similar to: IPv6 router on CentOS

Hi, I am getting the problem to access shared folder when I am using Dual boot operating System. Let say I have two operating system on the same machine. 1) XP and the name of the machine in xp environment is "XYZ" 2)Cent OS (Linux) and the name of the machine in Linux environment is "ABC" both operating system share the same static IP address. the problem appear when I have

I am trying te set up a test lab to test my application. In my test lab I need to install Domain Controller (With Active Directory) , DNS server , IIS Server and DHCP server. I have to install each server on different test machine. for example Domain Server(Active Directory) on Machine-1 DNS server on Machine-2 IIS Server on Machine-3 DHCP Server on Machine-4 for example domain name is

Could any one let me know how can I compile & build CentOS kernel. In redhat Linux the kernel source ia available under /usr/src/linux But in CentOS i am getting two directories named as Kernels and redhat under /usr/src the directory /usr/src/redhat is having again four subdirectory without any contents name as BUILD, RPMS, SPECS, SRPM And /usr/src/kenrnels is having the the directory

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:32:06AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > The check comes from commit 00d28a78b5d1 ("network: check accept_ra > before enabling ipv6 forwarding"), and it's there because the accept_ra > flag works like this (from Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt): > > 0 Do not accept Router Advertisements. > 1 Accept Router Advertisements if

Hi all, I try to receive an ipv6 address for my PPP link via autoconf (against Cisco machine), but there is a problem I'm unable to solve so far. I can see cisco's Router-Advertisement containing prefix etc., but no IP adress is assigned to tun0 interface. Anyone succesful in IPv6 over dial-up PPP connection? When I manually assign IPv6 address, connection works. My system is

Hi, Sorry for the delay. On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 23:52:46 -0400 Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote: > On 8/10/20 11:23 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Firstly THANK YOU for the IPv6 NAT support merged in 6.5. It has been > > almost impossible to get IPv6 into a VM on a laptop that switches > > between wifi and wired (dock) connections, because

In the setup I'm looking now there are IPv4-only and IPv6-only SIP-clients (or UA's) but the Proxies (or servers) are v4 and v6 dual-stacked (to make things a bit easier). I think there will be a lot of IPv6-only SIP-clients (e.g. mobile clients and all the existing IPv4-NAT'ed networks) and a lot of IPv4-only "old legacy" SIP-clients. We have to find ways to deal with such

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:16:37PM -0800, Dave Taht wrote: > I have been gradually moving more tinc servers over to ipv6 addresses > on the tinc 1.1 branch. > > Tinc is inserting a default route for ipv6 for some reason... > > default via 2600:3c01:e030:f2::1 dev tinc6 proto static metric 950 > pref medium > > In my case the default route supplied by ra is still

the man page for RADVD says: radvd is the router advertisement daemon for IPv6. It listens to router solicitations and sends router advertisements as described in "Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)" (RFC 2461). With these advertise- ments hosts can automatically configure their addresses and some other parameters. They also can choose

Yes, the thanksgiving holiday is here (in the USA)! But also, the fear of running out of IP addresses next year has raised its ugly head and since we don't do Thanksgiving in Europe, we have some serious talking to do about this problem. This Friday at 12 Noon EST, Olle Johansson will be joining us to describe the state of the migration to IP v6 in VoIP-dom. Olle (@oej) needs no introduction.

Dear list, I'm trying to get Asterisk to work dual-stack on Linux and I'm left with a question. Imagine that a user (on the road) connects to Asterisk from various places. Many of them probably don't have IPv6 support yet. However, his house and office do have IPv6 connectivity. I would like to make sure that whenever IPv6 is available, the connection will be made over IPv6, but

I am running multiple IPv6 subnets here in my testbed. My IPv6 'router' is a Centos box with IPv6forwarding turned on. It is also my RADVD server (over multiple VLans), and Miredo server/relay. I thought I had a simple ip6table setup that protected the box and let it forward. Well I am wrong. I got my previous DNS over IPv6 working on the DNS server, then tried to get it working

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT&T and it includes a /56 > of IPv6 addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried > to get IPv6 working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a > gateway and it's worked great for several versions for IPv4. > > I'm not seeing any

On my network, I'm finding that if I run host saffron on any machine on my network, I see saffron's IPv4 address, but not its IPv6 address. This is true regardless of which joined machine I run. I'd like to figure out how to fix this... For any other machine on the network, host $hostname shows both that machine's IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. (With the odd exception of

Hello I've got this Mini-PC https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano everything is fine -> latest 6.8 kernel works; both Ethernet-Interfaces work and also the WLAN-Interface works; the two Ethernet-Interfaces are eth0 and eth1 the WLAN-Interface is wlan0 eth1 is connected on ISP side eth0 is connected on my LAN side to a switch; and wlan0 shall also be on my LAN side f?r

Hello, I'm build system with two director/proxy and dual stack network (or IPv6-only local services) http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director say "This also means that a single director ring must use either IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, but not both at the same time." OK All servers have 2 interface (public and local network), and all dual stack IPv4/IPv6, imap/pop (mail) and lmtp (mx) proxy run

Hello I've got two prefixes, one /48 and one /64 let's say these two 2001:db8:0815::/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::/64 the router has on it's ethernet interface the following to IPv6 addresses: 2001:db8:0815::1/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1/64 a windows box has 2001:db8:0815::17/48 and 2001:db8:0815::1 as it's gateway a linux box has 2001:db8:4711:cafe::11/64 and 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1 as

Hi, At my provider (xs4all) I've got an ipv6 tunnel working. Now I would like to distribute ipv6 via the tinc tunnel. My tinc.conf: ------------ Name=server AddressFamily=ipv4 Device=/dev/net/tun PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/fvhglobalnet/rsa_key.priv GraphDumpFile=|/usr/bin/dot -Tpng -o /var/www/htdocs.keetweej.vanheusden.com/stats/tinc-fvh-network-graph.png Mode=switch KeyExpire=299

Hi all, I love this project, Gluster and Ganesha are amazing. Thank you for this great work! The only thing that I miss is IPv6 support. I know that there are some challenges and that?s OK. For me it?s not important whether Gluster servers use IPv4 or IPv6 to speak each other and replicate data. The only thing that I?d like to have is a floating IPv6 for clients when I use Ganesha (just IPv6,

To route a subnet in ipv6 there are two possibilities: - add route commands for the subnet in each computer - or use neighbor proxy in the router server I prefer neighbor proxy. So I have to activate neighbor proxy in the router: sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.proxy_ndp=1 and I have to add entries for each client in the subnet like ip -6 neigh add proxy