similar to: [Bug 1426] New: Inefficient command lookup on errors

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199 Bug ID: 1199 Summary: nft_set_hash fast lookup broken for 2 byte keys Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1444 Bug ID: 1444 Summary: nftables-0.9.6 crashes on some set notations: Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1365 Bug ID: 1365 Summary: nft crashes in chain_print_declaration() Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=967 Summary: segfault when adding large sets Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1426 Summary: ssh key verification hint (on remote side) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1228 Bug ID: 1228 Summary: [REGRESSION] nft cannot load big set anymore Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1092 Bug ID: 1092 Summary: nft v0.6 segfault in must_print_eq_op at expression.c:520 during 'nft monitor trace' in netdev filter Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 Bug ID: 1201 Summary: Some filters randomly do not work since version 0.8 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1418 Bug ID: 1418 Summary: segfaults when running nft --file foo.nft --echo Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1426 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1426.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: aa500979ef80025fcaab323bf0ae7bca9f266d8a72232c24fd1033f0d923d9b5 kernel-2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1426 openoffice.org security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1426.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-44.2.0.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/openoffice.org-i18n-1.1.2-44.2.0.EL3.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1426 openoffice.org security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1426.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-44.2.0.EL3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/openoffice.org-i18n-1.1.2-44.2.0.EL3.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1426 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1426.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6317e0dcc71903e61bde63f964935c1450d5d062db164cb0e81b22de541bf812 xorg-x11-server-common-1.13.0-11.1.el6.centos.2.i686.rpm

Patches item #16627, was opened at 2007-12-26 21:13 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=413&aid=16627&group_id=85 Category: win32-service Group: Code Cleanup Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Replace inefficient busy wait loop with UDP/IP loopback socket. Initial Comment:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1665 Summary: prefix_pton is inefficient Product: py-radix Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Default AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: weinholt at

RFC 4731: " IMAP4 Extension to SEARCH Command for Controlling What Kind of Information Is Returned" https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4731 I do this (telnet session): """ a select proveedores/TUHS * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted. * 8330 EXISTS * 0 RECENT

Hello all, I'm having an issue with Winbind and I'm not sure if it's occurring by design or not. My Samba server resides in a Windows NT domain and uses winbindd to authenticate to a mixed-mode 2003 domain over a trust relationship. Everything works the way it ought to. However, every so often my users experience delays of anywhere from 30 to 60 seconds when connecting to a share,

(I sent this earlier, but it seems not to have come through, due to problems witkh my system) The following command from appendix A, "a sample session", isnt correct: contour(x, y, fa, nint=15) when used R protests: Warning message: parameter "nint" couldn't be set in high-level plot() function it should probably be nlevels, as used a few lines before. This is

samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > Samba, as we know, is wonderful. I truly enjoyed my Sun PC/NFS > disk/documentation bonfire. I operate Samba on some Sparc 10's running > Solaris 2.5 and 2.6, mixed in with Win/NT 4.0 servers at SP3. Everybody > (almost) at this site uses Win95 and WinNT PCs, but needs access to > unix disk space for some other purposes. Samba bridges that

Thanks for the response, Jerry. Is there a way for me to verify this is happening? Winbindd has been running for a few days now, and I just did a netstat and the only connections to a DC are to the off-site one, the PDC. Thanks. Sven -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 10:19 PM To: SRuth@LANDAM.com Cc: