was trying to use guestfs for the same purpose. I can access /tmp of the guest but not the /proc Is it a known issue? If so, how can I overcome the same? Any pointers? Snippet> [root@hv285 scoreboards]# virsh list Id Name State

Dear All, I am following a flow to generate object files(.o) from input (.s assembly) files. The input .s is given to AsmParser, which creates MCInst after matching instruction opcode. These MCInst are converted to MCStream and then finally emitting to an object file using Target Code Emitter. I am considering whether hazard recognition can be done on the list of MCInst, which I get after

More specifically -- when you get the "not found" in the browser there should be an entry logged in the error log. E.g., tail the error log, issue a request, and see what you see. The error log entry will show the details of what is being requested and generally gives strong hints as to why it can't be found (pathing, access, etc.). If you don't get an entry in the error log that

ARM can reuse all the default scoreboard hazard recognizer logic such as recede cycle (naturally since its the primary client). If you can do the same with PPC that's great. Andy On Nov 29, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> Thanks! Since I have to change PPCHazardRecognizer for bottom-up support >> anyway, is there any reason not to have it

Andy, I should have been more clear, the ARM implementation has: void ARMHazardRecognizer::RecedeCycle() { llvm_unreachable("reverse ARM hazard checking unsupported"); } How does that work? Thanks again, Hal On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 09:47 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > ARM can reuse all the default scoreboard hazard recognizer logic such as recede cycle (naturally since its the

Hi to everyone, while working with the machine scheduler for a personal project, I came up with the necessity of inserting a backup boundary in the MachineSchedulerStrategy -- specifically, the PostGenericScheduler -- to hold a copy the scheduler's state, in order to implement a really trivial (and really inefficient) backtracking mechanism. This approach leads to a subtle "segmentation

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 15:45 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > > > > Is EmitInstruction used in bottom-up scheduling at all? The > > > version in > > > the ARM recognizer seems essential, but in all of the regression > > > tests > > > (and some other .ll files I have lying around),

Andy, Is there any good info/docs on scheduling strategy in LLVM? As I was complaining to you at the LLVM meeting, I end up reverse engineering/double guessing more than I would like to... This thread shows that I am not exactly alone in this... Thanks. Sergei Larin -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 08:29 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 15:45 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > > > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is EmitInstruction used in bottom-up scheduling at all? The > > > > version in > > > > the ARM recognizer seems essential, but in all of the

On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > Andy, > > I should have been more clear, the ARM implementation has: > void ARMHazardRecognizer::RecedeCycle() { > llvm_unreachable("reverse ARM hazard checking unsupported"); > } > > How does that work? > > Thanks again, > Hal Hal, My first answer was off the top of my head, so missed the subtle

I'm using openSUSE 11.1 KDE 4.1 and I'm trying to install Team Fortress 2 which I installed by clicking run with wine on the setup.exe which was on the DVD. Steam installed installed with no problems, But when I start TF2: 1.I get no background image in the menu, 2. there is no crossair in the game, 3. the scoreboard doesn't appear by click tab, 4. the frag notifications doesn't

I know this has been brought up before but I''m receiving the error ... Process environment requires procfs(5) ... when trying to restart my cluster. I''ve narrowed it down to ''find_pid'' method in init.rb. I''m running a FreeBSD 6.2 server and mongrel_cluster version 1.0.5. The command that gives me the error is ... ps -ewwo pid,command ... but

Author: peterte Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: b681de1a640aeda1c2465325a301eec62c555cef Log message: 6324745 vmem memory leak in the procfs PAGEDATA subsystem. 6329403 hrm_init() cannot ever return -1 but in various places we check for that. 6330765 procfs pagedata can panic machine. Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/vm/hat_refmod.c

running 4.8 stable, the cmdline file in /proc/$$ seems to be trucated at, or before 256 bytes for very long command lines. I cant find any refernec to this behaviour in the manpage, nor does google reveal anything. I took a look in the source, but didnt properly understand what was going on - the comments imply that it does give the full commandline for the current process, however. any

I recently did a backport of a couple of networking bug fixes from s10x_u4_b6 to s10x_u3_b10. I patched just /platform/i86pc/kernel/unix and /platform/i86pc/kernel/amd64/unix in my existing u3 OS image and I''m seeing this dtrace problem when running any dtrace script: NODE hcb101 ~ $ ./tcpstat.sh dtrace: failed to compile script /dev/fd/10: "/usr/lib/dtrace/procfs.d", line

I'm considering writing more-detailed itineraries for some PowerPC CPUs that use the 'traditional' instruction grouping scheme. In essence, this means that multiple instructions will stall in some pipeline stage until a complete group is formed, then all will continue. I expect to provide CPU-specific code to help determine when the currently-waiting instructions would form a group.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:17.procfs Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Kernel memory disclosure in procfs and linprocfs Category: core Module: sys Announced:

Hello, I was wondering if it was possible to limit user access on /proc without having to use securelevels. For some reason chmod 751 /proc (or 750) does nothing. Is this possible on FreeBSD 4.9 ? Can't find anything about it in the manual pages. Just want to prevent lusers from running: for file in /proc/*/cmdline; do cat $file; echo; done Greetz, Jimmy Scott

I''m running the latest mongrel (1.0.1) and the latest mongrel_cluster (1.0.1.1) on FreeBSD 6.1. When I use capistrano to try to stop or restart my cluster I get this (partial) output: ps: Process environment requires procfs(5) And my Mongrel processes haven''t stopped. Any ideas? Thanks, Jamie

Hello, Darren: I read your post on the newsgroup: <http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-September/073808.html> I read your post when I was having trouble configuring my apache server to work with ldap. After reading your post, I installed the openldap library on my solaris 8 machine. I have a question, when you install the library, and configure the apache server with the following