similar to: [Bug 1310] New: syntax issue with tproxy

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 1310] New: syntax issue with tproxy"

2019 Oct 15
2
Attempting to use tproxy on Centos 8 fails with 'No such file or directory'
I was working on a haproxy transparent proxy setup that we had working on Centos 7 (iptables), but running into issues getting tproxy working with NFTables on Centos 8. >From https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt, It should be a matter of: # nft add table filter # nft add chain filter divert "{ type filter hook prerouting priority -150; }" # nft add rule
2019 Oct 15
1
Attempting to use tproxy on Centos 8 fails with 'No such file or directory'
On 10/15/19 9:16 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > On 2019-10-15 12:12 p.m., Nathan Coulson wrote: >> I was working on a haproxy transparent proxy setup that we had working >> on Centos 7 (iptables), but running into issues getting tproxy working >> with NFTables on Centos 8. >> >> From https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt, >> >> It
2019 Oct 15
0
Attempting to use tproxy on Centos 8 fails with 'No such file or directory'
On 2019-10-15 12:12 p.m., Nathan Coulson wrote: > I was working on a haproxy transparent proxy setup that we had working > on Centos 7 (iptables), but running into issues getting tproxy working > with NFTables on Centos 8. > > From https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt, > > It should be a matter of: > > # nft add table filter > # nft add
2023 Jun 02
3
[Bug 1686] New: Transparent proxy support requires transport protocol match
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1686 Bug ID: 1686 Summary: Transparent proxy support requires transport protocol match Product: nftables Version: git (please specify your HEAD) Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5
2010 Jun 15
4
TPROXY configuration
I''m trying to get TPROXY / Squid running and I have a few questions... I found this page: http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#TPROXY However, it doesn''t explain what I''m seeing in the configuration. For the zone file, do I keep my loc and net configurations and just add the following to the file? - lo - - or do I remove the loc and net zones and
2020 Jan 16
2
[Bug 1398] New: tproxy rule is not matched for ip6
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1398 Bug ID: 1398 Summary: tproxy rule is not matched for ip6 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
2017 Aug 08
1
CentOS6, IP6tables, Routing, TPROXY (squid34 epel package)
Hello, how do achieve this: how must files /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ look like to be the same as entering the following two commands ... ip -f inet6 rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip -f inet6 route add local ::/0 dev lo table 100 is there the localhost device lo correct, or does it have to be br0? e.g. a file route-br0 with 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.10.10.1 dev br0 does the routing to the
2020 Apr 10
15
[Bug 1422] New: iptables-nft fails to check / delete rules in raw table
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1422 Bug ID: 1422 Summary: iptables-nft fails to check / delete rules in raw table Product: iptables Version: 1.6.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables
2012 May 08
19
Shorewall, TPROXY, Transparent Squid and Multiples ISP
Hello, I wonder if someone could use the TPROXY with Shorewall and transparent Squid  with using the routing rules on shorewall (tcrules) for hosts / networks (LAN) with multiples providers (WANs) directly from the internal network on port 80 (with TPROXY transparent squid or REDIRECT). On this issue, the routing rules is not work propertly because the source is the
2016 Mar 08
4
[Bug 1057] New: Allow for multiple protocols to be specified in a rule
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1057 Bug ID: 1057 Summary: Allow for multiple protocols to be specified in a rule Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at
2019 Oct 07
4
[Bug 1368] New: The "meta's"
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1368 Bug ID: 1368 Summary: The "meta's" Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
2013 Apr 26
0
TPROXY/IPv6: Documentation bugs?
In working through an IPv6/TPROXY issue I had, I believe I found a documentation bug: http://www.shorewall.net/manpages6/shorewall6-tcrules.html In the ACTION section, for part 12. SAME: The documentation lists: #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST # PORT(S) SAME:P 192.168.1.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 tcp
2019 Sep 05
4
[Bug 1364] New: nft list outputs mark rules with boolean or in a form that can be parsed by nft -f
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1364 Bug ID: 1364 Summary: nft list outputs mark rules with boolean or in a form that can be parsed by nft -f Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5
2011 Mar 31
3
[PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features
Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). RX checksum offload is forced on - so advertise as it is. Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> --- [I don't know Xen code enough to say this is correct. There
2011 Mar 31
3
[PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features
Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). RX checksum offload is forced on - so advertise as it is. Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> --- [I don't know Xen code enough to say this is correct. There
2011 Mar 31
3
[PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features
Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). RX checksum offload is forced on - so advertise as it is. Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> --- [I don't know Xen code enough to say this is correct. There
2017 Nov 24
8
[PATCH 00/13] remove_conflicting_framebuffers() cleanup
This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. The last patch is here because it uses new semantics of remove_conflicting_framebuffers() from this series. This can be considered independently, though. --- Micha? Miros?aw (13): fbdev: show fbdev number for debugging fbdev: add
2017 Nov 24
8
[PATCH 00/13] remove_conflicting_framebuffers() cleanup
This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. The last patch is here because it uses new semantics of remove_conflicting_framebuffers() from this series. This can be considered independently, though. --- Micha? Miros?aw (13): fbdev: show fbdev number for debugging fbdev: add
2018 Sep 01
17
[PATCH v3 00/13] remove_conflicting_framebuffers() cleanup
This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. This is a sligtly updated version of a series sent on 24 Nov 2017. --- v2: - rebased on current drm-next - dropped staging/sm750fb changes - added kernel docs for DRM helpers v3: - move kerneldoc to fbdev, where functions are implemented - split kerneldoc
2018 Sep 01
17
[PATCH v3 00/13] remove_conflicting_framebuffers() cleanup
This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. This is a sligtly updated version of a series sent on 24 Nov 2017. --- v2: - rebased on current drm-next - dropped staging/sm750fb changes - added kernel docs for DRM helpers v3: - move kerneldoc to fbdev, where functions are implemented - split kerneldoc