similar to: Ubuntu and ZFS

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:28:29AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:19:58AM +0100, Tim Fletcher wrote: > > Moved from Richard's blog to here.... > > > > A couple of people have requested removing the dependency on > > zfs-fuse from the ubuntu packages that Richard released last week, > > and there is some confusion about the state

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:19:58AM +0100, Tim Fletcher wrote: > Moved from Richard's blog to here.... > > A couple of people have requested removing the dependency on > zfs-fuse from the ubuntu packages that Richard released last week, > and there is some confusion about the state of ZFS in Ubuntu. > > There are 2 Linux compatible implementations of ZFS, zfs-fuse >

Il 25-06-2018 23:59 Yves Bellefeuille ha scritto: > I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't > tried): > > http://zfsonlinux.org/ > https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS > > to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page: > > https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalResources/Repositories/ > > unless someone with

Hi list, we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license. I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux more intergrated with current CentOS. From

I see that Pinguy OS, an uber-Ubuntu o/s, includes native ZFS support. Any pointers to more info on this? -- David

Benjamin Smith wrote: > On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 11:25:00 AM PDT Andrew Holway wrote: > >>> Btw, right now, we've just built a new server as Ubuntu, because my >>> manager wants to use it to test zfs, including its ability to a) act >>> as a RAID, directly, without an underlying RAID, and b) encrypt the >>> whole thing natively. >> >>

Hi all, I thought I?d post this in case any one has issues similar to mine. First, my initial email to the list which I didn?t send; I?m trying to run a KVM based guest OS off of a mirrored ZFS dataset. It won?t run with errors "invalid argument..", but will run when on the root volume, or when that ZFS dataset has been removed in favor of an EXT4 volumes. Thanks in advance, PS I

Hi everybody, I'm looking for information about using GlusterFS with ZFS. I got information that talked about a sort of incompatibility between the both technologies because of unsupported xattr feature in ZFS. What are the latest news about this ? Thank you in advance.

Speaking of ZFS, got a weird one: we were testing ZFS (ok, it was on Ubuntu, but that shouldn't make a difference, I would think). and I've got a zpool z2. I pulled one drive, to simulate a drive failure, and it rebuilt with the hot spare. Then I pushed the drive I'd pulled back in... and it does not look like I've got a hot spare. zpool status shows config: NAME STATE

Hello, A college friend of mine is using Debian Linux on his desktop, and wondered if he could tap into ZFS goodness without adding another server in his small quiet apartment or changing the desktop OS. According to his research, there are some kernel modules for Debian which implement ZFS, or a FUSE variant. Can anyone comment how stable and functional these are? Performance is a

Hi, I am having a really strange problem with my Samba shares on Debian Buster. None of the users can access any shares, which reside on ZFS-filesystem. Any other share works just fine. For example, if I create a normal folder to /home with same permissions and replace a ZFS-share with that, it works fine. When accessing any ZFS-shares the following error is recorded: Jan 08 22:39:56

I think it may have something to do with my disks being encrypted. This issue happened after updating systemd to version 236, ZoL to 0.7.4 and kernel to 4.14. I have always mounted the pool manually by first opening LUKS-encrypted disks and after that issuing zpool import tank. Is there any way to still use systemd to manage smbd or do I have to just always start it manually? This is how the

As if last weekend's UEFI debacle wasn't bad enough, it now seems the latest C8 kernel (4.18.0-193.14.2) is incompatible with the current ZFSOnLinux packages (0.8.4-1). When booted to the latest kernel, ZFS is inaccessible on my C8 storage server. When I back off to the prior kernel (4.18.0-193.6.3), all is well. If a local ZFS system is unavailable to the C8 kernel support folks,

On 26/10/2019 22:51, tootifrooti via samba wrote: >> Is there any way to still use systemd to manage smbd or do I have to >> just always start it manually? > Did you ever find a solution to this problem? I'm experiencing a very > similar problem right now. When running samba via systemd any access to a > share on a zfs filesystem results in the `make_connection_snum: >

On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Blake Hudson <blake at ispn.net> wrote: > > I've never used ZFS, as its Linux support has been historically poor. When was the last time you checked? The ZFS-on-Linux (ZoL) code has been stable for years. In recent months, the BSDs have rebased their offerings from Illumos to ZoL. The macOS port, called O3X, is also mostly based on ZoL. That leaves

> Maybe you can tune ZFS further, but I tried it in userspace (with FUSE) and reading was a almost 5 times slower than MDADM. That alone is meaningless. MDADM with which filesystem? Zfsonlinux does not work in user space, it is a kernel module. Just try it.

I am trying to use gee() to calculate the robust standard errors for a logit model. My dataset (zol) has 195019 observations; winner, racebl, raceas, racehi are all binary variables. ID is saved as a vector of length 195019 with alternating 0's and 1's. I get the following error message. I also tried the same command with corstr set to "independence" and got the same

We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to manage when you start climbing, especially when you have to upgrade, so we're contemplating switching to ZFS. As of last spring, it appears that ZFS On Linux http://zfsonlinux.org/ calls itself production ready despite a version number of 0.6.2, and

Hi all, I have a server running 7.3 using the zfs-kmod packages from zfsonlinux.org. For the update to 7.4, I followed https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-&-CentOS: removal of all zfs - and related packages and installation of the zfs-release.7.4.noarch.rpm Afterwards, yum will find almost all packages from that repository - except for the zfs-0.7.1-1.el7_4.x86_64.rpm itself

I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6.