similar to: [Bug 1221] New: "fib" produces strange results with an IPv6 default route

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1220 Bug ID: 1220 Summary: Reverse path filtering using "fib" needs better documentation Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1397 Bug ID: 1397 Summary: What am I doing wrong!? Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.7 This release contains many accumulated bug fixes and new features available up to the (upcoming) Linux 4.10-rc1 kernel release. * Facilitate migration from iptables to nftables: At compilation time, you have to pass this option. # ./configure --with-xtables And libxtables needs to be installed in your system. This allows

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 Bug ID: 1742 Summary: using nfqueue breaks SCTP connection (tracking) Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: libnetfilter_queue Assignee:

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.8 This release contains new features available up to the (upcoming) Linux 4.14 kernel release: * Support for stateful objects, these objects are uniquely identified by a user-defined name, you can refer to them from rules, and there is a well established interface to operate with them, eg. # nft add counter filter test

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1057 Bug ID: 1057 Summary: Allow for multiple protocols to be specified in a rule Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

Hello, I used iproute2 to do iif specific routing on wifi routers with 2 wifi 802.11b interfaces on non overlapping interfaces. I set rule as follows on router-2 (shown below) use table 100 if incomming interface is wlan0 use table 200 if incomming interface is wlan1 all routes in table 100 have wlan1 as oif all routes in table 200 have wlan0 as oif --wlan0--

For some time I have routinely websurfed across a forwarded TCP connection using SSH. The other end of the TCP tunnel connects to a Squid proxy cache on the same machine. This usually works. But I see lots of error messages on each end of the form Jun 13 13:22:02 tunnel sshd[32378]: error: channel 0: chan_shutdown_read: shutdown() failed for fd5 [i1 o128]: Transport endpoint is not connected

Hello, i hope this is the right list! I tried making a firewall for my laptop..it wasn't as terribly difficult as i thought it would be but i'm not sure if i forgot anything. And things can always be done better :) I'm not sure what i should've put under incoming connections... what i have put there now is pretty useless because the default is to deny, but should i accept any

Hi all, I need some guidance to get my problem fixed. I believe there is an issue with the ''nth'' patch from the patch-o-matic, which is labeled as status ''works''. I have tunnels back and forth across the internet, using ''nth'' to balance packets between different public networks (over the tunnels). I need to access some networks over two

Hi , this probably was asked many times before , but here it goes.. Until now i was using dsl_qos_queue - http://www.sonicspike.net/software/ Which limits outbound traffic and does packet priorites with iptables using MARKed packets.. works very well , I run a ftpserver + webserver so it''s usefull to set these 2 with lowest priority and my multiplayer gaming running on certain UDP ports

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1117 Bug ID: 1117 Summary: Table ipv4-nat prerouting dnat doesn't accept dest IP:PORT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

When I compile my C fibonacci example fib.c with 'clang -O3 -c -emit-llvm -o fib-clang.bc fib.c&& llvm-dis fib-clang.bc' I get fib-clang.ll that has some degree of inlining in it. But when I get an equivalent to fib.c file fib.ll and run it through opt with the command 'llvm-as fib.ll&& opt -O3 fib.bc -o fib-opt.bc&& llvm-dis fib-opt.bc' resulting

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=884 Summary: the rule of TEE target with '--oif' option cannot be deleted. Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

I run the same simple Fibonacci computing code in JIT and as a native executable. I see that with argument 45 JIT runs for 11.3sec and executable runs for 7.5sec. Why there is such difference? Yuri -------- fib.ll -------- ; ModuleID = 'all.bc' @.str = private constant [12 x i8] c"fib(%i)=%i\0A\00", align 1 ; <[12 x i8]*> [#uses=1] define i32 @fib(i32 %AnArg) {

Maybe a kernel USB issue, but people on this list may have encountered this issue. I am testing a new UPS (EATON 5E 1500iUSB) and am having a problem with the USB connection failing. My old UPS (EATON Ellipse MAX 1500) works just fine with the latest f30. Both devices identify as ID 0463:ffff MGE UPS Systems UPS To narrow the focus I booted recent live CDs on a PC that has no other USB devices

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com> wrote: > When I compile my C fibonacci example fib.c with 'clang -O3 -c -emit-llvm -o fib-clang.bc fib.c&&  llvm-dis fib-clang.bc' I get fib-clang.ll that has some degree of inlining in it. > > But when I get an equivalent to fib.c file fib.ll and run it through opt with the command 'llvm-as

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-04 23:41 ------- Created an attachment (id=10) proposed fix for the hh_len(iif) > hh_len(oif) case of ipt_REJECT sending tcp RST ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-04 23:45 ------- the attachment was for bug #22, sorry. -------

Having tried out llvm I had to notice that the fibonacci example program hangs after short: > ./run fib 1 1 2 3 5 8 ^C For the next number it would be supposed to last twice as long as for 8. However it hangs forever instead. using llvm-2.5-0.pm.1.1.x86_64 Does not matter whether I compile it with gcc or interprete it with lli.

Valery, That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Reid. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible > optimizations are really invoked. > > Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 >