similar to: [PATCH] tools: fix free -m invocation

The man page for getline says: ssize_t getline(char **lineptr, size_t *n, FILE *stream); [...] If *lineptr is set to NULL and *n is set 0 before the call, then get‐ line() will allocate a buffer for storing the line. This buffer should be freed by the user program even if getline() failed. which seems to indicate that we must initialize both line and len to 0 before the first

Dear all, We are trying to install a new Samba server to replace the old one and support Windows 7 clients. But it doesn't work ! When we try to register a machine into th domain, it seems to be accepted by the client but we find these messages in samba logs : > rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:_netr_ServerAuthenticate2(555) > _netr_ServerAuthenticate2: netlogon_creds_server_check

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:0180 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0180.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 8fb0d1c834bd99f117aef7d1f13e9cba3964a7f836be73f60821ed1e2a4e3e30 procps-ng-3.3.10-5.el7_2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:1700 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1700 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: f7ce2dcac6c044bca70128514f82e0039005965b8003813b54b182708d348d1f procps-ng-3.3.10-17.el7_5.2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3068 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3068 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 998c32ea1dce916f3ef38fc8eeb7bf94903dba06735e6322e1245faf9d4ac9d6 procps-ng-3.3.10-26.el7_7.1.i686.rpm

Hi again, I changed from 3.4.5 to 3.3.10 after an AD upgrade to 2008R2 and prinitng is working mor ore less but it is incredibly sloooow. My server has no remarkable load so it is not due to hardware bottlenecks. Are there any ways to 'tune' 3.3.10 or any tricks to make it faster ? cheers ~christoph -- /* Christoph Beyer | Office: Building 2b / 23 *\ * DESY

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Dear all, I have a very strange problem with "pdbedit -Lv" under Samba 3.3.10, a lot of users and machines are missing ! Strangely, all these missing machines and users are working perfectly well. The problem is that I need to get their SID to be able to migrate to a new server... TECHNICAL DETAILS : * Samba 3.3.10 * Number of machines : * Unix : 128 machines * pdbedit

Thank you very much for your answer. It's the default, internal backend. (smbpasswd) a) If I do : tdbdump schannel_store.tdb dump | grep BWPC |grep SECRET | wc I get 95 machines (this number looks good). b) smbpasswd is a text file that looks good. c) I can also do "tdbdump secrets.tdb dump" Thanks a lot in advance for any advice, Denis Le 15.12.2014 22:00, Gaiseric

Dear all, We have perfectly working roaming profiles on Samba 3.3.10 (SuSE) with Windows 7 clients. We configured our new server with same domain name, Samba 4.1.11 (Debian). On the new server, for newly created profiles, it works perfectly, we can login, logout, profiles are created and saved. But if we want to copy an existing profile from current server to the new one, it's

the testparm command will show you the location of the password file and the backend type e.g. smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd passdb backend = tdbsam The backend file should be a TDB database file , not a plain text file (unless left over from an older version.) You may have users or computers with duplicated SIDs. You should also use "getent

=================================================================== "If you?re ridin? ahead of the herd, take a look back every now and then to make sure it?s still there with ya." Cowboy Proverb =================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest bugfix release of the Samba 3.3

=================================================================== "If you?re ridin? ahead of the herd, take a look back every now and then to make sure it?s still there with ya." Cowboy Proverb =================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest bugfix release of the Samba 3.3

After upgrading from samba3-3.3.10-40.el5.i386.rpm to samba3-3.4.7-42.el5.i386.rpm, I'm seeing a lot of [2010/05/05 11:06:42, 1] smbd/vfs.c:932(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for addrbook/CVS [2010/05/05 11:06:42, 1] smbd/vfs.c:932(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for beta/CVS [2010/05/05 11:06:42, 1]

Hi all, I have a question about memory usage and IPC$ share. I'am auditing the swap usage of my server because I already have a problem with a full swap. I see that the smbd process take < 200Mo on swap : Example : PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 24429 lge 15 0 197m 39m 14m S 0.3 1.0 0:15.17 smbd but some process use more than 200Mo

Hi, I'm facing an issue with at least two Samba servers in production both showing important number of log entries like: smbd[27355]: PANIC: assert failed at smbd/oplock.c(149): exclusive_oplocks_open>=0 Looking at the source code, this panic is triggered when the number of exclusive oplocks for a given file becomes negative. Once triggered for one smbd process, this process can

You forgot to reply to the list. Also CC'ing LLVMdev. On 3/12/10 1:41 PM, Edmund Grimley-Evans wrote: >>> clang -cc1 -triple thumbv7-eabi -O3 -target-cpu cortex-a8 t.c >>> -emit-llvm-bc >>> llc t.bc ... -view-legalize-dags >> You just answered your own question :). That will work quite nicely >> actually. > > Maybe it would if I knew exactly what

Hi, I am stuck on upgrading the current Samba3 to Samba4, currently used Samba 3.3.10 and upgraded to Samba 3.4.17 still the same problems below. I also try to upgrade the Python 2.4.3 to Python 2.7 still same problems, with the OpenLDAP 2.3.43. [root at ewanko]# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/var/lib/samba/ --use-xattrs=yes --realm=ewanko.local

Hello, I am getting some odd behaviour. If I execute rake spec, and then try to modify a spec file that I have open in vi, and then go to save this file, vi warns me that the file has been modified outside of vi. However, if I execute only this file via script/spec, this modification does not take place. I file doesn''t appear to be getting substantively modified, so I''m

This may sound weird, but we are considering adding a parameter/directory in the URL where a XML-RPC service implemented in ROR is called. We don''t want to modify the method call. Do you think it is possible using, maybe, routes? How would you test it? -- An?bal Rojas http://www.lacaraoscura.com/ anibalrojas@gmail.com