similar to: [Bug 1394] New: "Bad argument `ACCEPT'" when iptables-restore (nft) parses stdin

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1400 Bug ID: 1400 Summary: "COMMIT expected at line ..." when iptables-restore 1.8.4 (nft) parses stdin with empty lines Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9495

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347 Bug ID: 1347 Summary: ebtables-nft: regression in -o option Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1196 Bug ID: 1196 Summary: nft does not allow comments within sets: Error: syntax error, unexpected newline Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1383 Bug ID: 1383 Summary: When using include, nft shows the wrong file name in errors Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087 Bug ID: 1087 Summary: Window Tracking not disabled Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon Assignee: netfilter-buglog

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 Bug ID: 1298 Summary: Issue with REJECT in custom chains Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073 Bug ID: 1073 Summary: inet-service vs icmp conflict Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162 Bug ID: 1162 Summary: oops in nft_rbtree_insert Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965 Summary: Deleting rules using "position" keyword deletes all rules for chain Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1445 Bug ID: 1445 Summary: conntrackd: segfaults when not disabling internal cache Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292 Bug ID: 1292 Summary: issue with -f fragment option Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286 Bug ID: 1286 Summary: -Z regression Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 Bug ID: 1290 Summary: ptables: nftables layer breaks ipsec/policy keyword Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable

Hi all, We have already bought 30 Digium G.729 licenses to install in several machines, but Digium only has provided on key to use in registration. We suspect that the registration has assigned the whole 30 licenses to the same server. Do anyone know how to distribute the licenses among several servers? Thanks in advance. -- Arturo D?az Contact me on FWD: 870436 Skype: arturo.diaz.almagro

Quiero comparar varias dosis letales 50% (LD50) usando análisis probit. He seguido un ejemplo que viene en paquete DRC, pero no obtengo el resultado esperado. Lo que quiero es saber si las LD50s, son diferentes y si la diferencias son estadísticamente significativas. Gracias de antemano. José Arturo e-mail. jafarfan@uady.mx <grejon@uady.mx> e-mail alterno. jafarfan@gmail.com

Hola, saludos desde México. Me estoy iniciando en el uso de R, que me parece un muy buen programa. Yo doy la clase de bioestadística en la facultad de Medicina de Mérida, Yucatán en México. Me gustaría hacer contacto con personas que estén usando R en el área biomédica, especialmente en docencia, para compartir experiencias, dudas, ejemplos, etc. Saludos José Arturo [[alternative HTML version

Hello comunity, I'm trying to find a similar function as decile of SPSS, NTILES (10) some of you know about that, I will appreciate your help in advance. In SPSS VARIABLES=Sales (A) /NTILES (10) /PRINT=NO for example if I have Next data input: case IdCust Sales Profit 1 265 140.81 314.31 2 266 1778.96 408.32 3 267 2663.66 820.85 4 268 2994.14 913.73 5 269 2185.58 686.64 6 271 105.21

Hello, I have setup a Samba server with CentOS 5.2 and Samba 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 (the CentOS included versi?n). I have configured Samba as a PDC following "Samba-3 by example" chapter 3, "Secure Office Networking". No DNS or DHCP active, as far as for now this is just a test environment. Most of it works fine, but trying to change user passwords for a MS-Windows test computer

Hi guys, I have this question: Can asterisk + fax for asterisk do this ?? Send Fax on Machine A to Fax machine B?? Fax Machine A--> FXS port on digium card --> asterisk 1.6 --> Sip with t.38 --> internet --> Sip with t.38 --> asterisk 1.6 --> FXS port --> Fax Machine B I've been reading documentation for fax for asterisk, but I'll appreciate if someone can

Hi I''m having a issue with one object when try to update the attributes in this object previously saved in the database I have one object comp and one object reg they have this relationship comp has_many regs reg belongs_to comp when run use the method valid? like this current_contribuyente.comps.build(params[:comp]).valid? it returns: IndexError (string not matched) And when