similar to: [Bug 1342] New: IPv6 NAT translates to addresses outside of specified range

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "[Bug 1342] New: IPv6 NAT translates to addresses outside of specified range"

2016 Jun 28
1
[Bug 1077] New: New traffic reduces conntrack timeout
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1077 Bug ID: 1077 Summary: New traffic reduces conntrack timeout Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nf_conntrack Assignee: netfilter-buglog
2018 Sep 04
8
[Bug 1277] New: v1.8.0 FTBFS on Void Linux due to conflicting definitions
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1277 Bug ID: 1277 Summary: v1.8.0 FTBFS on Void Linux due to conflicting definitions Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: unknown
2010 Sep 16
2
Can the require value be a function?
Hello I have this fly::create_dir { "/usr/share/mysql-zrm/pkgs" : mode => 0755, owner => bin, group => bin } ==> creates the directory and parents .. it just does a mkdir -p with couple test so I have file { "$client_package_file" : path => "/usr/share/mysql-zrm/pkgs/$client_package_file",
2010 Feb 12
1
where is MySQL-zrm-client rpm package?
i was looking at options for backing up mysql databases across the net, and ran across this: http://www.zmanda.com/download-zrm.php clearly, there are two rpms for linux: * MySQL-zrm-2.2.0-1.noarch.rpm * MySQL-zrm-client-2.2.0-1.noarch.rpm but on a centos 5.4 system, if i do # yum search zrm i see only "MySQL-zrm.noarch". anyone know why the centos repo would only know about
2014 Nov 10
3
backup incrementals on mysql
Hi all. I usally make backups of databases mysql. I make buckups of all datbase for example: mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db > backups.sql also I make backups just its schema for example mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db --no-data > backups.sql but now I need a backups incrementals, because the size of DB is very big (500 mb) How to make this? regards -- *Atte.
2009 Mar 28
2
Have an idea about ZFS improvements - step to the user. Is it actual?
Hi, I have an idea about improvements of ZFS from the one side and improvements for of the GUI interface from the other side. Let me describe my idea. >From the one side we have an ZFS on-th-fly snapshots, and starting from OpenSolaris 2008.11 we have TimeSlider user feature based on ZFS snaphots. So, we made a big step to the user. But from the other side we still have in GUI interface
2009 Jan 11
35
SDXC and the future of ZFS
Wouldn''t it be great if the opensolaris community creates a fs fzfs (for flash zfs) that could be the the filesystem for SDXC cards? Two main point for this are already there Sun is a member of SD Card Association and the code writting smart on a flash should be there as well with stuff of l2arc. I think that could give the opensolaris a more visiblie/ markting in the IT space and would
2006 Apr 18
0
[Bug 472] New: REDIRECT target translates all packets' destination to main IP of interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Summary: REDIRECT target translates all packets' destination to main IP of interface Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2
2006 Apr 21
1
[Bug 472] REDIRECT target translates all packets' destination to main IP of interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=472 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-04-21
2006 May 11
0
[Bug 473] New: 2.6.16.x translates addresses of RELATED packets incorrectly
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=473 Summary: 2.6.16.x translates addresses of RELATED packets incorrectly Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT
2012 Sep 12
0
[Bug 1342] SSH_ASKPASS not working as expected
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---
2016 Aug 02
0
[Bug 1342] SSH_ASKPASS not working as expected
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release
2012 Oct 08
0
CEBA-2012:1342 CentOS 5 sssd Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1342 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1342.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e6b15dc206d9f724d54d917fc9b6cb84209c12cab835b774514e73a4e315c117 libipa_hbac-1.5.1-49.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
2019 Jun 24
0
CEEA-2019:1342 CentOS 7 python-msrest Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2019:1342 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:1342 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 2b7707efdd4389d9360b8675b65ecec0961d8e3a9497ba767c225cffcfcb68ee python-msrest-0.5.4-0.el7_6.1.noarch.rpm Source:
2023 Apr 28
1
Asterisk translates 200 OK + SDP into 488 not acceptable here after both side agreed on codec.
Hi List Asterisk 16.28.0 in use. PJSIP in use Two endpoints Both using IPv6 One Endpoint on UDP, the other via TLS. Both with: t38_udptl=yes ;fax_detect=yes ;fax_detect_timeout=30 rtp_ipv6=yes Both sides are T.38 capable and detect fax tone so no need for fax detection on asterisk. Voice calls between the two work fine. But on a Fax call, I see this situation: A <=> Asterisk
2019 Jun 08
4
[RFC] Coding Standards: "prefer `int` for regular arithmetic, use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior."
Hi, The LLVM coding style does not specify anything about the use of signed/unsigned integer, and the codebase is inconsistent (there is a majority of code that is using unsigned index in loops today though). I'd like to suggest that we specify to prefer `int` when possible and use `unsigned` only for bitmask and when you intend to rely on wrapping behavior, see:
2019 Jun 06
2
Fail2ban for asterisk 16 PJSIP
Hello Anyone have a working copy of Fail2ban asterisk filter asterisk.conf for Asterisk 16 running PJSIP. I have tried 10 different filters but none of them show any matches when testing with fail2ban-regex I see date template hits but no matches.... My log [2019-06-06 15:37:20] NOTICE[18081] res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c: Request 'REGISTER' from '"2405" <sip:2405 at
2019 Jun 07
5
Transformar factor a numérico.
Hola, Estoy levantando un archivo csv y hay dos campos (atendidos, asistidos) que necesito leerlos como numéricos o enteros, pero al levantarlos están en formato factor. Como puedo hacer para transformarlos a numéricos? caac_enero_2019<-read.csv("1-Informe Caac Geonode-Mes de Enero.csv",sep = ";") [image: image.png] Intenté con: caac_enero_2019$asistidos<
2019 Jun 20
0
Multiple errors from rsync - later 'soft' error raised rather than earlier 'hard' error.
Peter, I was about to post the below to the rsync mailing list, but wondered whether your code which captures rsync output may have allowed rsync to continue past what I think would normally be a fatal error? Thanks Rob. P.S. Should I put the final backups of the old pearcey /home back into their correct slots - 5 backups were recycled, but nothing was added to them? The .Snapshots area is
2019 Jun 08
2
Does CentOS support aspell?
I haven't run CentOS on a machine of my own for several years; but my domain (NOT the address I post from) is hosted on a machine running CentOS. The list for the mailer I run recommends using aspell, which is not installed (according to rpm -q) on the remote host, as a spellchecker. Does anybody here know offhand if CentOS supports it? Or how do I check? -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not