similar to: [PATCH] appliance: init: run ldconfig

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] appliance: init: run ldconfig"

2016 May 12
2
[PATCH 1/2] Revert "appliance: init: run ldconfig"
Running ldconfig adds about 100ms to the boot time. I would prefer that we understood which libraries need ldconfig to be run, and fix that. We could also consider running ldconfig in parallel, but since it might be required by just about any binary that the init script runs it's not clear what benefit that gives. This reverts commit 66aa98265dd215dcd4c717e7ef6845fbac859e54. ---
2015 Jun 03
2
[PATCH] appliance: Make sure /tmp and /var/tmp are real directories.
Currently if /tmp (on the host) is a symlink, then the symlink is copied into the appliance, probably pointing to a non-existent directory, and everything goes downhill from there. Avoid this by making sure that /tmp and /var/tmp are real directories. --- appliance/init | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init index 3c5ef1b..3973f18 100755 ---
2015 Jun 05
0
Re: [PATCH] appliance: Make sure /tmp and /var/tmp are real directories.
In data mercoledì 3 giugno 2015 18:57:38, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: > Currently if /tmp (on the host) is a symlink, then the symlink is > copied into the appliance, probably pointing to a non-existent > directory, and everything goes downhill from there. > > Avoid this by making sure that /tmp and /var/tmp are real directories. > --- > appliance/init | 5 +++++ > 1
2002 Feb 15
1
ldconfig : ..... .so is not a symbolic link
After updating this morning cvs udpate -APd rm config.cache ./configure make depend && make i get this when 'make install' : what should i do ? (think i won't be the only one) /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine_unicode.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine_tsx11.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine.so is not a
2008 Feb 18
1
ldconfig -R issue (Was: Problems with icu - 3.8)
+stable@ Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > Why are so many people are bitten by this? Is that the jobs of port-upgrading > tool to safe copy these libraries to compat so that all programs using > the old libraries works? Portupgrade preserves the libraries in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg: % ls /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ libicudata.so.36.0 libicule.so.36.0 libicuuc.so.36.0
2010 May 11
1
ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
I have been getting the following error when trying to run ldconfig: ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link # ll /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 312336 Mar 28 11:13 /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so I've used "yum whatprovides /usr/lib64/libfreeb13.so" to determine that this file belongs to nss. I have tried to reinstall nss but that does not fix the
2020 May 28
0
xinetd custom service - perl - remote address
In article <202005281646.34790.gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk>, Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > I can't believe that I can't find the answer to this one. I have a perl script which is called by xinetd. > > I want that perl script to be able to detect the remote IP address of the caller. > > I presumed that it
2004 Feb 22
0
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link on fedora 1
I am tring to install wine-20040213-1fc1winehq.i386.rpm into fedora 1 on a celeron 500. When I install it it gives an error: /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link It still installs something and when I try to run a windows app I get this error: err:virtual:map_image Standard load address for a Win32 program (0x00400000) not available - security-patched kernel ? wine: could not load
2016 Dec 08
2
How to join join Ubuntu desktop to AD
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:27:20 -0500 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I think I have a issue with ldconfig not finding winbind. I create > the sym links and verified they exist. What am I missing? Thanks. > > ldconfig -v | grep "libnss_" > /sbin/ldconfig.real: Path `/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' given more than once >
2008 Dec 16
2
Yum messages: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is not a symbolic link
Ran yum update this A.M. Got this. Is it a problem for rpmforge, CentOS or just me? Maybe not a problem at all? /etc/ld.so.conf.d files are "box stock", so there were no clues there. TIA for any insight. =================================================== Running Transaction Updating : cups-libs [ 1/10] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is
2016 Dec 08
4
How to join join Ubuntu desktop to AD
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:03:49 -0500 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 12/8/2016 12:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:27:20 -0500 > > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I think I have a issue with ldconfig not finding winbind. I create > >> the sym links and
2015 Oct 29
1
Problem with libnss_winbind.so.2
Good afternoon people. Wiki'm following procedure: RHEL based OSIf you have compiled Samba yourself on a RHEL based OS, to have your domain users and groups available locally on your Domain Member, you need to place two links in your /lib64 folder:# ln -s /usr/local/samba/lib/libnss_winbind.so /lib64# ln -s /lib64/libnss_winbind.so /lib64/libnss_winbind.so.2# ldconfig But does not charge.
2014 Sep 09
2
elrepo problem?
So much for elrepo being a painless way to get working Nvidia drivers... Yum update (or just update glibc) says: --> Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: nvidia-x11-drv-304xx-304.123-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: nvidia-x11-drv-304xx-304.123-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 (@elrepo) Requires: /usr/sbin/ldconfig Removing:
2016 Dec 08
2
How to join join Ubuntu desktop to AD
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:54:17 -0500 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 12/8/2016 1:14 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:03:49 -0500 > > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On 12/8/2016 12:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:27:20
2017 Jul 17
2
Messages during update 'yum update' at CentOS 6 VM
Hello, at the last update (Kernel updated from 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 to 2.6.32-696.6.3.el6.x86_64) I got these messages Updating : ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64 6/25 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yi7R81: line 1: /usr/sbin/ldconfig: No such file or directory warning: %post(ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package
2016 Aug 10
1
File Server member DC ACL permissions
I will choose to use the winbind. Based on the link that Rowland said: https://wiki.samba.org /index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member I followed the steps as described in the tutorial. I created symlinks. In the main DC I added this line in smb.conf: idmap_ldb: use RFC2307 = yes Changed /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files winbind shadow: files group: files winbind hosts:
2004 Aug 06
1
ices and libshout.so.1
> "./ices: error while loading shared libraries: libshout.so.1: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory" >>Is libshout installed? What I know I haven't installed it, is there a debian package of it so I can install or reinstall it mayne? >>Did you run ldconfig? When I do a ldconfig I get this back in return " ldconfig:
2002 Apr 18
2
wine libs
G'day all, I update wine daily from cvs and install it into /usr/local/wine using a custom script, not the wine install script. Previously all the shared libs were in /usr/local/wine/lib and this dir was picked up by ldconfig and everyone was happy. Now I have /usr/local/wine/lib and /usr/local/wine/lib/wine ldconfig picks up the former but not the latter. To get wine to work I have to set
2015 Sep 23
2
UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1
On Sep 22, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote: > So, here is what I think I know: > > NUT is using the libusb-1.0.20 library, by way of the libusb-compat layer. When I check the configure log, it says "libusb-0.1.12" I'm not sure why it says that, as in where it gets that value, as that version doesn't correspond to anything I installed. I
2007 Oct 24
5
Error while running YUM UPDATE today
error viewed: Updating : openssl ####################### [ 1/48] /sbin/ldconfig: /lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is not an ELF file - it has the wr ong magic bytes at the start. Updating : openssl ####################### [ 1/48] /sbin/ldconfig: /lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is not an ELF file - it has the wr ong magic bytes at the start. Any one